Dataset Information

Circulating Cell Free DNA as the Diagnostic Marker for Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Quantitative analyses of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are potential methods for the detection of ovarian cancer. Many studies have evaluated these approaches, but the results were too inconsistent to be conclusive. This study is the first to systematically evaluate the accuracy of circulating cfDNA for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer by conducting meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases systematically for relevant literatures up to December 10, 2015. All analyses were conducted using Meta-DiSc1.4 and Stata 12.0 software. Sensitivity, specificity and other measures of accuracy of circulating cfDNA for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer were pooled. Meta-regression was performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity.

Results

This meta-analysis included a total of 9 studies, including 462 ovarian cancer patients and 407 controls. The summary estimates for quantitative analysis of circulating cfDNA in ovarian cancer screen were as follows: sensitivity, 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.65-0.74); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.93); positive likelihood ratio, 6.60 (95% CI, 3.90-11.17); negative likelihood ratio, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.25-0.47); diagnostic odds ratio, 26.05 (95% CI, 14.67-46.26); and area under the curve, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95), respectively. There was no statistical significance for the evaluation of publication bias.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests that quantitative analysis of cfDNA has unsatisfactory sensitivity but acceptable specificity for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Further large-scale prospective studies are required to validate the potential applicability of using circulating cfDNA alone or in combination with conventional markers as diagnostic biomarker for ovarian cancer and explore potential factors that may influence the accuracy of ovarian cancer diagnosis.

SUBMITTER: Zhou Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4890757 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Circulating Cell Free DNA as the Diagnostic Marker for Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhou Quan Q Li Wei W Leng Bingjie B Zheng Wenfei W He Ze Z Zuo Manzhen M Chen Aihua A

PloS one 20160602 6

<h4>Background</h4>Quantitative analyses of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are potential methods for the detection of ovarian cancer. Many studies have evaluated these approaches, but the results were too inconsistent to be conclusive. This study is the first to systematically evaluate the accuracy of circulating cfDNA for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer by conducting meta-analysis.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure ( ...[more]

PMID: 27253331

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEarly diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for treatment. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an extracellular nucleic acid found in serum, and tumor cfDNA circulating in the blood may be used as a biomarker for early diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application value of cfDNA as a biomarker for the diagnosis of NSCLC through meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and Web of Science databases using the following search terms: lung cancer, NSCLC, biomarkers, circulating cfDNA, cfDNA, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating cell-free tumor DNA, and diagnosis. The retrieval period was set until September 2021. According to PICOS (patients, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design) principles the inclusion criteria were: aged ≥18 years; at least 10 NSCLC cases; NSCLC patients diagnosed by histopathology or cytology; circulating cfDNA was detected; outcome data could be completely extracted. Bias risk assessment was conducted according to the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies). RevMan 5.3 was used for meta-analysis.ResultsEight studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 618 NSCLC patients and 635 healthy subjects. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.82] and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiving operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8941. The pooled positive likelihood ratio, pooled negative likelihood ratio, and pooled diagnostic odds ratio were 5.37 (95% CI: 2.67-10.81), 0.24 (95% CI: 0.15-0.38), and 24.68 (95% CI: 8.85-68.84), respectively. The patient selection bias was high in two articles was high, unclear in one article, and low in the remaining five ones. The risk of bias in the research index test was unclear in one article, and low in the remaining seven articles. The reference standard bias, and flow and time bias of all articles was low.ConclusionsCirculating cfDNA is an efficacy biomarker in diagnosis of NSCLC. Its clinical application technology is worthy of further research.

Dataset Information

Circulating Cell Free DNA as the Diagnostic Marker for Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Circulating Cell Free DNA as the Diagnostic Marker for Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets