Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparative effectiveness of levetiracetam, valproate and carbamazepine among elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: subgroup analysis of the randomized, unblinded KOMET study.


ABSTRACT: Few clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as initial monotherapy for elderly patients.This post-hoc subgroup analysis of data from an unblinded, randomized, 52-week superiority study (KOMET) compared the effectiveness of levetiracetam (LEV) with extended-release sodium valproate (VPA-ER) and controlled-release carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) as monotherapy in patients aged???60 years with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The physician chose VPA or CBZ as preferred standard treatment; patients were randomized to standard AEDs or LEV. The primary endpoint was time to treatment withdrawal. Results are exploratory, since KOMET was not powered for a subgroup analysis by age.Patients (n?=?308) were randomized to LEV (n?=?48) or VPA-ER (n?=?53) in the VPE-ER stratum or to LEV (n?=?104) or CBZ-CR (n?=?103) in the CBZ-CR stratum. Mean age was 69.6 years, range 60.2-89.9 years (intention-to-treat population n?=?307). Time to treatment withdrawal hazard ratio [HR] (95 % confidence interval [CI]) for LEV vs. standard AEDs was 0.44 (0.28-0.67); LEV vs.0.46 (0.16-1.33); LEV vs.0.45 (0.28-0.72). Twelve-month withdrawal rates were: LEV vs. standard AEDs, 20.4 vs. 38.7 %; LEV vs. VPA-ER, 10.4 vs. 23.1 %; LEV vs. CBZ-CR, 25.0 vs. 46.6 %. Time to first seizure was similar between LEV and standard AEDs (HR: 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.63-1.35), LEV and VPA-ER (0.77, 0.38-1.56), and LEV and CBZ-CR (1.02, 0.64-1.63). Adverse events were reported by 76.2, 67.3, and 82.5 % of patients for LEV, VPA-ER, and CBZ-CR, respectively. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were 11.3, 10.2, and 35.0 % for LEV, VPA-ER, and CBZ-CR, respectively.Time to treatment withdrawal was longer with LEV compared with standard AEDs. This finding was driven primarly by the result in the CBZ-CR stratum, which in turn was likely due to the more favorable tolerability profile of LEV. Results of this post-hoc analysis suggest that LEV may be a suitable option for initial monotherapy for patients aged???60 years with newly diagnosed epilepsy.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00175903 ; September 9, 2005.

SUBMITTER: Pohlmann-Eden B 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4995751 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparative effectiveness of levetiracetam, valproate and carbamazepine among elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: subgroup analysis of the randomized, unblinded KOMET study.

Pohlmann-Eden Bernd B   Marson Anthony G AG   Noack-Rink Matthias M   Ramirez Francisco F   Tofighy Azita A   Werhahn Konrad J KJ   Wild Imane I   Trinka Eugen E  

BMC neurology 20160823 1


<h4>Background</h4>Few clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as initial monotherapy for elderly patients.<h4>Methods</h4>This post-hoc subgroup analysis of data from an unblinded, randomized, 52-week superiority study (KOMET) compared the effectiveness of levetiracetam (LEV) with extended-release sodium valproate (VPA-ER) and controlled-release carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) as monotherapy in patients aged ≥ 60 years with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4189633 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7293688 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6852050 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6988520 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5941785 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5875334 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8817659 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5412710 | biostudies-literature