Dataset Information

An Open-Label Investigation of the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Oral Cysteamine in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Cysteamine is licensed for use in nephropathic cystinosis but preclinical data suggest a role in managing cystic fibrosis (CF). This study aimed to determine whether oral cysteamine is absorbed in adult CF patients and enters the bronchial secretions. Tolerability outcomes were also explored. METHODS:Patients ?18 years of age, weighing >50 kg with stable CF lung disease were commenced on oral cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon(®)) 450 mg once daily, increased weekly to 450 mg four times daily. Serial plasma cysteamine concentrations were measured for 24 h after the first dose. Participants were reviewed every week for 6 weeks, except at 4 weeks. Plasma cysteamine concentrations were measured 8 h after dosing when reviewed at 1, 2 and 3 weeks and 6 h after dosing when reviewed at 5 weeks. Sputum cysteamine concentration was also quantified at the 5-week assessment. RESULTS:Seven of the ten participants reported adverse reactions typical of cysteamine, two participants discontinued intervention. Following the first 450-mg dose, mean (SD) maximum concentration (C max) was 2.86 (1.96) mg/l, the time corresponding to C max (T max) was 1.2 (0.7) h, the half-life (t ½) was 3.7 (1.7) h, clearance (CL/F) 89.9 (30.5) L/h and volume of distribution (V d/F) 427 (129) L. Cysteamine appeared to accumulate in sputum with a median (interquartile range) sputum:plasma cysteamine concentration ratio of 4.2 (0.98-8.84). CONCLUSION:Oral cysteamine is absorbed and enters the bronchial secretions in patients with CF. Although adverse reactions were common, the majority of patients continued with cysteamine. Further trials are required to establish the risk benefit ratio of cysteamine therapy in CF.

SUBMITTER: Devereux G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4951511 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

An Open-Label Investigation of the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Oral Cysteamine in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

Devereux Graham G Steele Sandra S Griffiths Kairen K Devlin Edward E Fraser-Pitt Douglas D Cotton Seonaidh S Norrie John J Chrystyn Henry H O'Neil Deborah D

Clinical drug investigation 20160801 8

<h4>Background and objective</h4>Cysteamine is licensed for use in nephropathic cystinosis but preclinical data suggest a role in managing cystic fibrosis (CF). This study aimed to determine whether oral cysteamine is absorbed in adult CF patients and enters the bronchial secretions. Tolerability outcomes were also explored.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients ≥18 years of age, weighing >50 kg with stable CF lung disease were commenced on oral cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon(®)) 450 mg once daily, increased ...[more]

PMID: 27153825

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEmerging data suggests a possible role for cysteamine as an adjunct treatment for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF) that continue to be a major clinical challenge. There are no studies investigating the use of cysteamine in pulmonary exacerbations of CF. This exploratory randomized clinical trial was conducted to answer the question: In future pivotal trials of cysteamine as an adjunct treatment in pulmonary exacerbations of CF, which candidate cysteamine dosing regimens should be tested and which are the most appropriate, clinically meaningful outcome measures to employ as endpoints?Methods and findingsMulticentre double-blind randomized clinical trial. Adults experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation of CF being treated with standard care that included aminoglycoside therapy were randomized equally to a concomitant 14-day course of placebo, or one of 5 dosing regimens of cysteamine. Outcomes were recorded on days 0, 7, 14 and 21 and included sputum bacterial load and the patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score (CRISS), the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R); FEV1, blood leukocyte count, and inflammatory markers. Eighty nine participants in fifteen US and EU centres were randomized, 78 completed the 14-day treatment period. Cysteamine had no significant effect on sputum bacterial load, however technical difficulties limited interpretation. The most consistent findings were for cysteamine 450mg twice daily that had effects additional to that observed with placebo, with improved symptoms, CRISS additional 9.85 points (95% CI 0.02, 19.7) p = 0.05, reduced blood leukocyte count by 2.46x109 /l (95% CI 0.11, 4.80), p = 0.041 and reduced CRP by geometric mean 2.57 nmol/l (95% CI 0.15, 0.99), p = 0.049.ConclusionIn this exploratory study cysteamine appeared to be safe and well-tolerated. Future pivotal trials investigating the utility of cysteamine in pulmonary exacerbations of CF need to include the cysteamine 450mg doses and CRISS and blood leukocyte count as outcome measures.Clinical trial registrationNCT03000348; www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Project description:BackgroundOral drug formulations have several advantages compared to intravenous formulation. Apart from patient convenience and favorable pharmacoeconomics, they offer the possibility of frequent drug administration at home. In this study, we present a new oral irinotecan formulation designed as an enteric coated immediate release tablet which in pre-clinical studies has shown good exposure with low variability.MethodsA phase I, dose escalating study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of an oral irinotecan formulation and to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Each treatment cycle was once-daily irinotecan for 14 days followed by 1 week rest.Results25 patients were included across four cohorts; 3 patients were included in cohort 1 (20 mg/m2), 7 patients were included in cohort 2 (30 mg/m2), 3 patients were included in cohort 3 (25 mg/m2) and 12 patients were included in cohort 4 (21 mg/m2). Median age was 67 years, 52% were performance status (PS) 0 while 48% were PS 1. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-6). MTD was established at 21 mg/m2. No responses were observed. Nine patients (36%) had stable disease (SD), lasting median 19 weeks (range 7-45 weeks). Among these five patients had previously received irinotecan. No grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were reported. Totally six patients experienced grade 1/2 anemia, three patients had grade 1/2 leucopenia and 1 patient had grade 1 thrombocytopenia. Most common non-hematological grade 1 and 2 adverse events were nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting and cholinergic syndrome. Grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, no grade 4 events were reported. PK data showed consistent daily exposures during treatment at days 1 and 14 and no drug accumulation. SN-38 interpatient variability was in the same range as after infusion.ConclusionsOral irinotecan was generally well tolerated; side effects were manageable and similar in type to those observed with intravenous irinotecan. Hematological toxicities were few and only grade 1/2. In this heavily pre-treated patient population, oral irinotecan demonstrated activity even among patients previously treated with irinotecan.

Project description:As methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) becomes more prevalent, vancomycin is becoming increasingly used as a prophylaxis against surgical-site infections for cardiothoracic surgeries. However, vancomycin administration can be challenging, and the pharmacokinetics of alternative antibiotics in this setting are poorly understood. The primary objective of this investigation was to describe the pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We enrolled 15 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Each subject was administered a single open-label dose of daptomycin (8 mg/kg of body weight) for surgical prophylaxis. Fourteen daptomycin plasma samples were collected. Safety outcomes between subjects who received daptomycin and 15 control subjects who received the standard-of-care antibiotic were compared. The mean maximal concentration of daptomycin (C(max)) was 84.4 ± 27.1 ?g/ml; the mean daptomycin concentration during the cardiopulmonary bypass procedure was 33.2 ± 11.4 ?g/ml and was 30.9 ± 12.7 ?g/ml at sternum closure. Mean daptomycin concentrations at 12, 18, 24, and 48 h were 22.7 ± 9.7, 16.2 ± 8.2, 12.0 ± 4.7, and 3.5 ± 2.3 ?g/ml, respectively. Mean daptomycin concentrations were consistently above the MIC at which 90% of the tested isolates are inhibited (MIC??) for S. aureus and S. epidermidis during the cardiopulmonary bypass procedure. Daptomycin was not associated with surgical-site infections or differences in adverse events compared to findings for control subjects. We found that a single dose of daptomycin at 8 mg/kg was well tolerated and achieved adequate plasma concentrations against common pathogens associated with surgical-site infections after cardiothoracic surgery. Daptomycin may be considered an alternative surgical prophylaxis antibiotic for patients undergoing cardiothoracic bypass surgery who are unable to receive vancomycin.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) as 15-min intravenous (IV) infusion and bolus (≤2-min injection).MethodsEP0065 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03405714) was a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label trial in patients ≥1 month to <16 years of age with epilepsy. Patients received up to 5 mg/kg/day BRV (not exceeding 200 mg/day). Enrollment was sequential by descending age, depending on safety review. Outcomes included BRV plasma concentrations before and after IV administration, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and discontinuations due to TEAEs.ResultsFifty patients were enrolled, received BRV, and completed the trial. Twenty-six patients (52.0%) received 15-min infusions and 24 (48.0%) received bolus injections. Most patients (80.0%) received one IV dose. In the 15-min infusion group, geometric mean (GeoMean) BRV concentrations 15 (±2) min (n = 21) and 3 h (±15 min) (n = 21) post dose were 1903.0 ng/mL (geometric coefficient of variation [GeoCV]: 60.7%) and 1130.3 ng/mL (58.8%), respectively. In the bolus group, GeoMean BRV concentrations 15 (±2) min (n = 19) and 3 h (±15 min) (n = 21) post dose were 1704.8 ng/mL (GeoCV: 74.5%) and 1383.9 ng/mL (85.0%), respectively. Overall, 14 patients (28.0%) had TEAEs (15-min infusion: 8 [30.8%]; bolus: 6 [25.0%]), most commonly (≥5% of patients) somnolence (3 [6.0%]). Ten patients (20.0%) had drug-related TEAEs (15-min infusion: 6 [23.1%]; bolus: 4 [16.7%]). No patients discontinued due to TEAEs, and no deaths occurred.SignificanceIV BRV (up to 200 mg/day) was well tolerated in patients ≥1 month to <16 years of age, regardless of whether BRV was administered as 15-min infusion or bolus. No unexpected safety or pharmacokinetic differences were observed between patients receiving 15-min infusions or bolus, and plasma concentrations were in the expected range. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of oral BRV, with no new safety concerns identified.

Project description:BackgroundTreatment failure of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease occurs in about 30% of people with cystic fibrosis (CF) and may be a result of abnormal drug concentrations.MethodsProspective, cross-over, single-dose PK study of 20 pancreatic insufficient individuals with CF and 10 healthy controls (HC). CF subjects received simultaneous doses of oral azithromycin, ethambutol, and rifampin in the fasting state and with food and pancreatic enzymes, separated by two weeks. HC received fasting doses only. A non-compartmental model was used to estimate PK parameters of drugs and metabolites.ResultsAzithromycin maximum concentration (Cmax ) was higher and rifampin Cmax was lower in fasting CF subjects compared to HC, while other PK measures, including those for ethambutol, were similar. Addition of food and enzymes did not improve the Cmax of the antimycobacterial drugs. Nineteen of 20 CF subjects had one or more abnormal Cmax z-scores in either the fasting or fed state (or both), when compared to HC.ConclusionPK profiles of azithromycin and ethambutol were similar between CF and HC, except azithromycin Cmax was slightly higher in people with CF after a single dose. Rifampin PK parameters were altered in persons with CF. Addition of food and enzymes in CF subjects did not improve PK parameters. Standard dosing guidelines should be used as a starting point for people with CF initiating MAC therapy and therapeutic drug monitoring should be routinely performed to prevent the possibility of treatment failure due to abnormal drug concentrations.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02372383 Prior abstract publication: 1. Martiniano S, Wagner B, Brennan L, Wempe M, Anderson P, Nick J, Sagel S. Pharmacokinetics of oral MAC antibiotics in cystic fibrosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med A4842-A4842, 2017. 2. Martiniano SL, Wagner BD, Brennan L, Wempe MF, Anderson PL, Nick JA, Sagel SD. Pharmacokinetics of oral MAC antibiotics in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 16: S52-53, 2017.

Project description:BackgroundZibotentan (ZD4054) is a specific endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonist being investigated for the treatment of prostate cancer. As zibotentan is eliminated by renal and metabolic routes, clearance may be reduced in patients with hepatic or renal impairment, leading to greater drug exposure.MethodsOpen-label studies investigated the PK and tolerability of zibotentan in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment, compared with those with normal organ function. In the hepatic and renal studies, respectively, subjects were divided into categories using Child-Pugh classification or 24-hour urine creatinine clearance (mild, moderate, or severe impairment and normal function). Each subject received a single oral dose of zibotentan 10 mg and PK sampling was undertaken. Within the hepatic study, AUC and Cmax were expressed as the ratio of geometric means and 90% CI for each impairment group compared with the normal function group. The possibility that hepatic impairment had a clinically relevant effect on exposure was considered if the upper 90% CI for the ratio exceeded 2. In the renal study, AUC, Cmax and t1/2 were analyzed using linear regression fitting effects for creatinine clearance and age.ResultsIn the hepatic and renal studies respectively, 32 subjects (eight per group) and 48 subjects received treatment (n = 18 normal, n = 12 mild, n = 9 moderate, n = 9 severe). Zibotentan Cmax was not significantly affected by hepatic or renal impairment. Compared with the normal function group, zibotentan AUC was 40% (1.40; 90% CI 0.91-2.17), 45% (1.45; 90% CI 0.94-2.24) and 190% (2.90; 90% CI 1.88-4.49) higher in subjects with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, and 66% (1.66; 90% CI 1.38-1.99), 89% (1.89; 90% CI 1.50-2.39) and 117% (2.17; 90% CI 1.64-2.86) higher in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. In both studies mean t1/2 increased and zibotentan clearance decreased with the degree of impairment. Headache was the most common AE in all groups.ConclusionsZibotentan absorption was unchanged, however, exposure was higher in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment due to slower clearance. This increased exposure did not result in differences in the range or severity of AEs observed.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00672581 and AstraZeneca study number D4320C00016 (renal trial; conducted in Germany).

Dataset Information

An Open-Label Investigation of the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Oral Cysteamine in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

Publications

An Open-Label Investigation of the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Oral Cysteamine in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets