Dataset Information

In vivo, high-frequency three-dimensional cardiac MR elastography: Feasibility in normal volunteers.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Noninvasive stiffness imaging techniques (elastography) can image myocardial tissue biomechanics in vivo. For cardiac MR elastography (MRE) techniques, the optimal vibration frequency for in vivo experiments is unknown. Furthermore, the accuracy of cardiac MRE has never been evaluated in a geometrically accurate phantom. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the necessary driving frequency to obtain accurate three-dimensional (3D) cardiac MRE stiffness estimates in a geometrically accurate diastolic cardiac phantom and to determine the optimal vibration frequency that can be introduced in healthy volunteers.

Methods

The 3D cardiac MRE was performed on eight healthy volunteers using 80 Hz, 100 Hz, 140 Hz, 180 Hz, and 220 Hz vibration frequencies. These frequencies were tested in a geometrically accurate diastolic heart phantom and compared with dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA).

Results

The 3D Cardiac MRE was shown to be feasible in volunteers at frequencies as high as 180 Hz. MRE and DMA agreed within 5% at frequencies greater than 180 Hz in the cardiac phantom. However, octahedral shear strain signal to noise ratios and myocardial coverage was shown to be highest at a frequency of 140 Hz across all subjects.

Conclusion

SUBMITTER: Arani A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4947569 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

In vivo, high-frequency three-dimensional cardiac MR elastography: Feasibility in normal volunteers.

Arani Arvin A Glaser Kevin L KL Arunachalam Shivaram P SP Rossman Phillip J PJ Lake David S DS Trzasko Joshua D JD Manduca Armando A McGee Kiaran P KP Ehman Richard L RL Araoz Philip A PA

Magnetic resonance in medicine 20160117 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>Noninvasive stiffness imaging techniques (elastography) can image myocardial tissue biomechanics in vivo. For cardiac MR elastography (MRE) techniques, the optimal vibration frequency for in vivo experiments is unknown. Furthermore, the accuracy of cardiac MRE has never been evaluated in a geometrically accurate phantom. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the necessary driving frequency to obtain accurate three-dimensional (3D) cardiac MRE stiffness estimates i ...[more]

PMID: 26778442

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Stiffness thresholds for liver MR elastography in children vary between studies and may differ from thresholds in adults. Normative liver stiffness data are needed to optimize diagnostic thresholds for children. Purpose To determine normal liver stiffness, and associated normal ranges for children, as measured with MR elastography across vendors and field strengths. Materials and Methods This was a prospective multicenter cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03235414). Volunteers aged 7-17.9 years without a known history of liver disease were recruited at four sites for a research MRI and blood draw between February 2018 and October 2019. MRI was performed on three vendor platforms and at two field strengths (1.5 T and 3.0 T). All MRI scans were centrally analyzed; stiffness, proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and R2* values were expressed as means of means. Mean and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for liver stiffness were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficient (r), two-sample t test, or analysis of variance was used to assess univariable associations. Results Seventy-one volunteers had complete data and no documented exclusion criterion (median age, 12 years; interquartile range [IQR], 10-15 years; 39 female participants). Median body mass index percentile was 54% (IQR, 32.5%-69.5%). Mean liver stiffness was 2.1 kPa (95% CI: 2.0, 2.2 kPa) with mean ± 1.96 kPa standard deviation of 1.5-2.8 kPa. Median liver PDFF was 2.0% (IQR, 1.7%-2.6%). There was no association between liver stiffness and any patient variable or MRI scanner factor. Conclusion Mean liver stiffness measured with MR elastography in children without liver disease was 2.1 kPa (similar to that in adults). The 95th percentile of normal liver stiffness was 2.8 kPa. Liver stiffness was independent of sex, age, or body mass index and did not vary with MRI scanner vendor or field strength. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Yin in this issue.

Project description:PurposeTo determine the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography in comparison to spleen length and dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging in association with esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis by using endoscopy as the reference standard.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study received institutional review board approval, and informed consent was waived. One hundred thirty-nine patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent liver DCE MR imaging, including MR elastography, were included. Hepatic stiffness (HS) and spleen stiffness (SS) values assessed with MR elastography, as well as spleen length, were correlated with the presence of esophageal varices and high-risk varices by using Spearman correlation analysis. The diagnostic performance of MR elastography was compared with that of DCE MR imaging and combined assessment of MR elastography and DCE MR imaging by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. MR elastography reproducibility was assessed prospectively, with informed consent, in another 15 patients by using intraclass correlation coefficients.ResultsThere were significant positive linear correlations between HS, SS, and spleen length and the grade of esophageal varices (r = 0.46, r = 0.48, and r = 0.36, respectively; all P < .0001). HS and SS values (>4.81 kPa and >7.60 kPa, respectively) showed better performance than did spleen length in the association with esophageal varices (P = .0306 and P = .0064, respectively). Diagnostic performance of HS and SS in predicting high-risk varices was comparable to that of DCE MR imaging (P = .1282 and P = .1371, respectively). When MR elastography and DCE MR imaging were combined, sensitivity improved significantly (P = .0004). MR elastography was highly reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9).ConclusionHS and SS are associated with esophageal varices and showed better performance than did spleen length in assessing the presence of esophageal varices. MR elastography is comparable to DCE MR imaging in predicting the presence of esophageal varices and high-risk varices, but, when assessed in combination, sensitivity is higher.

Project description:PurposeLung stiffness alters with many diseases; therefore, several MR elastography (MRE) studies were performed earlier to investigate the stiffness of the right lung during breathhold at residual volume and total lung capacity. The aims of this study were 1) to estimate shear stiffness of the lungs using MRE under free breathing and demonstrate the measurements' repeatability and reproducibility, and 2) to compare lung stiffness under free breathing to breathhold and as a function of age and gender.MethodsTwenty-five healthy volunteers were scanned on a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. Spin-echo dual-density spiral and a spin-echo EPI MRE sequences were used to measure shear stiffness of the lungs during free breathing and breathhold at midpoint of tidal volume, respectively. Concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the spin-echo dual-density spiral-derived shear stiffness. Repeated measures analyses of variances were used to investigate differences in shear stiffness between spin-echo dual-density spiral and spin-echo EPI, right and left lungs, males and females, and different age groups.ResultsFree-breathing MRE sequence was highly repeatable and reproducible (concordance correlation coefficient > 0.86 for both lungs). Lung stiffness was significantly lower in breathhold than in free breathing (P < .001), which can be attributed to potential stress relaxation of lung parenchyma or breathhold inconsistencies. However, there was no significant difference between different age groups (P = .08). The left lung showed slightly higher stiffness values than the right lung (P = .14). There is no significant difference in lung stiffness between genders.ConclusionThis study demonstrated the feasibility of free-breathing lung MRE with excellent repeatability and reproducibility. Stiffness changes with age and during the respiratory cycle. However, gender does not influence lungs stiffness.

Dataset Information

In vivo, high-frequency three-dimensional cardiac MR elastography: Feasibility in normal volunteers.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

In vivo, high-frequency three-dimensional cardiac MR elastography: Feasibility in normal volunteers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets