Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT).
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
Our prespecified dose-response analyses of A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) aim to provide practical guidance for clinicians on the timing, frequency, and amount of mobilization following acute stroke.Methods
Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had confirmed first (or recurrent) stroke, and were admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were randomized to receive very early and frequent mobilization, commencing within 24 hours, or usual care. We used regression analyses and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to investigate the effect of timing and dose of mobilization on efficacy and safety outcomes, irrespective of assigned treatment group.Results
A total of 2,104 patients were enrolled, of whom 2,083 (99.0%) were followed up at 3 months. We found a consistent pattern of improved odds of favorable outcome in efficacy and safety outcomes with increased daily frequency of out-of-bed sessions (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.18, p < 0.001), keeping time to first mobilization and mobilization amount constant. Increased amount (minutes per day) of mobilization reduced the odds of a good outcome (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, p < 0.001). Session frequency was the most important variable in the CART analysis, after prognostic variables age and baseline stroke severity.Conclusion
These data suggest that shorter, more frequent mobilization early after acute stroke is associated with greater odds of favorable outcome at 3 months when controlling for age and stroke severity.Classification of evidence
This study provides Class III evidence that shorter, more frequent early mobilization improves the chance of regaining independence after stroke.
SUBMITTER: Bernhardt J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4898313 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectivesWhile very early mobilisation (VEM) intervention for stroke patients was shown not to be effective at 3 months, 12 month clinical and economical outcomes remain unknown. The aim was to assess cost-effectiveness of a VEM intervention within a phase III randomised controlled trial (RCT).DesignAn economic evaluation alongside a RCT, and detailed resource use and cost analysis over 12 months post-acute stroke.SettingMulti-country RCT involved 58 stroke centres.Participants2104 patients with acute stroke who were admitted to a stroke unit.InterventionA very early rehabilitation intervention within 24 hours of stroke onset METHODS: Cost-utility analyses were undertaken according to pre-specified protocol measuring VEM against usual care (UC) based on 12 month outcomes. The analysis was conducted using both health sector and societal perspectives. Unit costs were sourced from participating countries. Details on resource use (both health and non-health) were sourced from cost case report form. Dichotomised modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (0 to 2 vs 3 to 6) and quality adjusted-life years (QALYs) were used to compare the treatment effect of VEM and UC. The base case analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis and 95% CI for cost and QALYs were estimated by bootstrapping. Sensitivity analysis were conducted to examine the robustness of base case results.ResultsVEM and UC groups were comparable in the quantity of resource use and cost of each component. There were no differences in the probability of achieving a favourable mRS outcome (0.030, 95% CI -0.022 to 0.082), QALYs (0.013, 95% CI -0.041 to 0.016) and cost (AUD1082, 95% CI -$2520 to $4685 from a health sector perspective or AUD102, 95% CI -$6907 to $7111, from a societal perspective including productivity cost). Sensitivity analysis achieved results with mostly overlapped CIs.ConclusionsVEM and UC were associated with comparable costs, mRS outcome and QALY gains at 12 months. Compared with to UC, VEM is unlikely to be cost-effective. The long-term data collection during the trial also informed resource use and cost of care post-acute stroke across five participating countries.Trial registration numberACTRN12606000185561; Results.
| S-EPMC6537993 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe purpose of this paper is to examine potential threats to generalisability of the results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial using data from A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT).DesignAVERT is a prospective, parallel group, assessor-blinded randomised clinical trial. This paper presents data assessing the generalisability of AVERT.SettingAcute stroke units at 44 hospitals in 8 countries.ParticipantsThe first 20,000 patients screened for AVERT, of whom 1158 were recruited and randomised.ModelWe use the Proximal Similarity Model, which considers the person, place, and setting and practice, as a framework for considering generalisability. As well as comparing the recruited patients with the target population, we also performed an exploratory analysis of the demographic, clinical, site and process factors associated with recruitment.ResultsThe demographics and stroke characteristics of the included patients in the trial were broadly similar to population-based norms, with the exception that AVERT had a greater proportion of men. The most common reason for non-recruitment was late arrival to hospital (ie, >24 h). Overall, being older and female reduced the odds of recruitment to the trial. More women than men were excluded for most of the reasons, including refusal. The odds of exclusion due to early deterioration were particularly high for those with severe stroke (OR=10.4, p<0.001, 95% CI 9.27 to 11.65).ConclusionsA model which explores person, place, and setting and practice factors can provide important information about the external validity of a trial, and could be applied to other clinical trials.Trial registration numberAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12606000185561) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01846247).
