Dataset Information

Pollinators show flower colour preferences but flowers with similar colours do not attract similar pollinators.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aims

Colour is one of the main floral traits used by pollinators to locate flowers. Although pollinators show innate colour preferences, the view that the colour of a flower may be considered an important predictor of its main pollinators is highly controversial because flower choice is highly context-dependent, and initial innate preferences may be overridden by subsequent associative learning. Our objective is to establish whether there is a relationship between flower colour and pollinator composition in natural communities.

Methods

We measured the flower reflectance spectrum and pollinator composition in four plant communities (85 plant species represented by 109 populations, and 32 305 plant-pollinator interactions in total). Pollinators were divided into six taxonomic groups: bees, ants, wasps, coleopterans, dipterans and lepidopterans.

Key results

We found consistent associations between pollinator groups and certain colours. These associations matched innate preferences experimentally established for several pollinators and predictions of the pollination syndrome theory. However, flowers with similar colours did not attract similar pollinator assemblages.

Conclusions

The explanation for this paradoxical result is that most flower species are pollination generalists. We conclude that although pollinator colour preferences seem to condition plant-pollinator interactions, the selective force behind these preferences has not been strong enough to mediate the appearance and maintenance of tight colour-based plant-pollinator associations.

SUBMITTER: Reverte S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4970366 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pollinators show flower colour preferences but flowers with similar colours do not attract similar pollinators.

Reverté Sara S Retana Javier J Gómez José M JM Bosch Jordi J

Annals of botany 20160620 2

<h4>Background and aims</h4>Colour is one of the main floral traits used by pollinators to locate flowers. Although pollinators show innate colour preferences, the view that the colour of a flower may be considered an important predictor of its main pollinators is highly controversial because flower choice is highly context-dependent, and initial innate preferences may be overridden by subsequent associative learning. Our objective is to establish whether there is a relationship between flower c ...[more]

PMID: 27325897

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimsAs most plants rely on pollination for persistence in communities, pollination interactions should be important determinants of plant community assembly. Here, trait and phylogenetic null modelling approaches were combined with pollinator interaction networks to elucidate the processes structuring flower colour assembly patterns in Asteraceae communities in Namaqualand, South Africa.MethodsPlant species were assigned to flower colour pattern categories (CPCs) that incorporate the complexity of the bulls-eye colour pattern, using pollinator vision models. Null models were used to assess whether daisy communities exhibit clustering (driven by filtering, facilitation or convergence) or overdispersion (driven by competitive exclusion or character displacement) of CPCs. Next, flower visitor networks were constructed for communities with non-random CPC assembly to confirm the functional role of pollinators in determining floral trait assembly.Key resultsPlant species are unevenly distributed across CPCs, the majority of which are not phylogenetically conserved, suggesting that certain CPCs have a selective advantage. Clustering of CPCs in communities is more frequent than overdispersion, and this does not reflect non-random phylogenetic assembly. In most communities at least one CPC is overrepresented relative to null assemblages. Interaction networks show that each community has a single dominant pollinator that strongly interacts with the overrepresented CPC, suggesting a role for pollinator preferences in driving clustered assembly of CPCs within daisy communities.ConclusionThis novel approach, which demonstrates non-random assembly of complex flower colour patterns and corroborates their functional association with particular pollinators, provides strong evidence that pollinators influence plant community assembly. Results suggest that in some community contexts the benefits of pollinator sharing outweigh the costs of heterospecific pollen transfer, generating clustered assembly. They also challenge the perception of generalized pollination in daisies, suggesting instead that complex daisy colour patterns represent a pollination syndrome trait linked to specific fly pollinators.

Project description:The striking variation in flower color across and within Angiosperm species is often attributed to divergent selection resulting from geographic mosaics of pollinators with different color preferences. Despite the importance of pollinator mosaics in driving floral divergence, the distributions of pollinators and their color preferences are seldom quantified. The extensive mass-flowering displays of annual daisy species in Namaqualand, South Africa, are characterized by striking color convergence within communities, but also color turnover within species and genera across large geographic scales. We aimed to determine whether shifts between orange and white-flowered daisy communities are driven by the innate color preferences of different pollinators or by soil color, which can potentially affect the detectability of different colored flowers. Different bee-fly pollinators dominated in both community types so that largely non-overlapping pollinator distributions were strongly associated with different flower colors. Visual modeling demonstrated that orange and white-flowered species are distinguishable in fly vision, and choice experiments demonstrated strongly divergent color preferences. We found that the dominant pollinator in orange communities has a strong spontaneous preference for orange flowers, which was not altered by conditioning. Similarly, the dominant pollinator in white communities exhibited an innate preference for white flowers. Although detectability of white flowers varied across soil types, background contrast did not alter color preferences. These findings demonstrate that landscape-level flower color turnover across Namaqua daisy communities is likely shaped by a strong qualitative geographic mosaic of bee-fly pollinators with divergent color preferences. This is an unexpected result given the classically generalist pollination phenotype of daisies. However, because of the dominance of single fly pollinator species within communities, and the virtual absence of bees as pollinators, we suggest that Namaqua daisies function as pollination specialists despite their generalist phenotypes, thus facilitating differentiation of flower color by pollinator shifts across the fly pollinator mosaic.

Dataset Information

Pollinators show flower colour preferences but flowers with similar colours do not attract similar pollinators.

Background and aims

Methods

Key results

Conclusions

Publications

Pollinators show flower colour preferences but flowers with similar colours do not attract similar pollinators.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets