Dataset Information

Is Follow-Up Endoscopy Necessary in Upper Gastrointestinal Cytomegalovirus Disease?

ABSTRACT: Gastrointestinal (GI) cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Diagnosis of GI CMV disease mostly relies on endoscopy examination and histopathologic findings. There are limited data on the need for follow-up endoscopy with histopathologic examination in patients with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) CMV disease. All adult patients with confirmed and probable UGI CMV disease at a tertiary hospital over a 16-year period whose follow-up endoscopy was available were enrolled. The patients were classified as endoscopic responders if they showed complete or partial improvement on follow-up endoscopy, and as endoscopic nonresponders if there was no improvement or worsening. CMV tissue clearance was defined as absence of any visible CMV inclusion bodies, negative CMV immunohistochemistry and negative CMV polymerase chain reaction in follow-up biopsy tissues. During the study period, 77 patients with UGI CMV disease were analyzed. The median time to follow-up endoscopy was 19 days (interquartile range, 14-27). Of these 77 patients, 52 (68%) were classified as responders, and the remaining 25 (32%) as nonresponders. GI bleeding was more common in the nonresponders than the responders (36% vs 12%, respectively; P?=?0.02). There was no significant difference in CMV tissue clearance between the responders and nonresponders (56% vs 69%, respectively; P?=?0.38), median durations of treatment (20 days vs 21 days, respectively; P?=?0.48), and relapse rates (10% vs 8%, respectively; P?>?0.99). Multivariate analysis showed that the only independent predictive factor for relapse of CMV antigenemia or CMV GI disease was multiorgan CMV disease (odds ratio?=?12.4, 95% confidence interval 1.6-97.9; P?=?0.02). Endoscopic responses were obtained in about two-thirds of patients with UGI CMV disease 2 or 3 weeks after antiviral therapy. However, these follow-up endoscopic findings neither reflected CMV tissue clearance nor predicted disease relapse. These findings suggest that the routine follow-up endoscopy may not be warranted in patients with UGI CMV disease.

SUBMITTER: Seo M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4902479 | biostudies-literature | 2016 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Is Follow-Up Endoscopy Necessary in Upper Gastrointestinal Cytomegalovirus Disease?

Seo Myeongsook M Kim Do Hoon DH Gong Eun Jeong EJ Ahn Ji Yong JY Lee Jeong Hoon JH Jung Kee Wook KW Choi Kee Don KD Song Ho June HJ Lee Gin Hyug GH Jung Hwoon-Yong HY Kim Jin-Ho JH Lee Sang-Oh SO Choi Sang-Ho SH Kim Yang Soo YS Woo Jun Hee JH Kim Sung-Han SH

Medicine 20160501 19

Gastrointestinal (GI) cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Diagnosis of GI CMV disease mostly relies on endoscopy examination and histopathologic findings. There are limited data on the need for follow-up endoscopy with histopathologic examination in patients with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) CMV disease. All adult patients with confirmed and probable UGI CMV disease at a tertiary hospital over a 16-year period whose follow-up e ...[more]

PMID: 27175637

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundVideo capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a commonly used test for the evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. However, long-term outcomes of patients undergoing VCE are unclear.AimsTo evaluate the long-term outcomes in patients undergoing VCE for suspected obscure bleeding including iron deficiency anemia (IDA), and determine the need for additional intervention for persistence or recurrence of symptoms in patients with a diagnostic as well as non-diagnostic VCE.DesignRetrospective cohort study within a large county hospital system.MethodsWe collected information on indications and findings of VCE and outcomes including further testing, bleeding, and hemoglobin (Hgb) at last follow-up through structured review of the electronic health records. VCE findings were classified as active bleeding or high potential for bleeding (P2), intermediate potential (P1) or without any disruption of the mucosa, and no potential for bleeding (P0). We compared demographic and clinical characteristics between patients with and without normal Hgb at the time of last follow up.ResultsWe examined 116 patients who underwent VCEs performed for obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding during 2010 to 2012 with mean duration of follow up after VCE completion of 571 days (standard deviation [SD]?=?248). Abnormal VCE findings (37.9% for P1 lesions, 44.8% for P2 lesions) were seen in 106 (87.9%) patients. Additional diagnostic testing was performed in 55/116 (47.4%) (67.7% GI procedures). Hgb was restored to normal range in 59/116 (50.9%) by end of follow up which were attributed to iron supplementation and/or discontinuation of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in a majority. Twenty six of 116 patients experienced rebleeding (22.4%).ConclusionsThe diagnostic yield of VCE is high among patients with obscure GI bleeding. More than 50% of patients achieve normal Hgb in the long term with conservative measures such as iron supplementation and the discontinuation of NSAIDs.

Project description:BackgroundThe quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has been recently identified as a major priority being associated with many outcomes and patient's experience.ObjectiveTo assess adherence of endoscopists to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality performance measures for upper and lower GI endoscopy in Italy.MethodsAll endoscopist members of the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) were invited from October 2018 to December 2018 to participate to a self-administered questionnaire-based survey. The questionnaire included questions on demographics and professional characteristics, and the recent ESGE quality performance measures for upper and lower GI endoscopy.ResultsA total of 392 endoscopists participated in the study. Only a minority (18.2%) of participants recorded the duration of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and 51% provided accurate photo documentation in the minimum standard of 90% of cases. Almost all endoscopists correctly used Prague and Los Angeles classifications (87.8% and 98.2%, respectively), as well as Seattle and Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS) biopsy protocols (86.5% and 91.4%, respectively). However, only 52.8% of participants monitored complications after therapeutic EGD, and 40.8% recorded patients with a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE). With regard to colonoscopy, almost all endoscopists (93.9%) used the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale for measuring bowel preparation quality and reported a cecal intubation rate ≥90%. However, about a quarter (26.2%) of participants reported an adenoma detection rate of <25%, only 52.8% applied an appropriate polypectomy technique, 48% monitored complications after the procedure, and 12.4% measured patient's experience.ConclusionThe adherence of endoscopists to ESGE performance measures for GI endoscopy is sub-optimal in Italy. There is a need to disseminate and implement performance measures and endorse educational and scientific interventions on the quality of endoscopy.

Dataset Information

Is Follow-Up Endoscopy Necessary in Upper Gastrointestinal Cytomegalovirus Disease?

Publications

Is Follow-Up Endoscopy Necessary in Upper Gastrointestinal Cytomegalovirus Disease?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets