Dataset Information

Evaluation of bioequivalence of five 0.1?mg dutasteride capsules compared to one 0.5?mg dutasteride capsule: a randomized study in healthy male volunteers.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the bioequivalence of five 0.1?mg dutasteride capsules to one 0.5?mg dutasteride capsule in healthy adult male subjects under fasting conditions. METHODS:This was a single-center, open-label, randomized, single dose, two-way cross-over study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01929330). Thirty-six healthy male subjects aged 18-65 years received 5?×?0.1?mg dutasteride softgel capsules and 1?×?0.5?mg dutasteride softgel capsule in a randomized order, with a minimum washout of 28 days between each drug administration. Serial blood samples were collected for the measurement of serum dutasteride concentrations by a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. Dutasteride pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC[0-t]) were compared between treatments. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS:Five 0.1?mg dutasteride capsules were demonstrated to be bioequivalent to 1?×?0.5?mg dutasteride capsule, as the 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC were within the accepted bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. The geometric least squares means ratios and associated 90% confidence intervals for 5?×?0.1?mg capsules vs 1?×?0.5?mg capsule were 1.01 (0.97-1.05) for Cmax and 0.91 (0.84-1.00) for AUC(0-t). Adverse events (AEs) were reported for 42% (15/36) and 36% (12/33) of subjects in the 5?×?0.1?mg and 1?×?0.5?mg dosing sessions, respectively. The most frequent AE for both treatments was headache. No subject had a serious AE. CONCLUSIONS:Five 0.1?mg dutasteride capsules were shown to be bioequivalent to one 0.5?mg dutasteride capsule in healthy adult male subjects under fasted conditions, suggesting that the two dose strengths can be interchanged. Both treatments were generally well tolerated in healthy male subjects.

SUBMITTER: Fossler MJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4937626 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of bioequivalence of five 0.1 mg dutasteride capsules compared to one 0.5 mg dutasteride capsule: a randomized study in healthy male volunteers.

Fossler Michael J MJ Collins David A DA Ino Hiroko H Sarai Nobuaki N Ravindranath Ramiya R Bowen Chester L CL Burns Olivia O

Journal of drug assessment 20150714 1

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the bioequivalence of five 0.1 mg dutasteride capsules to one 0.5 mg dutasteride capsule in healthy adult male subjects under fasting conditions.<h4>Methods</h4>This was a single-center, open-label, randomized, single dose, two-way cross-over study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01929330). Thirty-six healthy male subjects aged 18-65 years received 5 × 0.1 mg dutasteride softgel capsules and 1 × 0.5 mg dutasteride softgel capsule in a randomized order, with a mini ...[more]

PMID: 27536459

Similar Datasets

Project description:UnlabelledThe present study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of febuxostat in healthy Chinese male volunteers and evaluate whether the two formulations of febuxostat 40-mg and 80-mg tablets are bioequivalent. A randomized, open-label, 4-way crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers under fasting conditions. 24 eligible subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of test or reference formulation of febuxostat 40-mg or 80-mg tablet. The washout period between each administration was 1 week. Plasma febuxostat was quantified by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Tolerability was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, physical examinations, 12-lead ECG and laboratory tests. After single-dosing of 1 tablet of 40-mg febuxostat, the pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference formulations were: Tmax 1.22±0.87 and 1.85±1.03 h, Cmax 1689.16±461.31 and 1613.80±608.43 ng·mL-1, AUC0-t 5139.87±1349.28 and 5517.91±2024.26 ng·mL-1·h, AUC0-∞ 5263.06±1339.16 and 5640.48±2040.22 ng·mL-1·h, t1/2 4.82±2.61 and 4.85±1.78 h, respectively. After single-dosing of 1 tablet of 80-mg febuxostat, the pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference formulations were: Tmax 1.71±1.21 and 2.23±1.55 h, Cmax 2744.47±1157.44 and 2998.17±1200.13 ng·mL-1, AUC0-t 9634.03±2768.25 and 10467.95±3501.65 ng·mL-1·h, AUC0-∞ 9834.32±2730.51 and 10626.63±3504.08 ng·mL-1·h, t1/2 6.25±2.44 and 5.46±1.65 h, respectively. For single-dosing of 1 tablet of 40-mg febuxostat, 90% CIs for the test/reference ratio of AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 89.79 to 102.55, 90.14 to 102.56 and 93.99 to 129.63, respectively. For single-dosing of 1 tablet of 80-mg febuxostat, 90% CIs for the test/reference ratio of AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 86.67 to 100.00, 87.50 to 100.51 and 79.48 to 105.99, respectively. This single dose study revealed similar pharmacokinetic properties in healthy Chinese male volunteers as those found in Caucasic population. The test and reference febuxostat tablets formulations met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence at 40-mg and 80-mg strengths in fasting healthy Chinese male volunteers.Trial registrationChictr.org ChiCTR-TTRCC-14004288.

Project description:Background and objectiveA novel tiotropium bromide monodose capsule dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulation and device have been developed. The formulation was based on a spray-dried matrix that enhances the aerosolizaton properties, allowing a less active tiotropium metered dose (13 µg/capsule) while maintaining the same delivered dose (10 µg/actuation). This study describes the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence to the reference product.MethodsThis randomized, two-stage, crossover, semi-replicate (three-way) study was performed in healthy volunteers. In each study period, subjects received a single dose of two capsules (20 μg delivered dose) of the study medication, separated by a 14-day washout period: tiotropium 10 μg delivered dose (Laboratorios Liconsa, Spain) and Spiriva HandiHaler(®) (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Germany). Blood samples were obtained up to 48 h post-dose to evaluate the comparative bioavailability. Tiotropium was measured in plasma by means of dual stage liquid-liquid extraction followed by the two-dimensional ultra-high performance liquid chromatography sensitive sub-pg/mL bioanalytical method. The main pharmacokinetic parameters were maximum plasma concentration (C max), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero hours to the last observed concentration at time t (AUC t ), and AUC from time zero hours to 30 min (AUC0.5). Bioequivalence was accepted if the 90.20 % confidence interval (CI) for the ratio test/reference of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters lay within the acceptance range of 80-125 %. Safety assessment was a secondary endpoint.ResultsA total of 30 subjects were randomized and bioequivalence was demonstrated for all primary pharmacokinetic parameters: C max (CI 87.26-106.60 %), AUC t (CI 101.33-111.64 %), and AUC0.5 (CI 97.95-113.49 %). Both study treatments were well tolerated (four non-serious adverse events [AEs] were reported in four subjects: one AE before any product administration, two AEs after test product administration; and one AE after reference product administration).ConclusionsBoth products containing tiotropium 10 µg delivered-dose DPI were bioequivalent and showed good tolerability and a similar safety profile.

Project description:Purpose:To demonstrate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) equivalence of a biosimilar enoxaparin to the reference drug, and to assess its safety and tolerability in healthy volunteers. Patients and methods:A randomized, double-blind, crossover, 2-sequence, single-dose study was conducted in healthy volunteers of both sexes. Participants were sequentially and randomly administered single subcutaneous injections of enoxaparin 100 mg manufactured by Rovi (test; Madrid, Spain) and Clexane® (enoxaparin 100 mg manufactured by Sanofi, reference) separated by a 1-week washout period. The primary PK/PD variables were maximum activity (Amax) and area under the effect curve from time 0 to the last measured activity (T) (AUEC0-T) and AUEC from time 0 to infinity (AUEC0-inf) of anti-FXa activity, and Amax and AUEC0-T of anti-FIIa activity. Secondary variables were Amax and AUEC0-T, AUEC0-inf of tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and the ratio of AUEC0-T anti-FXa to anti-FIIa activity. Biosimilarity would be shown when the 95% CI of the ratio of geometric least squares means (95% CI RGLSMs) of primary PK/PD parameters fell within the standard range of bioequivalence, ie, 80%-125%. Results:The study sample consisted of 46 volunteers (33 males) aged 18-44 years and with body mass index ranging from 19.0 to 31.1 kg/m2. Three subjects did not complete the study. The curves of anti-FXa, anti-FIIa and tissue factor pathway inhibitor activities corresponding to administration of the test and reference products were comparable. The 95% CI RGLSMs of Amax, AUEC0-T and AUEC0-inf for anti-FXa activity were 94.6%-105.9%, 99.8%-108.0% and 100.0%-108.6% respectively; Amax and AUEC0-T for anti-FIIa activity were 94.7%-112.6% and 90.9%-117.9% respectively. In addition, the 95% CI RGLSMs of all secondary variables fell within the range 80%-125%. The incidence and types of adverse events after administration of the test and reference drugs were similar. Conclusion:The results conclusively showed that the enoxaparin manufactured by Rovi is equivalent to the reference enoxaparin in all primary and secondary PK/PD parameters, as required by the European Medicines Agency to grant marketing authorization to a biosimilar low molecular-weight heparin.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of bioequivalence of five 0.1?mg dutasteride capsules compared to one 0.5?mg dutasteride capsule: a randomized study in healthy male volunteers.

Publications

Evaluation of bioequivalence of five 0.1 mg dutasteride capsules compared to one 0.5 mg dutasteride capsule: a randomized study in healthy male volunteers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure