Dataset Information

The global network antenatal corticosteroids trial: impact on stillbirth.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Antenatal corticosteroids are commonly used to reduce neonatal mortality, but most research to date has been in high-resource settings and few studies have evaluated its impact on stillbirth. In the Antenatal Corticosteroids Trial (ACT), a multi-country trial to assess impact of a multi-faceted intervention including antenatal corticosteroids to reduce neonatal mortality associated with preterm birth, we found an overall increase in 28-day neonatal mortality and stillbirth associated with the intervention.

Methods

The ACT was a cluster-randomized trial conducted in 102 clusters across 7 research sites in 6 countries (India [2 sites], Pakistan, Zambia, Kenya, Guatemala and Argentina), comparing an intervention to train birth attendants at all levels of the health system to identify women at risk of preterm birth, administer corticosteroids and refer women at risk. Because of inadequate gestational age dating, the <5(th) percentile birth weight was used as a proxy for preterm birth. A pre-specified secondary outcome of the trial was stillbirth.

Results

After adjusting for the pre-trial imbalance in stillbirth rates, the ACT intervention was associated with a non-significant increased risk of stillbirth (aRR 1.08, 95 % CI, 0.99-1.17, p-0.073). Additionally, the stillbirth rate was higher in the term births (1.20 95 % CI 1.06-1.37, 0.004) and among those with signs of maceration (RR 1.18 (1.04-1.35), p = 0.013) in the intervention vs. control clusters. Differences in obstetric care favored the control clusters and maternal infection was likely more common in the intervention clusters.

Conclusions

In this pragmatic trial, limited data were available to identify the causes of the increase in stillbirths in the intervention clusters. A higher rate of stillbirth in the intervention clusters prior to the trial, differences in obstetric care and an increase in maternal infection are potential explanations for the observed increase in stillbirths in the intervention clusters during the trial.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01084096).

SUBMITTER: Goldenberg RL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4891888 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The global network antenatal corticosteroids trial: impact on stillbirth.

Goldenberg Robert L RL Thorsten Vanessa R VR Althabe Fernando F Saleem Sarah S Garces Ana A Carlo Waldemar A WA Pasha Omrana O Chomba Elwyn E Goudar Shivaprasad S Esamai Fabian F Krebs Nancy F NF Derman Richard J RJ Liechty Edward A EA Patel Archana A Hibberd Patricia L PL Buekens Pierre M PM Koso-Thomas Marion M Miodovnik Menachem M Jobe Alan H AH Wallace Dennis D DD Belizán José M JM McClure Elizabeth M EM

Reproductive health 20160602 1

<h4>Background</h4>Antenatal corticosteroids are commonly used to reduce neonatal mortality, but most research to date has been in high-resource settings and few studies have evaluated its impact on stillbirth. In the Antenatal Corticosteroids Trial (ACT), a multi-country trial to assess impact of a multi-faceted intervention including antenatal corticosteroids to reduce neonatal mortality associated with preterm birth, we found an overall increase in 28-day neonatal mortality and stillbirth ass ...[more]

PMID: 27255082

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe Antenatal Corticosteroid Trial (ACT) assessed the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of a multifaceted intervention to increase the use of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) in mothers at risk of preterm birth at all levels of care in low and middle-income countries. The intervention effectively increased the use of ACS but had no overall impact on neonatal mortality in the targeted <5(th) percentile birth weight infants. Being in the intervention clusters was also associated with an overall increase in neonatal deaths. We sought to explore plausible pathways through which this intervention increased neonatal mortality.MethodsWe conducted secondary analyses to assess site differences in outcome and potential explanations for the differences in outcomes if found. By site, and in the intervention and control clusters, we evaluated characteristics of the mothers and care systems, the proportion of the <5(th) percentile infants and the overall population that received ACS, the rates of possible severe bacterial infection (pSBI), determined from clinical signs, and neonatal mortality rates.ResultsThere were substantial differences between the sites in both participant and health system characteristics, with Guatemala and Argentina generally having the highest levels of care. In some sites there were substantial differences in the health system characteristics between the intervention and control clusters. The increase in ACS in the intervention clusters was similar among the sites. While overall, there was no difference in neonatal mortality among <5(th) percentile births between the intervention and control clusters, Guatemala and Pakistan both had significant reductions in neonatal mortality in the <5(th) percentile infants in the intervention clusters. The improvement in neonatal mortality in the Guatemalan site in the <5(th) percentile infants was associated with a higher level of care at the site and an improvement in care in the intervention clusters. There was a significant increase overall in neonatal mortality in the intervention clusters compared to the control. Across sites, this increase in neonatal mortality was statistically significant and most apparent in the African sites. This increase in neonatal mortality was accompanied by a significant increase in pSBI in the African sites.ConclusionsThe improvement in neonatal mortality in the Guatemalan site in the <5(th) percentile infants was associated with a higher level of care and an improvement in care in the intervention clusters. The increase in neonatal mortality in the intervention clusters across all sites was largely driven by the poorer outcomes in the African sites, which also had an increase in pSBI in the intervention clusters. We emphasize that these results come from secondary analyses. Additional prospective studies are needed to assess the effectiveness and safety of ACS on neonatal health in low resource settings.Trial registrationTrial registrationclinicaltrials.gov (NCT01084096).

Project description:BackgroundStillbirth rates are high and represent a substantial proportion of the under-5 mortality in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). In LMIC, where nearly 98% of stillbirths worldwide occur, few population-based studies have documented cause of stillbirths or the trends in rate of stillbirth over time.MethodsWe undertook a prospective, population-based multi-country research study of all pregnant women in defined geographic areas across 7 sites in low-resource settings (Kenya, Zambia, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala). Staff collected demographic and health care characteristics with outcomes obtained at delivery. Cause of stillbirth was assigned by algorithm.ResultsFrom 2010 through 2018, 573,148 women were enrolled with delivery data obtained. Of the 552,547 births that reached 500 g or 20 weeks gestation, 15,604 were stillbirths; a rate of 28.2 stillbirths per 1000 births. The stillbirth rates were 19.3 in the Guatemala site, 23.8 in the African sites, and 33.3 in the Asian sites. Specifically, stillbirth rates were highest in the Pakistan site, which also documented a substantial decrease in stillbirth rates over the study period, from 56.0 per 1000 (95% CI 51.0, 61.0) in 2010 to 44.4 per 1000 (95% CI 39.1, 49.7) in 2018. The Nagpur, India site also documented a substantial decrease in stillbirths from 32.5 (95% CI 29.0, 36.1) to 16.9 (95% CI 13.9, 19.9) per 1000 in 2018; however, other sites had only small declines in stillbirth over the same period. Women who were less educated and older as well as those with less access to antenatal care and with vaginal assisted delivery were at increased risk of stillbirth. The major fetal causes of stillbirth were birth asphyxia (44.0% of stillbirths) and infectious causes (22.2%). The maternal conditions that were observed among those with stillbirth were obstructed or prolonged labor, antepartum hemorrhage and maternal infections.ConclusionsOver the study period, stillbirth rates have remained relatively high across all sites. With the exceptions of the Pakistan and Nagpur sites, Global Network sites did not observe substantial changes in their stillbirth rates. Women who were less educated and had less access to antenatal and obstetric care remained at the highest burden of stillbirth.Study registrationClinicaltrials.gov (ID# NCT01073475).

Project description:IntroductionAntenatal corticosteroids are widely used to prevent morbidity and mortality after preterm birth, but there are ongoing concerns about the possible risk of long-term adverse effects, including perturbation of endocrine systems, with potential implications for reproduction. A small number of animal studies have suggested possible adverse effects on reproduction after antenatal exposure to corticosteroids, but there is a paucity of human data.Material and methodsThis is a secondary cohort analysis of the 50-year follow-up of the Auckland Steroid Trial (1969-1974) comparing antenatal exposure to corticosteroids or placebo. Participants whose mothers took part in the placebo-controlled randomized trial of antenatal corticosteroids completed a questionnaire reporting reproductive outcomes at 50 years of age. The main outcome was at least one pregnancy ≥20 weeks or fathered at least one pregnancy ≥20 weeks. Additional outcomes included a number of pregnancies or fathered pregnancies ≥20 weeks, outcomes relating to female reproductive lifespan (including age at menarche and menopause), and outcomes relating to their offspring (including birthweight and gestation).ResultsOf 917 eligible participants, 415 (45% of eligible) completed the questionnaire at a mean (SD) age of 49.3 (1.0) years. The proportion of participants who had experienced at least one pregnancy ≥20 weeks or fathered at least one pregnancy ≥20 weeks was similar in betamethasone and placebo-exposed groups (163/217 [75%] vs. 136/190 [72%]; RR 1.08, (95% CI 0.95 to 1.22); p = 0.23). Participants exposed to betamethasone had a slightly higher number of pregnancies or fathered pregnancies ≥20 weeks compared to those exposed to placebo (mean 1.89 vs. 1.60; marginal mean difference 0.20, (95% CI 0.03-0.37); p = 0.03). Other outcomes, including female reproductive lifespan and offspring-related outcomes, were similar in both randomized groups. There were also no differences in any outcomes between those born preterm and those born at term.ConclusionsAntenatal exposure to corticosteroids appears to have no clinically important effect on reproductive outcomes to 50 years.

Dataset Information

The global network antenatal corticosteroids trial: impact on stillbirth.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Publications

The global network antenatal corticosteroids trial: impact on stillbirth.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets