Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Constitutive Lck Activity Drives Sensitivity Differences between CD8+ Memory T Cell Subsets.


ABSTRACT: CD8(+) T cells develop increased sensitivity following Ag experience, and differences in sensitivity exist between T cell memory subsets. How differential TCR signaling between memory subsets contributes to sensitivity differences is unclear. We show in mouse effector memory T cells (TEM) that >50% of lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck) exists in a constitutively active conformation, compared with <20% in central memory T cells (TCM). Immediately proximal to Lck signaling, we observed enhanced Zap-70 phosphorylation in TEM following TCR ligation compared with TCM Furthermore, we observed superior cytotoxic effector function in TEM compared with TCM, and we provide evidence that this results from a lower probability of TCM reaching threshold signaling owing to the decreased magnitude of TCR-proximal signaling. We provide evidence that the differences in Lck constitutive activity between CD8(+) TCM and TEM are due to differential regulation by SH2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (Shp-1) and C-terminal Src kinase, and we use modeling of early TCR signaling to reveal the significance of these differences. We show that inhibition of Shp-1 results in increased constitutive Lck activity in TCM to levels similar to TEM, as well as increased cytotoxic effector function in TCM Collectively, this work demonstrates a role for constitutive Lck activity in controlling Ag sensitivity, and it suggests that differential activities of TCR-proximal signaling components may contribute to establishing the divergent effector properties of TCM and TEM. This work also identifies Shp-1 as a potential target to improve the cytotoxic effector functions of TCM for adoptive cell therapy applications.

SUBMITTER: Moogk D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4935560 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Constitutive Lck Activity Drives Sensitivity Differences between CD8+ Memory T Cell Subsets.

Moogk Duane D   Zhong Shi S   Yu Zhiya Z   Liadi Ivan I   Rittase William W   Fang Victoria V   Dougherty Janna J   Perez-Garcia Arianne A   Osman Iman I   Zhu Cheng C   Varadarajan Navin N   Restifo Nicholas P NP   Frey Alan B AB   Krogsgaard Michelle M  

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 20160606 2


CD8(+) T cells develop increased sensitivity following Ag experience, and differences in sensitivity exist between T cell memory subsets. How differential TCR signaling between memory subsets contributes to sensitivity differences is unclear. We show in mouse effector memory T cells (TEM) that >50% of lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck) exists in a constitutively active conformation, compared with <20% in central memory T cells (TCM). Immediately proximal to Lck signaling, we obser  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC1637592 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5447130 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6985454 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6636834 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2809813 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5130099 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6159972 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4017923 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4219087 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2275385 | biostudies-literature