Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
Risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) has been suggested to be associated with polymorphisms of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), while the results were controversial. We aimed to systematically assess the association between PPAR polymorphisms and CHD risk.Methods
A case-control study with 446 subjects was conducted to evaluate the association between CHD risk and C161T polymorphism, which was of our special interest as this polymorphism showed different effects on risks of CHD and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Meta-analyses were conducted to assess all PPAR polymorphisms. Either a fixed- or a random-effects model was adopted to estimate overall odds ratios (ORs).Results
In the case-control study, T allele carriers of C161T polymorphism were not significantly associated with CHD risk (Odds ratio (OR)?=?0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.15, P?=?0.19), while T allele carriers showed higher risk of ACS (OR?=?1.63, 95% CI 1.00-2.65, P?=?0.048). The meta-analysis indicated that compared with CC homozygous, T allele carriers had lower CHD risk (OR?=?0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.82, P?ConclusionsThe results suggested that PPAR-alpha intron 7G/C and L162V, PPAR-delta +294T/C and PPAR-gamma C161T polymorphisms could affect CHD susceptibility, and C161T polymorphism might have different effects on CHD and ACS.
SUBMITTER: Qian Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4985297 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Qian Yufeng Y Li Peiwei P Zhang Jinjie J Shi Yu Y Chen Kun K Yang Jun J Wu Yihua Y Ye Xianhua X
Medicine 20160801 32
<h4>Objectives</h4>Risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) has been suggested to be associated with polymorphisms of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), while the results were controversial. We aimed to systematically assess the association between PPAR polymorphisms and CHD risk.<h4>Methods</h4>A case-control study with 446 subjects was conducted to evaluate the association between CHD risk and C161T polymorphism, which was of our special interest as this polymorphism showed diffe ...[more]