| S-EPMC4550737 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo report the number of participants needed to recruit per baby born to trial staff during AVERT, a large international trial on acute stroke, and to describe trial management consequences.DesignRetrospective observational analysis.Setting56 acute stroke hospitals in eight countries.Participants1074 trial physiotherapists, nurses, and other clinicians.Outcome measuresNumber of babies born during trial recruitment per trial participant recruited.ResultsWith 198 site recruitment years and 2104 patients recruited during AVERT, 120 babies were born to trial staff. Births led to an estimated 10% loss in time to achieve recruitment. Parental leave was linked to six trial site closures. The number of participants needed to recruit per baby born was 17.5 (95% confidence interval 14.7 to 21.0); additional trial costs associated with each birth were estimated at 5736 Australian dollars on average.ConclusionThe staff absences registered in AVERT owing to parental leave led to delayed trial recruitment and increased costs, and should be considered by trial investigators when planning research and estimating budgets. However, the celebration of new life became a highlight of the annual AVERT collaborators' meetings and helped maintain a cohesive collaborative group.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry no 12606000185561.DisclaimerParticipation in a rehabilitation trial does not guarantee successful reproductive activity.
| S-EPMC4676118 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesCongenital hemiplegia is the most common form of cerebral palsy (CP). Children with unilateral CP show signs of upper limb asymmetry by 8 months corrected age (ca) but are frequently not referred to therapy until after 12?months ca. This study compares the efficacy of infant-friendly modified constraint-induced movement therapy (Baby mCIMT) to infant friendly bimanual therapy (Baby BIM) on upper limb, cognitive and neuroplasticity outcomes in a multisite randomised comparison trial.Methods and analysis150 infants (75 in each group), aged between 3 and 6?months ca, with asymmetric brain injury and clinical signs of upper extremity asymmetry will be recruited. Children will be randomised centrally to receive equal doses of either Baby mCIMT or Baby BIM. Baby mCIMT comprises restraint of the unimpaired hand using a simple restraint (eg, glove, sock), combined with intensive parent implemented practice focusing on active use of the impaired hand in a play-based context. In contrast, Baby BIM promotes active play requiring both hands in a play-based context. Both interventions will be delivered by parents at home with monthly home visits and interim telecommunication support by study therapists. Assessments will be conducted at study entry; at 6, 12?months ca immediately postintervention (primary outcome) and 24?months ca (retention). The primary outcome will be the Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment. Secondary outcomes include the Bayley Scale for Infant and Toddler Development (cognitive and motor domains) and the Hand Assessment of Infants. A subset of children will undertake MRI scans at 24?months ca to evaluate brain lesion severity and brain (re)organisation after intervention.Ethics and disseminationFull ethical approvals for this study have been obtained from the relevant sites. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration numberAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12615000180516, Pre results.
| S-EPMC5623522 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIt is still unclear, which physiotherapeutic approaches are most effective in stroke recovery. Vojta therapy is a type of physiotherapy that was originally developed for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Vojta therapy has been reported to improve automatic control of body posture. Because acute stroke patients are characterised by a disturbance in the ability to adapt to changes in body position, requiring automatic postural adjustment, we decided to investigate Vojta therapy in the early rehabilitation of stroke patients. Aim of the trial was to test the hypothesis that Vojta therapy - as a new physiotherapeutic approach in early stroke recovery - improves postural control and motor function in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) or intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH).MethodsThis prospective, randomised controlled trial included patients with imaging-confirmed AIS or ICH, severe hemiparesis and randomly assigned them to Vojta therapy or standard physiotherapy within 72 h after stroke onset. Main exclusion criterion was restricted ability to communicate. Primary endpoint was the improvement of postural control measured by the Trunk Control Test (TCT) on day 9 after admission. Secondary endpoint among others was improvement of arm function (measured with Motor Evaluation Scale for Upper Extremity in Stroke Patients [MESUPES]).ResultsForty patients (20 per group) were randomised into the trial. Median age was 75 (66-80) years, 50% were women. The median improvement in TCT within 9 days was 25.5 points (=25.5%) (interquartile range [IQR] 12.5-42.5) in the Vojta group and 0 (IQR 0-13) in the control group (p = 0.001). Patients treated with Vojta therapy achieved a greater improvement in the MESUPES than patients in the control group (20% vs 10%, p = 0.006).ConclusionThis first randomised controlled trial of Vojta therapy in acute stroke patients demonstrates improvement of postural control through Vojta therapy compared to standard physiotherapy. Although this trial has some methodical weaknesses, Vojta therapy might be a promising approach in early stroke rehabilitation and should be studied in larger trials.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03035968. Registered 30 January 2017 - Retrospectively registered; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.
| S-EPMC7650119 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDose response has remained a priority area in motor rehabilitation research for decades, prompting several large randomized trials and meta-analyses. These between-subjects comparisons have revealed equivocal relationships between the duration of motor practice and rehabilitation response. Prior reliance on time-consuming clinical assessments made it infeasible to capture within-subjects dose response, as tracking the dose-response trajectory of an individual requires dozens of repeated administrations.MethodsThis secondary observational cohort analysis of existing data from the gaming arms of the VIGoROUS multisite trial (Video Game Rehabilitation for Outpatient Stroke) describes the rehabilitation dose response of 80 participants with mild-moderate chronic stroke. The 3-dimensional joint position data were captured via the Kinect v2 optical sensor as participants completed a prescribed 15 hours of in-home unsupervised game-based motor practice. Kinematic dose response trajectories were fitted from hundreds to thousands of in-game repetitions for 4 separate upper extremity movements for each participant.ResultsOf 75 participants with sufficient data for dose-response analysis, 85% showed improved motor capacity for at least 1 movement. Dose response was bimodal; 42% required <5 hours of motor practice before reaching a plateau in movement kinematics, whereas 55% required >10 and 34% required >30 hours. We could predict with 93% accuracy whether or not an individual would ultimately respond to game-based motor practice within 5 hours of gameplay.ConclusionsDose response varies considerably between individuals. About half of chronic stroke patients benefit from higher doses of motor practice than the current standard of care. Individualized dose-response data from motion capture rehabilitation gaming can guide clinical decision-making early on in treatment.RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02631850.
| S-EPMC10896190 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe effect of early intravenous (IV) beta-blockers (BBs) administration in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) on ST-segment deviation is unknown. We undertook a prespecified secondary analysis of the Early Beta-blocker Administration before primary PCI in patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (EARLY-BAMI) trial to investigate the effect of early IV BB on ST-segment deviation.MethodsThe EARLY-BAMI trial randomised patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to IV metoprolol (2×5?mg bolus) or matched placebo before pPCI. The prespecified outcome, evaluated by an independent core laboratory blinded to study treatment, was the residual ST-segment deviation 1?hour after pPCI (ie, the percentage of patients with >3?mm cumulative ST deviation at 1?hour after pPCI).ResultsAn ECG for the evaluation of residual ST-segment deviation 1?hour after pPCI was available in 442 out of 683 randomised patients. The BB group had a lower heart rate after pPCI compared with placebo (71.2±13.2 vs 74.3±13.6, p=0.016); however, no differences were noted in the percentages of patients with >3?mm cumulative ST deviation at 1?hour after pPCI (58.6% vs 54.1%, p=0.38, in BB vs placebo, respectively) neither a significant difference was found for the percentages of patients in each of the four prespecified groups (normalised ST-segment; 1-3?mm; 4-6?mm;>6?mm residual ST-deviation).ConclusionsIn patients with STEMI, who were being transported for primary PCI, early IV BB administration did not significantly affect ST-segment deviation after pPCI compared with placebo. The neutral result of early IV BB administration on an early marker of pharmacological effect is consistent with the absence of subsequent improvement of clinical outcomes.
| S-EPMC7737101 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWhether early reduction in albuminuria with atrasentan treatment predicts its long-term kidney-protective effect is unknown.MethodsTo assess the long-term effects on kidney outcomes of atrasentan versus placebo in the SONAR trial, we enrolled patients who had type 2 diabetes and CKD (stage 2-4) and a urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) of 300-5000 mg/g; participants were receiving maximum tolerated renin-angiotensin system inhibition. After 6 weeks exposure to 0.75 mg/day atrasentan (enrichment period), participants were randomized (stratified by UACR response during enrichment, ranging from ≤60% to >0%) to continue atrasentan or transition to placebo. Primary kidney outcome was a composite of sustained serum creatinine doubling or ESKD.ResultsUACR response to atrasentan during enrichment persisted throughout the double-blind treatment phase and predicted the primary kidney outcome, whereas UACR levels with placebo remained below pre-enrichment values in the two highest UACR response strata, and exceeded pre-enrichment values in the two lowest strata. As a result, early UACR response to atrasentan during enrichment was also associated with the primary kidney outcome during placebo. Accordingly, the predictive effect of early albuminuria changes during atrasentan was eliminated after placebo correction, leading to a consistent relative risk reduction for the primary kidney outcome with atrasentan compared with placebo, irrespective of the initial UACR response. The difference between atrasentan and placebo in UACR during double-blind treatment was also consistent across UACR response strata.ConclusionsOur findings do not support UACR response as a causal predictor of atrasentan's treatment effect. However, the variable trajectory in UACR with placebo, aspects of the trial design, day-to-day variability in albuminuria, and potential long-lasting effects of atrasentan may have contributed.
| S-EPMC8806086 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEarly clinical data showed that some patients with vasodilatory shock are responsive to low doses of angiotensin II. The objective of this analysis was to compare clinical outcomes in patients requiring ≤ 5 ng kg-1 min-1 angiotensin II at 30 min (≤ 5 ng kg-1 min-1 subgroup) to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 75 mmHg versus patients receiving > 5 ng kg-1 min-1 angiotensin II at 30 min (> 5 ng kg-1 min-1 subgroup). Data from angiotensin II-treated patients enrolled in the ATHOS-3 trial were used.ResultsThe subgroup of patients whose angiotensin II dose was down-titrated from 20 ng kg-1 min-1 at treatment initiation to ≤ 5 ng kg-1 min-1 at 30 min (79/163) had significantly lower endogenous serum angiotensin II levels and norepinephrine-equivalent doses and significantly higher MAP versus the > 5 ng kg-1 min-1 subgroup (84/163). Patients in the ≤ 5 ng kg-1 min-1 subgroup were more likely to have a MAP response at 3 h versus those in the > 5 ng kg-1 min-1 subgroup (90% vs. 51%, respectively; odds ratio, 8.46 [95% CI 3.63-19.7], P < 0.001). Day 28 survival was also higher in the ≤ 5 ng kg-1 min-1 subgroup versus the > 5 ng kg-1 min-1 subgroup (59% vs. 33%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI 0.28-0.72], P = 0.0007); multivariate analyses supported the survival benefit in patients with lower angiotensin II levels. The ≤ 5 ng kg-1 min-1 subgroup had a more favorable safety profile and lower treatment discontinuation rate than the > 5 ng kg-1 min-1 subgroup.ConclusionsThis prespecified analysis showed that down-titration to ≤ 5 ng kg-1 min-1 angiotensin II at 30 min is an early predictor of favorable clinical outcomes which may be related to relative angiotensin II insufficiency.
| S-EPMC6546778 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Importance:In the Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial, intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-reducing therapy with ezetimibe/simvastatin compared with simvastatin alone was associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular events in 18?144 patients after acute coronary syndrome. The safety of very low LDL-C levels over the long-term is unknown. Objective:To assess the safety and clinical efficacy of achieving a very low (<30 mg/dL) level of LDL-C at 1 month using data from the Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial. Design, Setting, and Participants:This prespecified analysis compared outcomes in patients stratified by achieved LDL-C level at 1 month in the Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial and adjusted for baseline characteristics during 6 years' median follow-up. Patients were enrolled from October 26, 2005, to July 8, 2010, and the data analysis was conducted from December 2014 to February 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures:Safety end points included adverse events leading to drug discontinuation; adverse muscle, hepatobiliary, and neurocognitive events; and hemorrhagic stroke, heart failure, cancer, and noncardiovascular death. Efficacy events were as specified in the overall trial. Results:Among the 15?281 patients included in the study, 11?645 (76.2%) were men and the median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 56.6-70.7 years). In these patients without an event in the first month, the achieved LDL-C values at 1 month were less than 30 mg/dL, 30 to 49 mg/dL, 50 to 69 mg/dL, and 70 mg/dL or greater in 6.4%, 31%, 36%, and 26% of patients, respectively. Patients with LDL-C values less than 30 mg/dL (median, 25 mg/dL; interquartile range, 21-27 mg/dL) at 1 month were more likely randomized to ezetimibe/simvastatin (85%), had lower baseline LDL-C values, and were more likely older, male, nonwhite, diabetic, overweight, statin naive, and presenting with a first myocardial infarction. After multivariate adjustment, there was no significant association between the achieved LDL-C level and any of the 9 prespecified safety events. The adjusted risk of the primary efficacy composite of cardiovascular death, major coronary events, or stroke was significantly lower in patients achieving an LDL-C level less than 30 mg/dL at 1 month (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91; P?=?.001) compared with 70 mg/dL or greater. Conclusions and Relevance:Patients achieving an LDL-C level less than 30 mg/dL at 1 month had a similar safety profile (and numerically the lowest rate of cardiovascular events) over a 6-year period compared with patients achieving higher LDL-C concentrations. These data provide reassurance regarding the longer-term safety and efficacy of the continuation of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in very higher-risk patients resulting in very low LDL-C levels. Trial Registration:clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00202878.
| S-EPMC5814987 | biostudies-literature