Dataset Information

Post-Marketing Surveillance of Human Rabies Diploid Cell Vaccine (Imovax) in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the United States, 1990?2015.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In 1980, human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV, Imovax Rabies, Sanofi Pasteur), was licensed for use in the United States.

Objective

To assess adverse events (AEs) after HDCV reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting surveillance system.

Methods

We searched VAERS for US reports after HDCV among persons vaccinated from January 1, 1990-July 31, 2015. Medical records were requested for reports classified as serious (death, hospitalization, prolonged hospitalization, disability, life-threatening-illness), and those suggesting anaphylaxis and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Physicians reviewed available information and assigned a primary clinical category to each report using MedDRA system organ classes. Empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining was used to identify disproportional AE reporting after HDCV.

Results

VAERS received 1,611 reports after HDCV; 93 (5.8%) were serious. Among all reports, the three most common AEs included pyrexia (18.2%), headache (17.9%), and nausea (16.5%). Among serious reports, four deaths appeared to be unrelated to vaccination.

Conclusions

This 25-year review of VAERS did not identify new or unexpected AEs after HDCV. The vast majority of AEs were non-serious. Injection site reactions, hypersensitivity reactions, and non-specific constitutional symptoms were most frequently reported, similar to findings in pre-licensure studies.

SUBMITTER: Moro PL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4943633 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Post-Marketing Surveillance of Human Rabies Diploid Cell Vaccine (Imovax) in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the United States, 1990‒2015.

Moro Pedro L PL Woo Emily Jane EJ Paul Wendy W Lewis Paige P Petersen Brett W BW Cano Maria M

PLoS neglected tropical diseases 20160713 7

<h4>Background</h4>In 1980, human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV, Imovax Rabies, Sanofi Pasteur), was licensed for use in the United States.<h4>Objective</h4>To assess adverse events (AEs) after HDCV reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting surveillance system.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched VAERS for US reports after HDCV among persons vaccinated from January 1, 1990-July 31, 2015. Medical records were requested for reports classified as serious (death, ...[more]

PMID: 27410239

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundVaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) was established in the United States (U.S.) as an early warning system with a main purpose of collecting post-marketing Adverse events following immunizations (AEFIs) reports to monitor the vaccine safety and to mitigate the risks from vaccines. During the coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, VAERS got more attention as its important role in monitoring the safety of the vaccines. The aim of this study was to investigate VAERS patterns, reported AEFI, vaccines, and impact of different pandemics since its inception.MethodsThis was an observational study using VARES data from 2/7/1990 to 12/11/2021. Patterns of reports over years were first described, followed by a comparison of reports statistics per year. Furthermore, a comparison of incidents (death, ER visits, etc.) statistics over years, in addition to statistics of each vaccine were calculated. Moreover, each incident's statistics for each vaccine were calculated and top vaccines were reported. All analyses were conducted using R (Version 1.4.1717) and Excel for Microsoft 365.ResultsThere were 1,396,280 domestic and 346,210 non-domestic reports during 1990-2021, including 228 vaccines. For both domestic and non-domestic reports, year of 2021 had the highest reporting rate (48.52 % and 70.33 %), in addition a notable change in AEFIs patterns were recorded during 1991, 1998, 2000, 2006, 2009, 2011, and 2017. AEFIs were as follow: deaths (1.00 % and 4.08 %), ER or doctor visits (13.37 % and 2.27 %), hospitalizations (5.84 % and 27.78 %), lethal threat (1.42 % and 4.38 %), and disabilities (1.4 % and 7.96 %). Pyrexia was the top reported symptom during the past 31 years, except for 2021 where headache was the top one. COVID-19 vaccines namely Moderna, Pfizer-Biontech, and Janssen were the top 3 reported vaccines with headache, pyrexia, and fatigue as the top associated AEFIs. Followed by Zoster, Seasonal Influenza, Pneumococcal, and Human papillomavirus vaccines.ConclusionsThe large data available in VARES make it a useful tool for detecting and monitoring vaccine AEFIs. However, its usability relies on understating the limitations of this surveillance system, the impact of governmental regulations, availability of vaccines, and public health recommendations on the reporting rate.

Project description:IntroductionTETRAXIM™ (Sanofi), a combined diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and inactivated poliovirus (DTaP-IPV) vaccine, has been licensed in South Korea since 2009. In accordance with the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety regulations, this post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study evaluated the safety of the DTaP-IPV vaccine in real-world clinical practice in infants and children who received it as either a part of the three-dose primary series dose at 2, 4, and 6 months or school entry booster between 4 and 6 years of age.MethodsThis multicenter, observational, PMS study was conducted in real-world practice in South Korea for 6 years (2009-2015) in participants aged between 2 months and 6 years. The study outcomes included solicited reactions, unsolicited adverse events (AEs)/adverse drug reactions (ADRs), unexpected AEs/ADRs, and serious AEs (SAEs)/ADRs.ResultsData from 647 participants was included in the safety analysis. Overall, 268 AEs were reported by 181 (28%) participants: 47 (17.5%) solicited reactions, 220 (82.1%) unsolicited AEs, and 1 (0.4%) unsolicited ADR. A total of 48 AEs (including 47 solicited reactions) were reported to have a causal relationship with the DTaP-IPV vaccine and were reported by 36 (5.6%) participants. A total of 212 unexpected AEs were reported by 152 (23.5%) participants, none of which had a causal relationship with the DTaP-IPV vaccine. Neither immediate AEs nor SAEs were reported during the study. Among the participants who reported AEs, 220 (34%) were on concomitant medications. Most AEs were of mild intensity, and all participants recovered.ConclusionNo safety concerns related to the DTaP-IPV vaccine in a real-world setting were raised in participants aged 2-6 months for the primary series and 4-6 years for the school-entry booster dose in the Korean population. The DTaP-IPV vaccine was well tolerated and can be continued as part of routine immunization programs in infants and children.Trial registrationNCT01437423.

Project description:Highlights • Active post-marketing safety surveillance on ROTASIIL, an oral rotavirus vaccine, was conducted in 9940 infants in India.• Three doses of ROTASIIL were administered at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age, along with other EPI vaccines.• Most of the AEs were pyrexia and injection site reactions caused by the concomitant injectable vaccines.• No case of intussusception (IS) was reported.• ROTASIIL was safe and well tolerated. Background ROTASIIL, an oral live attenuated bovine-human reassortant pentavalent rotavirus vaccine, was approved in 2017. This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was conducted to collect real-world data on the safety of ROTASIIL in India. Methods Observational, active PMS was conducted in approximately 10,000 infants aged ≥ 6 weeks. ROTASIIL was administered as a 3-dose regimen, at least 4 weeks apart, beginning at ≥ 6 weeks of age concomitantly with other Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) vaccines. Participants were followed for one month after the last dose. The adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), including intussusception (IS) reported during the follow up period were collected. Findings A total of 9940 infants were enrolled and were considered for safety analysis. Around 9913 (99.7 %) infants received 2 doses, while 9893 (99.5 %) infants completed all three doses. Total 3693 AEs were reported in 2516 (25.3 %) participants. Most of these AEs were pyrexia (78.01 % of events) and injection-site reactions (19.14 % of events). Nearly all AEs were causally unrelated to orally administered ROTASIIL and could be caused by the concomitant injectable vaccines. Only 4 AEs (2 events of vomiting and 1 event each of discomfort and pyrexia) in 4 (<0.1 %) participants could be related to ROTASIIL. AEs were of mild or moderate severity and all resolved without any sequelae. A total of 2 SAEs (acute otitis media and skull fracture) were reported in 2 (<0.1 %) participants and were not related to ROTASIIL and recovered without sequelae. No case of IS was reported. Interpretation ROTASIIL was safe and well tolerated in this study. No safety concerns were reported. Funding The study was funded by SIIPL which is the manufacturer of the study product.

Project description:BackgroundA vero cell-based inactivated Rabies Vaccine (Rabivax-S) and Rabies Human Monoclonal Antibody (Rabishield) have been approved since 2016. A post-marketing surveillance was conducted in India from 2020 to 2021 to gather real world safety data on Rabivax-S and Rabishield.MethodsThis was non-interventional active surveillance in patients with category III potential rabies exposure who were administered a post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimen (Rabishield and Rabivax-S) by their healthcare providers (HCPs) as per the dosages and regimens mentioned in the package insert approved by the Indian regulators. The approved schedule for PEP was local infiltration of Rabishield on Day 0 and five doses of Rabivax-S on Day 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28 (Intramuscular route, IM) or four doses of Rabivax-S on Day 0, 3, 7, and 28 (Intradermal route, ID). The primary objective of this surveillance was to generate real-world evidence on the safety and tolerability of Rabishield and Rabivax-S. All patients enrolled in the surveillance were required to report any adverse events (AEs) occurring up to Day 31 after initiation of PEP (administration of Rabishield and the first dose of Rabivax-S) to their HCP.FindingsA total of 1000 patients with category III potential rabies exposure were enrolled across India. 991 patients received the PEP regimen with IM Rabivax-S while 9 received a PEP regimen with the ID regimen. While 32% of the patients were <12 years of age, 11.8% were ≥12 to <18 years of age and 56.2% were ≥18 years of age. The entire PEP regimen was completed by 97.3% of the enrolled patients. A total of 69 AEs were reported in 64 patients. Out of these, 49 AEs in 47 patients were assessed as causally related to the study products (26 with Rabishield and 23 with Rabivax-S). The majority of the AEs were mild and all recovered without any sequelae. One serious adverse event (SAE) of fracture of the hand was reported which was not related to either Rabishield or Rabivax-S. No case of rabies was reported.InterpretationRabishield and Rabivax-S have an excellent safety profile and are well tolerated. No participant developed rabies during 31 day follow up.FundingThe PMS was funded by Serum institute of India Private Limited which is the manufacturer of the study products.