Dataset Information

Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a cost-utility analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The beneficial effects of endovascular treatment with new-generation mechanical thrombectomy devices compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone to treat acute large-artery ischemic stroke have been shown in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study aimed to estimate the cost utility of mechanical thrombectomy compared with the established standard of care.

Methods

We developed a Markov decision process analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of treatment with mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis versus treatment with intravenous thrombolysis alone from the public payer perspective in Canada. We conducted comprehensive literature searches to populate model inputs. We estimated the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis from a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs, and we used data from the Oxford Vascular Study to model long-term clinical outcomes. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) using a 5-year time horizon.

Results

The base case analysis showed the cost and effectiveness of treatment with mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis to be $126?939 and 1.484 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), respectively, and the cost and effectiveness of treatment with intravenous thrombolysis alone to be $124?419 and 1.273 QALYs, respectively. The mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis strategy was associated with an ICER of $11?990 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of treatment with mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis being cost-effective was 57.5%, 89.7% and 99.6% at thresholds of $20?000, $50?000 and $100?000 per QALY gained, respectively. The main factors influencing the ICER were time horizon, extra cost of mechanical thrombectomy treatment and age of the patient.

Interpretation

Mechanical thrombectomy as an adjunct therapy to intravenous thrombolysis is cost-effective compared with treatment with intravenous thrombolysis alone for patients with acute large-artery ischemic stroke.

SUBMITTER: Xie X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4933608 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Apr-Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a cost-utility analysis.

Xie Xuanqian X Lambrinos Anna A Chan Brian B Dhalla Irfan A IA Krings Timo T Casaubon Leanne K LK Lum Cheemun C Sikich Nancy N Bharatha Aditya A Pereira Vitor Mendes VM Stotts Grant G Saposnik Gustavo G O'Callaghan Christina C Kelloway Linda L Hill Michael D MD

CMAJ open 20160401 2

<h4>Background</h4>The beneficial effects of endovascular treatment with new-generation mechanical thrombectomy devices compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone to treat acute large-artery ischemic stroke have been shown in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study aimed to estimate the cost utility of mechanical thrombectomy compared with the established standard of care.<h4>Methods</h4>We developed a Markov decision process analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of treatment ...[more]

PMID: 27398380

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceTwo 2018 randomized controlled trials (DAWN and DEFUSE 3) demonstrated the clinical benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) more than 6 hours after onset in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Health-economic evidence is needed to determine whether the short-term health benefits of late MT translate to a cost-effective option during a lifetime in the United States.ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 strategies (MT added to standard medical care [SMC] vs SMC alone) for various subgroups of patients with AIS receiving care more than 6 hours after symptom onset.Design, setting, and participantsThis economic evaluation study used the results of the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials to populate a cost-effectiveness model from a US health care perspective combining a decision tree and Markov trace. The DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials enrolled 206 international patients from 2014 to 2017 and 182 US patients from 2016 to 2017, respectively. Patients were followed until 3 months after stroke. The clinical outcome at 3 months was available for 29 subgroups of patients with AIS and anterior circulation large vessel occlusions. Data analysis was conducted from July 2018 to October 2019.ExposuresMT with SMC in the extended treatment window vs SMC alone.Main outcomes and measuresExpected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) during lifetime were estimated. Deterministic results (incremental costs and effectiveness, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and net monetary benefit) were presented, and probabilistic analyses were performed for the total populations and 27 patient subgroups.ResultsIn the DAWN study, the MT group had a mean (SD) age of 69.4 (14.1) years and 42 of 107 (39.3%) were men, and the control group had a mean (SD) age of 70.7 (13.2) years and 51 of 99 (51.5%) were men. In the DEFUSE 3 study, the MT group had a median (interquartile range) age of 70 (59-79) years, and 46 of 92 (50.0%) were men, and the control group had a median (interquartile range) age of 71 (59-80) years, and 44 of 90 (48.9%) were men. For the total trial population, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $662/QALY and $13 877/QALY based on the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials, respectively. MT with SMC beyond 6 hours had a probability greater than 99.9% of being cost-effective vs SMC alone at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. Subgroup analyses showed a wide range of probabilities for MT with SMC to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY, with the greatest uncertainty observed for patients with a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of at least 16 and for those aged 80 years or older.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this study suggest that late MT added to SMC is cost-effective in all subgroups evaluated in the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials, with most results being robust in probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Future MT evidence-gathering could focus on older patients and those with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores of 16 and greater.

Project description:Background and purposeAcute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a common and life-threatening complication of patients with cardiac myxoma (CM). The role of the mechanical thrombectomy (MT) technique in CM-AIS patients remains unclear, and no guidelines exist for this population. Therefore, we conducted a case series study of MT in CM-AIS patients to investigate its safety and efficacy via a pooled analysis of published literature.MethodsEleven CM-AIS patients who underwent MT between 2016 and 2021 were screened from multicenter stroke databases. Clinical, procedural, and outcome data were obtained from medical records. A systematic review was conducted to identify additional cases from published studies by searching PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. We then performed a pooled analysis of the published cases.ResultsIn the case series study, most patients were male (81.8%), with a median age of 51 years. All patients had CM located in the left atrium. The rate of successful reperfusion using the first-line thrombectomy technique was 100% with stent retriever (SR) and 66.7% with direct aspiration (DA), which resulted in overall successful reperfusion in 94.1% of all occlusions. The retrieved emboli of the five patients who underwent histopathology examination were identified as myxoma components. Hemorrhagic transformation was observed in five (45.5%) patients, of whom one was symptomatic (9.1%). Three-month favorable functional outcomes were achieved in five (45.5%) patients with a 3-month mortality rate of 18.2%. For the literature review, 35 cases with 51 target vessel occlusions were identified and included in the pooled analysis. The rate of successful reperfusion following first-line thrombectomy did not differ between SR (30 patients, 90.9%) and DA (10 patients, 83.3%). The overall successful reperfusion rate was 91.8% of all occlusions. Three-month favorable functional outcomes were achieved in 21 (60.0%) patients, and the mortality rate was 8.6%.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that MT is not only an effective technique but also a safe option for CM-AIS patients with large vessel occlusion. MT has several advantages for this population, which include a high recanalization rate, low bleeding risk, and the ability to evaluate the source of emboli and the etiology of stroke.

Dataset Information

Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a cost-utility analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Interpretation

Publications

Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a cost-utility analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets