Dataset Information

Vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for female urethral stricture: A novel modification of surgical technique.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To present a novel modification of surgical technique to treat female urethral stricture (FUS) by a vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal urethroplasty. Recurrent FUS represents an uncommon, though difficult clinical scenario to manage definitively. A variety of surgical techniques have been described to date, yet a lack of consensus on the optimal procedure persists.

Materials and methods

We present a 51-year-old female with urethral stricture involving the entire urethra. Suspected etiology was iatrogenic from cystoscopy 17 years prior. Since then, the patient had undergone at least 25 formal urethral dilations and periods of self-dilation. In lithotomy position, the urethra was dilated to accommodate forceps, and ventral urethrotomy carried out sharply, exposing a bed of periurethral tissue. Buccal mucosa was harvested, and a ventral inlay technique facilitated by a nasal speculum, was used to place the graft from the proximal urethra/bladder neck to urethral meatus without a vaginal incision. Graft was sutured into place, and urethral Foley catheter inserted.

Results

The vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty was deemed successful as of last follow-up. Flexible cystoscopy demonstrated patency of the repair at 6 months. At 10 months of follow-up, the patient was voiding well, with no urinary incontinence. No further interventions have been required.

Conclusions

This case describes a novel modification of surgical technique for performing buccal mucosal urethroplasty for FUS. By avoiding incision of the vaginal mucosa, benefits may include reduced: morbidity, urinary incontinence, and wound complications including urethro-vaginal fistula.

SUBMITTER: Hoag N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4949696 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for female urethral stricture: A novel modification of surgical technique.

Hoag Nathan N Gani Johan J Chee Justin J

Investigative and clinical urology 20160705 4

<h4>Purpose</h4>To present a novel modification of surgical technique to treat female urethral stricture (FUS) by a vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal urethroplasty. Recurrent FUS represents an uncommon, though difficult clinical scenario to manage definitively. A variety of surgical techniques have been described to date, yet a lack of consensus on the optimal procedure persists.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We present a 51-year-old female with urethral stricture involving the entire urethr ...[more]

PMID: 27437540

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFemale urethral stricture (FUS) represents a sporadic condition. There is a lack of data and standardized guidelines on diagnostics and therapeutics. Several surgical techniques have been described for FUS urethroplasty, among which the flap-based or graft-based ones are most reported. Buccal mucosa graft (BMG) represents the gold standard for male urethroplasty, and this can theoretically be applied also to FUS treatment.ObjectiveTo describe and present preliminary results of a novel minimally invasive technique for buccal mucosa dorsal graft (mini-dorsal BMG) urethroplasty for the treatment of FUS.Design setting and participantsThis is a retrospective study on buccal mucosa dorsal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of FUS.Surgical procedureEvery patient was placed in lithotomic position. Two stiches were placed at 10 and 2 o'clock positions to facilitate the dorsal median urethrotomy. The margins of the incised dorsal urethra at the 12 o'clock position are then dissected from the periurethral tissue. This dissection results in an elliptical raw area between the edges of the urethra over the periurethral tissue. The harvested BMG was fixed with several quilting sutures, using 5-0 and 4-0 absorbable sutures, to cover the raw area. The margins of the graft were sutured to the edges of the incised urethra.MeasurementsA chart review was performed.Results and limitationsThirteen patients underwent the mini-dorsal-BMG technique. The median preoperative uroflow was 5.6 (3-13) ml/s, and the median postoperative value was 23.4 (14-58) ml/s.ConclusionsThe mini-dorsal-BMG technique for the treatment of FUS gives good results with low complication rates. Other series and long-term follow-up are necessary to confirm the reproducibility of this technique.Patient summaryWe present the technical aspects and the promising preliminary results of a novel surgical technique for the treatment of female urethral stricture by using the buccal mucosa to correct this invalidating disease.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the interplay of stricture recurrence, sexual function, and treatment satisfaction after substitution urethroplasty.MethodsObservational study of men undergoing 1-stage buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture between 2009 and 2016. Patients were dichotomized by self-reported treatment satisfaction. Sexual function was assessed by validated and non-validated patient-reported outcome measures. Functional recurrence was defined as symptomatic need of re-intervention. Bivariate analyses, Kaplan-Meier estimates, qualitative and quantitative analyses by uni- and multivariable regression were employed to evaluate the interplay of sexual function, functional recurrence, and treatment satisfaction.ResultsOf 534 men with bulbar (82%), penobulbar (11%), and penile strictures (7.3%), 451 (84%) were satisfied with the surgery. There were no differences in stricture location, previous treatment, graft length, or surgical technique between satisfied and unsatisfied patients (all p ≥ 0.2). Recurrence-free survival was 85% at a median follow-up of 33 mo and decreased significantly with each Likert item towards increasing dissatisfaction (p < 0.001). Dissatisfied patients more often reported postoperative loss of rigidity, tumescence, reduced ejaculatory volume, ejaculatory pain, and reduced penile length (all p ≤ 0.042). In 83 dissatisfied men, functional recurrence (28%) and oral morbidity (20%) were the main drivers of dissatisfaction in qualitative analysis. Multivariable analyses revealed functional recurrence and impaired postoperative ejaculatory function as independent predictors of treatment dissatisfaction (all p ≤ 0.029) after adjusting for confounders.ConclusionWe found an association of both functional success and sexual function with patient-reported treatment satisfaction after substitution urethroplasty. Such findings validate the clinical significance of defining the symptomatic need for re-intervention as an endpoint and underline the importance of further research evaluating sexual function before and after open urethral reconstruction.

Project description:ContextOral mucosa graft (OMG) and penile skin flap (PSF) are common substitutions in urethroplasty; however, the recommended substitution for anterior urethral strictures remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of OMG and PSF in anterior urethral strictures in terms of success rate and prevalence of postvoid dribbling based on current studies.Evidence acquisitionA systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022313879). All publications until March 1, 2022, were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases without any restriction. Studies that focused on patients with anterior urethral strictures undergoing single-stage augmentation urethroplasty with OMG and PSF, and reported comparable success rates between the two substitutions were included.Evidence synthesisThirteen studies involving a total of 1216 patients were included in the screening procedures, and 12 studies were eventually included in the meta-analysis. No significant difference in success rates was identified between OMG and PSF (odds ratio [OR]: 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-2.07, p = 0.08). No significant difference was observed in the comparison of success rates in penile urethral strictures (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.53-1.70, p = 0.86) and in the comparison of postvoid dribbling (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.31-1.11, p = 0.10). However, a subgroup analysis suggested that OMG had a higher success rate than PSF in studies with the top 50% sample size (six studies, OR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.055-2.668, p = 0.029) and the top 50% follow-up period (five studies, OR: 2.279, 95% CI: 1.193-4.352, p = 0.013).ConclusionsOMG provides the same success rate and postvoid dribbling as PSF. However, based on the existing evidence, OMG is more likely to perform better in a cohort with long-term follow-up and a relatively large sample size. More studies on the two substitutions are necessary to evaluate the factors of urethroplasty success rate, performance of substitutions in penile urethral strictures, and indicators of quality of life.Patient summaryIn this research, we compared the outcomes of oral mucosa graft (OMG) and penile skin flap for urethroplasty in anterior urethral stricture patients in 13 studies. We found that these were similar in terms of success rate and postvoid dribbling. However, OMG could probably provide a higher success rate when the studies had more patients or a longer follow-up period.

Project description:BackgroundBulbar urethral stricture is a common cause for urinary symptoms in men and its two main treatment options both have drawbacks with little evidence on their relative cost-effectiveness. Current guidelines on the management of recurrent bulbar urethral stricture have been predominantly based on expert opinion and panel consensus.ObjectiveTo assess the relative cost-effectiveness of open urethroplasty and endoscopic urethrotomy as treatment for recurrent urethral stricture in men.MethodsSet in the UK National Health Service with recruitment from 38 hospital sites, a randomised controlled trial of open urethroplasty and endoscopic urethrotomy with 6-monthly follow-up over 24 months was conducted. Two hundred and twenty-two men requiring operative treatment for recurrence of bulbar urethral stricture and having had at least one previous intervention for stricture were recruited. Effectiveness was measured by quality- adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from EQ-5D 5L. Cost-effectiveness was measured by the incremental cost per QALY gained over 24 months using a within trial analysis and a Markov model with a 10-year time horizon.ResultsIn the within trial, urethroplasty cost on average more than urethrotomy (cost difference: £2148 [95% CI 689, 3606]) and resulted in a similar number of QALYs on average (QALY difference: - 0.01 [95% CI - 0.17, 0.14)] over 24 months. The Markov model produced similar results. Sensitivity analyses using multiple imputation, suggested that the results were robust, despite observed missing data.ConclusionsBased on current practice and evidence, urethrotomy is a cost-effective treatment compared with urethroplasty.KeypointsUrethrotomy and urethroplasty both led to symptom improvement for men with bulbar urethral stricture-a common cause for urinary symptoms in men; Urethroplasty appeared unlikely to offer good value for money compared to urethrotomy based on current evidence.Trial registrationISRCTN: 98009168 (date: 29 November 2012) and it is also in the UK NIHR Portfolio (reference 13507). Trial protocol: The latest version (1.8) of the full protocol is available at: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta/105723/ #/ and a published version is also available: Stephenson R, Carnell S, Johnson N, Brown R, Wilkinson J, Mundy A, et al. Open urethroplasty versus endoscopic urethrotomy-clarifying the management of men with recurrent urethral stricture (the OPEN trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2015;16:600. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1120-4. Trial main clinical results publication: Goulao B, Carnell S, Shen J, MacLennan G, Norrie J, Cook J, et al. Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial), European Urology, Volume 78, Issue 4, 2020, Pages 572-580.

Dataset Information

Vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for female urethral stricture: A novel modification of surgical technique.

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Vaginal-sparing ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for female urethral stricture: A novel modification of surgical technique.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets