Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes-2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names.


ABSTRACT: Article 59.1, of the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICN; Melbourne Code), which addresses the nomenclature of pleomorphic fungi, became effective from 30 July 2011. Since that date, each fungal species can have one nomenclaturally correct name in a particular classification. All other previously used names for this species will be considered as synonyms. The older generic epithet takes priority over the younger name. Any widely used younger names proposed for use, must comply with Art. 57.2 and their usage should be approved by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi (NCF). In this paper, we list all genera currently accepted by us in Dothideomycetes (belonging to 23 orders and 110 families), including pleomorphic and nonpleomorphic genera. In the case of pleomorphic genera, we follow the rulings of the current ICN and propose single generic names for future usage. The taxonomic placements of 1261 genera are listed as an outline. Protected names and suppressed names for 34 pleomorphic genera are listed separately. Notes and justifications are provided for possible proposed names after the list of genera. Notes are also provided on recent advances in our understanding of asexual and sexual morph linkages in Dothideomycetes. A phylogenetic tree based on four gene analyses supported 23 orders and 75 families, while 35 families still lack molecular data.

SUBMITTER: Wijayawardene NN 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4896388 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Naming and outline of <i>Dothideomycetes</i>-2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names.

Wijayawardene Nalin N NN   Crous Pedro W PW   Kirk Paul M PM   Hawksworth David L DL   Boonmee Saranyaphat S   Braun Uwe U   Dai Dong-Qin DQ   D'souza Melvina J MJ   Diederich Paul P   Dissanayake Asha A   Doilom Mingkhuan M   Hongsanan Singang S   Jones E B Gareth EB   Groenewald Johannes Z JZ   Jayawardena Ruvishika R   Lawrey James D JD   Liu Jian-Kui JK   Lücking Robert R   Madrid Hugo H   Manamgoda Dimuthu S DS   Muggia Lucia L   Nelsen Matthew P MP   Phookamsak Rungtiwa R   Suetrong Satinee S   Tanaka Kazuaki K   Thambugala Kasun M KM   Wanasinghe Dhanushka N DN   Wikee Saowanee S   Zhang Ying Y   Aptroot André A   Ariyawansa H A HA   Bahkali Ali H AH   Bhat D Jayarama DJ   Gueidan Cécile C   Chomnunti Putarak P   De Hoog G Sybren GS   Knudsen Kerry K   Li Wen-Jing WJ   McKenzie Eric H C EH   Miller Andrew N AN   Phillips Alan J L AJ   Piątek Marcin M   Raja Huzefa A HA   Shivas Roger S RS   Slippers Bernad B   Taylor Joanne E JE   Tian Qing Q   Wang Yong Y   Woudenberg Joyce H C JH   Cai Lei L   Jaklitsch Walter M WM   Hyde Kevin D KD  

Fungal diversity 20141104 1


Article 59.1, of the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICN; Melbourne Code), which addresses the nomenclature of pleomorphic fungi, became effective from 30 July 2011. Since that date, each fungal species can have one nomenclaturally correct name in a particular classification. All other previously used names for this species will be considered as synonyms. The older generic epithet takes priority over the younger name. Any widely used younger names proposed for us  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6797652 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5904500 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5029491 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8359032 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4107892 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4941682 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4453240 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3195843 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA818158 | ENA
| S-EPMC8225607 | biostudies-literature