Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Assessment of the impact of scheduled postmarketing safety summary analyses on regulatory actions.

ABSTRACT: In addition to standard postmarketing drug safety monitoring, Section 915 of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA) requires the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct a summary analysis of adverse event reports to identify risks of a drug or biologic product 18 months after product approval, or after 10,000 patients have used the product, whichever is later. We assessed the extent to which these analyses identified new safety signals and resultant safety-related label changes. Among 458 newly approved products, 300 were the subjects of a scheduled analysis; a new safety signal that resulted in a safety-related label change was found for 11 of these products. Less than 2% of 713 safety-related label changes were based on the scheduled analyses. Our study suggests that the safety summary analyses provide only marginal value over other pharmacovigilance activities.

SUBMITTER: Sekine S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4943082 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Assessment of the impact of scheduled postmarketing safety summary analyses on regulatory actions.

Sekine S S Pinnow E E EE Wu E E Kurtzig R R Hall M M Dal Pan G J GJ

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 20160331 1

In addition to standard postmarketing drug safety monitoring, Section 915 of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA) requires the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct a summary analysis of adverse event reports to identify risks of a drug or biologic product 18 months after product approval, or after 10,000 patients have used the product, whichever is later. We assessed the extent to which these analyses identified new safety signals and resultant safety-relat ...[more]

PMID: 26853718

Similar Datasets

Postmarketing Safety-Related Regulatory Actions for New Therapeutic Biologics Approved in the United States 2002-2014: Similarities and Differences With New Molecular Entities.

Project description:We examined the relationship of regulatory and review characteristics to postmarketing safety-related regulatory actions for 61 new therapeutic biologics (NTBs) approved between October 1, 2002 and December 31, 2014. We also compared NTBs with small-molecule new molecular entities (NMEs) on these measures. Postmarketing safety-related regulatory actions were defined as a safety-related withdrawal or a safety-related update to a safety section of the label through June 30, 2018. Four NTBs were withdrawn, two for safety reasons. At least one safety-related update was added to the labels of 54 (88.5%) NTBs. Label updates occurred throughout the follow-up period. Time to the first safety-related regulatory action was shorter for NTBs approved under accelerated approval. The occurrence of safety events was more likely to occur with NTBs than with NMEs. This may be explained in part by the higher proportion of NTBs in the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification categories with higher frequency of safety-related updates. NTBs also had shorter time to safety events than NMEs. These findings underscore the importance of continued development of the life cycle safety surveillance system for both drugs and biologics with consideration for product type and its characteristics, including pharmacologic action.

| S-EPMC8159207 | biostudies-literature

Monitoring product safety in the postmarketing environment.

Project description:The safety profile of a medicinal product may change in the postmarketing environment. Safety issues not identified in clinical development may be seen and need to be evaluated. Methods of evaluating spontaneous adverse experience reports and identifying new safety risks include a review of individual reports, a review of a frequency distribution of a list of the adverse experiences, the development and analysis of a case series, and various ways of examining the database for signals of disproportionality, which may suggest a possible association. Regulatory agencies monitor product safety through a variety of mechanisms including signal detection of the adverse experience safety reports in databases and by requiring and monitoring risk management plans, periodic safety update reports and postauthorization safety studies. The United States Food and Drug Administration is working with public, academic and private entities to develop methods for using large electronic databases to actively monitor product safety. Important identified risks will have to be evaluated through observational studies and registries.

| S-EPMC4125313 | biostudies-literature

Clinical Trial and Postmarketing Safety of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Therapy.

Project description:IntroductionThis is the first description of safety data for intravenous onasemnogene abeparvovec, the only approved systemically administered gene-replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy.ObjectiveWe comprehensively assessed the safety of intravenous onasemnogene abeparvovec from preclinical studies, clinical studies, and postmarketing data.MethodsSingle-dose toxicity studies were performed in neonatal mice and juvenile or neonatal cynomolgus nonhuman primates (NHPs). Data presented are from a composite of preclinical studies, seven clinical trials, and postmarketing sources (clinical trials, n = 102 patients; postmarketing surveillance, n = 665 reported adverse event [AE] cases). In clinical trials, safety was assessed through AE monitoring, vital-sign and cardiac assessments, laboratory evaluations, physical examinations, and concomitant medication use. AE reporting and available objective clinical data from postmarketing programs were evaluated.ResultsThe main target organs of toxicity in mice were the heart and liver. Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) inflammation was observed in NHPs. Patients exhibited no evidence of sensory neuropathy upon clinical examination. In clinical trials, 101/102 patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent AE. In total, 50 patients experienced serious AEs, including 11 considered treatment related. AEs consistent with hepatotoxicity resolved with prednisolone in clinical trials. Transient decreases in mean platelet count were detected but were without bleeding complications. Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) was observed in the postmarketing setting. No evidence of intracardiac thrombi was observed for NHPs or patients.ConclusionsRisks associated with onasemnogene abeparvovec can be anticipated, monitored, and managed. Hepatotoxicity events resolved with prednisolone. Thrombocytopenia was transient. TMA may require medical intervention. Important potential risks include cardiac AEs and DRG toxicity.

| S-EPMC8473343 | biostudies-literature

A critical review of methods to evaluate the impact of FDA regulatory actions.

Project description:To conduct a synthesis of the literature on methods to evaluate the impacts of FDA regulatory actions and identify best practices for future evaluations.We searched MEDLINE for manuscripts published between January 1948 and August 2011 that included terms related to FDA, regulatory actions, and empirical evaluation; the review additionally included FDA-identified literature. We used a modified Delphi method to identify preferred methodologies. We included studies with explicit methods to address threats to validity and identified designs and analytic methods with strong internal validity that have been applied to other policy evaluations.We included 18 studies out of 243 abstracts and papers screened. Overall, analytic rigor in prior evaluations of FDA regulatory actions varied considerably; less than a quarter of studies (22%) included control groups. Only 56% assessed changes in the use of substitute products/services, and 11% examined patient health outcomes. Among studies meeting minimal criteria of rigor, 50% found no impact or weak/modest impacts of FDA actions and 33% detected unintended consequences. Among those studies finding significant intended effects of FDA actions, all cited the importance of intensive communication efforts. There are preferred methods with strong internal validity that have yet to be applied to evaluations of FDA regulatory actions.Rigorous evaluations of the impact of FDA regulatory actions have been limited and infrequent. Several methods with strong internal validity are available to improve trustworthiness of future evaluations of FDA policies.

| S-EPMC3825208 | biostudies-literature

Safety of ?2-Agonists in Asthma: Linking Mechanisms, Meta-Analyses and Regulatory Practice.

Project description:An epidemic of asthma fatalities in the 1970s prompted a series of case-control studies which indicated that short acting ?-agonists increased the risk of death. Subsequent mechanistic and pharmacodynamic studies have suggested that ?-agonist monotherapy facilitates airway inflammation, although when co-administered with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), similar evidence is lacking. The Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial, which revealed a fourfold increase in asthma-related deaths in salmeterol-treated patients, prompted a paradigm shift in the evidential assessment of ?-agonist safety. The FDA's meta-analysis of over 60,000 patients ultimately concluded that long-acting ?-agonist (LABA) therapy increased the risk of serious asthma-related events. However, this meta-analysis itself raised questions given a large body of omitted data and a limited emphasis on the risk of ICS-LABA co-administration. Subsequently, the FDA mandated the conduct of five large studies to definitively ascertain whether ICS-LABAs increase asthma-related risk. Whether this ambitious programme will provide certainty remains to be seen given issues of multiplicity, the very low frequency of fatal and near-fatal asthma, and the administration of a free combination of ICS and LABA in one trial. The FDA's de facto use of FEV1 as a safety parameter, based on findings from the Foradil NDA, is a further topical issue: subsequent clinical study data, considerations relating to regional pulmonary drug deposition and pharmacological differences between different ?-agonists suggest that FEV1 may be a suboptimal safety metric. Models evaluating airway inflammation and bronchial reactivity may be more appropriate to assess the relative risk of asthma-related events.

| S-EPMC4406964 | biostudies-other

Safety and effectiveness of apixaban in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: A regulatory postmarketing surveillance, the STANDARD study.

Project description:Background:Apixaban, a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC), was approved in Japan in 2012 for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, the safety and effectiveness of apixaban in clinical practice have not yet been elucidated thoroughly among Japanese NVAF patients. Methods:A postmarketing surveillance study was conducted to determine the safety and effectiveness of apixaban. Patients were followed-up for 104 weeks. Outcome events included adverse drug reactions (ADRs), hemorrhages, and thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism [SE], and transient ischemic attack [TIA]). Results:Among 6306 NVAF patients in the safety analysis set (age, 74.5 ± 10.1 years; women, 41.1%; and CHADS 2 score, 2.0 ± 1.4), 3600 patients (57.1%) received the standard dose (5 mg twice daily) and 2694 (42.7%) received a reduced dose (2.5 mg twice daily) of apixaban. ADRs occurred in 604 patients (9.58%), with the most common being epistaxis (0.86%), subcutaneous hemorrhage (0.67%), and hematuria (0.57%). Incidence rate of any hemorrhages and major hemorrhage was 5.52% per year and 2.36% per year, respectively. Incidence rate of ischemic stroke/SE/TIA was 1.00% per year among 6286 patients in the effectiveness analysis set. Among three subgroups (3106 apixaban initiators, 2038 patients switched from warfarin, and 1118 patients switched from other NOACs), incidence rates of major hemorrhage (P = 0.221 for trend) and ischemic stroke/SE/TIA (P = 0.686 for trend) were comparable. Conclusions:No new safety signals of apixaban were identified in Japanese NVAF patients. Safety and effectiveness of apixaban were consistent with those in the ARISTOTLE study.

| S-EPMC6595349 | biostudies-literature

Postmarketing surveillance on the clinical use of edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (ETNA-AF-Japan): One-year safety and effectiveness analyses.

Project description:BackgroundThe safety and effectiveness of edoxaban in real-world clinical settings have not yet been elucidated thoroughly among Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We report the one-year interim results of ETNA-AF-Japan (Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice in patients with nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: UMIN000017011), an ongoing two-year study.MethodsETNA-AF-Japan is a prospective, real-world multicenter observational study that analyzes the long-term safety and effectiveness of edoxaban. Physicians recorded clinical characteristics, bleeding events, and clinical events of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, among others.ResultsIn total, 11 569 patients with NVAF were enrolled. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients in the safety analysis set (n = 11 107) were a mean age of 74.2 ± 10.0 years; female sex, 40.6%; age ≥75 years, 52.4%; body weight ≤60 kg, 54.3%; creatinine clearance ≤50 mL/min, 31.2%; mean CHADS2 score of 2.2 ± 1.3. The mean treatment period was 311.2 days (median; 366.0 days), and ~80% of patients continued edoxaban treatment. In the safety analysis, the incidence of all bleeding events was 6.32% [95% CI: 5.87, 6.79] (n = 702), and for major bleeding, it was 1.08% [0.90, 1.29] (n = 120). In the effectiveness analysis set (n = 11 059), the incidence of ischemic stroke (excluding TIA) or systemic embolism was 1.10% [0.92, 1.32] (n = 122).ConclusionsAt one-year follow-up, the results showed no major concerns about the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban in Japanese patients with NVAF in a real-world clinical setting.

| S-EPMC7279995 | biostudies-literature

A safety screening platform for individualized cardiotoxicity assessment

Project description:Cardiotoxicity remains a major cause of drug withdrawal, partially due to lacking predictability of animal models. Additionally, risk of cardiotoxicity following treatment of cancer patients is treatment limiting. It is unclear which patients will develop heart failure following therapy. Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes present an unlimited cell source and may offer individualized solutions to this problem. We developed a platform to predict molecular and functional aspects of cardiotoxicity. Our platform can discriminate between the different cardiotoxic mechanisms of existing and novel anthracyclines Doxorubicin (DOXO), Aclarubicin (ACLA) and Amrubicin (AMR). DOXO and ACLA unlike AMR substantially affected the transcriptome, mitochondrial membrane integrity, contractile force and transcription factor availability. Cardiomyocytes recovered fully within two or three weeks, corresponding to the intermittent clinical treatment regimen. Our system permits the study of hPSC-cardiomyocyte recovery and the effects of accumulated dose after multiple dosing, allowing individualized cardiotoxicity evaluation, which effects millions of cancer patients treated with anthracyclines annually.

2023-10-01 | GSE232331 | GEO

Safety considerations for IMRT: Executive summary.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC3808751 | biostudies-literature

Safety considerations for IGRT: Executive summary.

Project description:Radiation therapy is an effective cancer treatment that is constantly being transformed by technological innovation. Dedicated devices for fraction-by-fraction imaging and guidance within the treatment room have enabled image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) allowing clinicians to pursue highly conformal dose distributions, higher dose prescriptions, and shorter fractionation schedules. Capitalizing on IGRT-enabled accuracy and precision requires a strong link between IGRT practices and planning target volume (PTV) design. This is clearly central to high quality, safe radiation therapy. Failure to properly apply IGRT methods or to coordinate their use with an appropriate PTV margin can result in a treatment that is 'precisely wrong'. The white paper summarized in this executive summary recommends foundational elements and specific activities to maximize the safety and effectiveness of IGRT.

| S-EPMC3808747 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data