Dataset Information

Targeted Exome Sequencing Outcome Variations of Colorectal Tumors within and across Two Sequencing Platforms.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND AIM:Next generation sequencing (NGS) has quickly the tool of choice for genome and exome data generation. The multitude of sequencing platforms as well as the variabilities within each platform need to be assessed. In this paper we used two platforms (ION TORRENT AND ILLUMINA) to assess single nucleotides variants in colorectal cancer (CRC) specimens. METHODS:CRC specimens (n = 13) collected from 6 CRC (cancer and matched normal) patients were used to establish the mutational profile using ION TORRENT AND ILLUMINA sequencing platforms. We analyzed a set of samples from Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded and FF (FF) samples on both platforms to assess the effect of sample nature (FFPE vs. FF) on sequencing outcome and to evaluate the similarity/differences of SNVs across the two platforms. In addition, duplicates of FF samples were sequenced on each platform to assess variability within platform. RESULTS:The comparison of FF replicates to each other gave a concordance of 77% (± 15.3%) in Ion Torrent and 70% (± 3.7%) in Illumina. FFPE vs. FF replicates gave a concordance of 40% (± 32%) in Ion Torrent and 49% (± 19%) in Illumina. For the cross platform concordance were FFPE compared to FF (Average of 75% (± 9.8%) for FFPE samples and 67% (± 32%) for FF and 70% (± 26.8%) overall average). CONCLUSION:Our data show a significant variability within and across platforms. Also the number of detected variants depend on the nature of the specimen; FF vs. FFPE. Validation of NGS discovered mutations is a must to rule-out false positive mutants. This validation might either be performed through a second NGS platform or through Sanger sequencing.

SUBMITTER: Ashktorab H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4989921 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Targeted Exome Sequencing Outcome Variations of Colorectal Tumors within and across Two Sequencing Platforms.

Ashktorab Hassan H Azimi Hamed H Nickerson Michael L ML Bass Sara S Varma Sudhir S Brim Hassan H

Next generation, sequencing & applications 20160314 1

<h4>Background and aim</h4>Next generation sequencing (NGS) has quickly the tool of choice for genome and exome data generation. The multitude of sequencing platforms as well as the variabilities within each platform need to be assessed. In this paper we used two platforms (ION TORRENT AND ILLUMINA) to assess single nucleotides variants in colorectal cancer (CRC) specimens.<h4>Methods</h4>CRC specimens (n = 13) collected from 6 CRC (cancer and matched normal) patients were used to establish the ...[more]

PMID: 27547838

Similar Datasets

Project description:To promote the clinical application of next-generation sequencing, it is important to obtain accurate and consistent variants of target genomic regions at low cost. Ion Proton, the latest updated semiconductor-based sequencing instrument from Life Technologies, is designed to provide investigators with an inexpensive platform for human whole exome sequencing that achieves a rapid turnaround time. However, few studies have comprehensively compared and evaluated the accuracy of variant calling between Ion Proton and Illumina sequencing platforms such as HiSeq 2000, which is the most popular sequencing platform for the human genome. The Ion Proton sequencer combined with the Ion TargetSeq Exome Enrichment Kit together make up TargetSeq-Proton, whereas SureSelect-Hiseq is based on the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v4 Kit and the HiSeq 2000 sequencer.Here, we sequenced exonic DNA from four human blood samples using both TargetSeq-Proton and SureSelect-HiSeq. We then called variants in the exonic regions that overlapped between the two exome capture kits (33.6 Mb). The rates of shared variant loci called by two sequencing platforms were from 68.0 to 75.3% in four samples, whereas the concordance of co-detected variant loci reached 99%. Sanger sequencing validation revealed that the validated rate of concordant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (91.5%) was higher than the SNPs specific to TargetSeq-Proton (60.0%) or specific to SureSelect-HiSeq (88.3%). With regard to 1-bp small insertions and deletions (InDels), the Sanger sequencing validated rates of concordant variants (100.0%) and SureSelect-HiSeq-specific (89.6%) were higher than those of TargetSeq-Proton-specific (15.8%).In the sequencing of exonic regions, a combination of using of two sequencing strategies (SureSelect-HiSeq and TargetSeq-Proton) increased the variant calling specificity for concordant variant loci and the sensitivity for variant loci called by any one platform. However, for the sequencing of platform-specific variants, the accuracy of variant calling by HiSeq 2000 was higher than that of Ion Proton, specifically for the InDel detection. Moreover, the variant calling software also influences the detection of SNPs and, specifically, InDels in Ion Proton exome sequencing.

Dataset Information

Targeted Exome Sequencing Outcome Variations of Colorectal Tumors within and across Two Sequencing Platforms.

Publications

Targeted Exome Sequencing Outcome Variations of Colorectal Tumors within and across Two Sequencing Platforms.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure