Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Ceftazidime-avibactam Versus Doripenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis: RECAPTURE, a Phase 3 Randomized Trial Program.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The global emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae highlights the urgent need to reduce carbapenem dependence. The phase 3 RECAPTURE program compared the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam and doripenem in patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis. METHODS:Hospitalized adults with suspected or microbiologically confirmed cUTI/acute pyelonephritis were randomized 1:1 to ceftazidime-avibactam 2000 mg/500 mg every 8 hours or doripenem 500 mg every 8 hours (doses adjusted for renal function), with possible oral antibiotic switch after ?5 days (total treatment duration up to 10 days or 14 days for patients with bacteremia). RESULTS:Of 1033 randomized patients, 393 and 417 treated with ceftazidime-avibactam and doripenem, respectively, were eligible for the primary efficacy analyses; 19.6% had ceftazidime-nonsusceptible baseline pathogens. Noninferiority of ceftazidime-avibactam vs doripenem was demonstrated for the US Food and Drug Administration co-primary endpoints of (1) patient-reported symptomatic resolution at day 5: 276 of 393 (70.2%) vs 276 of 417 (66.2%) patients (difference, 4.0% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -2.39% to 10.42%]); and (2) combined symptomatic resolution/microbiological eradication at test of cure (TOC): 280 of 393 (71.2%) vs 269 of 417 (64.5%) patients (difference, 6.7% [95% CI, .30% to 13.12%]). Microbiological eradication at TOC (European Medicines Agency primary endpoint) occurred in 304 of 393 (77.4%) ceftazidime-avibactam vs 296 of 417 (71.0%) doripenem patients (difference, 6.4% [95% CI, .33% to 12.36%]), demonstrating superiority at the 5% significance level. Both treatments showed similar efficacy against ceftazidime-nonsusceptible pathogens. Ceftazidime-avibactam had a safety profile consistent with that of ceftazidime alone. CONCLUSIONS:Ceftazidime-avibactam was highly effective for the empiric treatment of cUTI (including acute pyelonephritis), and may offer an alternative to carbapenems in this setting. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION:NCT01595438; NCT01599806.

SUBMITTER: Wagenlehner FM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4996135 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Ceftazidime-avibactam Versus Doripenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis: RECAPTURE, a Phase 3 Randomized Trial Program.

Wagenlehner Florian M FM   Sobel Jack D JD   Newell Paul P   Armstrong Jon J   Huang Xiangning X   Stone Gregory G GG   Yates Katrina K   Gasink Leanne B LB  

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 20160616 6


<h4>Background</h4>The global emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae highlights the urgent need to reduce carbapenem dependence. The phase 3 RECAPTURE program compared the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam and doripenem in patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis.<h4>Methods</h4>Hospitalized adults with suspected or microbiologically confirmed cUTI/acute pyelonephritis were randomized 1:1 to ceftazidime-avibactam 2000 mg/50  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6437548 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4970634 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7038258 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5278708 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6767967 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6880332 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8577399 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7305847 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4356809 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7427448 | biostudies-literature