Dataset Information

In permanent atrial fibrillation, PDE3 reduces force responses to 5-HT, but PDE3 and PDE4 do not cause the blunting of atrial arrhythmias.

ABSTRACT:

Background and purpose

5-HT increases force and L-type Ca(2) (+) current (ICa,L ) and causes arrhythmias through 5-HT4 receptors in human atrium. In permanent atrial fibrillation (peAF), atrial force responses to 5-HT are blunted, arrhythmias abolished but ICa,L responses only moderately attenuated. We investigated whether, in peAF, this could be due to an increased function of PDE3 and/or PDE4, using the inhibitors cilostamide (300 nM) and rolipram (1 μM) respectively.

Experimental approach

Contractile force, arrhythmic contractions and ICa,L were assessed in right atrial trabeculae and myocytes, obtained from patients with sinus rhythm (SR), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) and peAF.

Key results

Maximum force responses to 5-HT were reduced to 15% in peAF, but not in pAF. Cilostamide, but not rolipram, increased both the blunted force responses to 5-HT in peAF and the inotropic potency of 5-HT fourfold to sevenfold in trabeculae of patients with SR, pAF and peAF. Lusitropic responses to 5-HT were not decreased in peAF. Responses of ICa,L to 5-HT did not differ and were unaffected by cilostamide or rolipram in myocytes from patients with SR or peAF. Concurrent cilostamide and rolipram increased 5-HT's propensity to elicit arrhythmias in trabeculae from patients with SR, but not with peAF.

Conclusions and implications

PDE3, but not PDE4, reduced inotropic responses to 5-HT in peAF, independently of lusitropy and ICa,L , but PDE3 activity was the same as that in patients with SR and pAF. Atrial remodelling in peAF abolished the facilitation of 5-HT to induce arrhythmias by inhibition of PDE3 plus PDE4.

SUBMITTER: Berk E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4959958 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) and other arrhythmias are prevalent and often encountered by general practitioners (GPs). In response to the growing prevalence and to assist practitioners in the diagnosis and management of AF, the Cardiac Society of Australia & New Zealand and Heart Foundation of Australia published the first Australian AF Guidelines in 2018. We aimed to examine (a) the proportion of GPs who performed any form of AF screening and identify the methods they applied, (b) GPs' awareness of the AF Guidelines and approaches to arrhythmia screening, (c) the roles of conventional 12-lead ECG and mobile health devices, and (d) GPs' confidence in ECG interpretation and need for training.MethodsA cross-sectional online survey titled "GPs Screen their patients for Atrial Fibrillation and othEr aRrhythmia (GPSAFER)" was conducted from October 2018 to March 2019. The participants were recruited via various GP networks across Australia. Ethics approval was granted by The University of Sydney.ResultsA total of 463 surveys were completed. Many GPs (394/463, 85.1%, 95% CI 81.5-88.2%) performed some forms of AF screening and applied at least one AF screening method, most frequently pulse palpation (389/463, 84.0%). Some (299/463, 64.6%) GPs considered assessing their patients for other arrhythmias (237/299, 79.3% for complete heart block and 236/299, 78.9% for long-QT). Most GPs (424/463, 91.6%) were not using mobile ECG devices in their practice but some (147/463, 31.7%) were contemplating it. One third (175/463, 37.8%) of GPs were aware of the Australian AF Guidelines; those aware were more likely to perform AF screening (98.9% vs 76.7%, p < 0.001). Factors significantly and positively associated with AF screening were "awareness of the AF Guidelines" (p < 0.001), "number of years working in general practice" (p < 0.001), and "confidence in ECG interpretation of AF" (p = 0.003). Most GPs reported that they were very or extremely confident in interpreting AF (381/463, 82.3%) and complete heart block (266/463, 57.5%). Many GPs (349/463, 75.4%) would like to receive online ECG interpretation training.ConclusionsAssessment of arrhythmias is common in general practice and GPs are open to further training in ECG interpretation and using mobile ECG devices to aid their clinical practice. Increasing awareness of AF Guidelines and improving confidence in ECG interpretation may increase AF screening.

Project description:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice with a large socioeconomic impact due to its associated morbidity, mortality, reduction in quality of life and health care costs. Currently, antiarrhythmic drug therapy is the first line of treatment for most symptomatic AF patients, despite its limited efficacy, the risk of inducing potentially life-threating ventricular tachyarrhythmias as well as other side effects. Alternative, in-hospital treatment modalities consisting of electrical cardioversion and invasive catheter ablation improve patients' symptoms, but often have to be repeated and are still associated with serious complications and only suitable for specific subgroups of AF patients. The development and progression of AF generally results from the interplay of multiple disease pathways and is accompanied by structural and functional (e.g., electrical) tissue remodeling. Rational development of novel treatment modalities for AF, with its many different etiologies, requires a comprehensive insight into the complex pathophysiological mechanisms. Monolayers of atrial cells represent a simplified surrogate of atrial tissue well-suited to investigate atrial arrhythmia mechanisms, since they can easily be used in a standardized, systematic and controllable manner to study the role of specific pathways and processes in the genesis, perpetuation and termination of atrial arrhythmias. In this review, we provide an overview of the currently available two- and three-dimensional multicellular in vitro systems for investigating the initiation, maintenance and termination of atrial arrhythmias and AF. This encompasses cultures of primary (animal-derived) atrial cardiomyocytes (CMs), pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial-like CMs and (conditionally) immortalized atrial CMs. The strengths and weaknesses of each of these model systems for studying atrial arrhythmias will be discussed as well as their implications for future studies.