Dataset Information

Pilot Study of the Importance of Factors Affecting Emergency Department Opioid Analgesic Prescribing Decisions.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Little is known about the factors driving decision-making among emergency department (ED) providers when prescribing opioid analgesics (OA). The aim of this pilot study was to identify the importance of factors influencing OA-prescribing decisions and to determine how this varied among different types of providers.

Methods

This was an observational cross-sectional survey study of 203 ED providers. The importance of decisional factors was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Differences between provider groups were tested using Chi-squared or ANOVA tests where applicable.

Results

Overall, 142/203 (69.9 %) potential respondents participated in the study. The five highest-rated factors were (mean ± SD) patient's opioid prescription history (4.4?±?0.8), patient's history of substance abuse or dependence (4.4?±?0.7), diagnosis thought to be the cause of patient's pain (4.2?±?0.8), clinical gestalt (4.2?±?0.7), and provider's concern about unsafe use of the medication (4.0?±?0.9). The importance of 6 of 21 decisional factors varied significantly between different groups of providers.

Conclusion

In this pilot study of ED providers, the self-reported importance of several factors influencing OA-prescribing decisions were significantly different among attending physicians, resident physicians, and advanced practice providers. Further investigation into how ED providers make OA-prescribing decisions is needed to help guide interventions aimed at improving appropriate pain management.

SUBMITTER: Pomerleau AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4996790 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pilot Study of the Importance of Factors Affecting Emergency Department Opioid Analgesic Prescribing Decisions.

Pomerleau Adam C AC Schrager Justin D JD Morgan Brent W BW

Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology 20160505 3

<h4>Introduction</h4>Little is known about the factors driving decision-making among emergency department (ED) providers when prescribing opioid analgesics (OA). The aim of this pilot study was to identify the importance of factors influencing OA-prescribing decisions and to determine how this varied among different types of providers.<h4>Methods</h4>This was an observational cross-sectional survey study of 203 ED providers. The importance of decisional factors was rated on a 5-point Likert scal ...[more]

PMID: 27150104

Similar Datasets

Project description:STUDY OBJECTIVE:We assess whether an automated prescription drug monitoring program intervention in emergency department (ED) settings is associated with reductions in opioid prescribing and quantities. METHODS:We performed a retrospective cohort study of ED visits by Medicaid beneficiaries. We assessed the staggered implementation (pre-post) of automated prescription drug monitoring program queries at 86 EDs in Washington State from January 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015. The outcomes included any opioid prescribed within 1 day of the index ED visit and total dispensed morphine milligram equivalents. The exposure was the automated prescription drug monitoring program query intervention. We assessed program effects stratified by previous high-risk opioid use. We performed multiple sensitivity analyses, including restriction to pain-related visits, restriction to visits with a confirmed prescription drug monitoring program query, and assessment of 6 specific opioid high-risk indicators. RESULTS:The study included 1,187,237 qualifying ED visits (898,162 preintervention; 289,075 postintervention). Compared with the preintervention period, automated prescription drug monitoring program queries were not significantly associated with reductions in the proportion of visits with opioid prescribing (5.8 per 1,000 encounters; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.11 to 11.8) or the amount of prescribed morphine milligram equivalents (difference 2.66; 95% CI -0.15 to 5.48). There was no evidence of selective reduction in patients with previous high-risk opioid use (1.2 per 1,000 encounters, 95% CI -9.5 to 12.0; morphine milligram equivalents 1.22, 95% CI -3.39 to 5.82). The lack of a selective reduction in high-risk patients was robust to all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION:An automated prescription drug monitoring program query intervention was not associated with reductions in ED opioid prescribing or quantities, even in patients with previous high-risk opioid use.

Project description:ObjectiveAt our emergency department (ED), opioid prescribing guidelines were implemented in September 2016. The opioid prescribing guidelines were adopted and revised from collective efforts and advocacy of the Michigan College of Emergency Physicians for ED-led opioid stewardship. We performed a retrospective before and after study to determine if opioid prescribing guidelines would change the use of intravenous opioids per patient and the morphine equivalent units (MEU) per patient in a suburban academic ED.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care level 1 trauma center with an annual ED volume of ≈ 130,000 visits. All intravenous orders of fentanyl, morphine, and hydromorphone for adult patients from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017, were tabulated. A 3-month (August 2016-October 2016) washout period was used. Poisson and ordinary linear regression analyses were employed to evaluate any difference in number of intravenous opioids ordered before and after adoption of the guidelines. Within our opioid prescribing guidelines was also guidance for oral opioid orders within the ED and oral opioid prescriptions for discharge, although these elements were not included in this investigation.ResultsA total of 108,327 intravenous opioid orders were included in the final analysis. After adoption of the opioid prescribing guidelines, the expected number of intravenous opioids ordered dropped by 3.1% (eβ, 0.969; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.779-1.209), and there was an additional decrease of 0.1% per month (eβ, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.990-1.010). After the adoption of opioid prescribing guidelines, the average MEU dropped by 0.3 mg (95% CI, -0.47 to -0.13), and there was decrease of 0.01 mg per month (95% CI, -0.02 to -0.004).ConclusionAfter the adoption of opioid prescribing guidelines, our analysis suggests that opioid prescribing guidelines are associated with clinically small but statistically significant changes in MEU ordered in ED. We cannot determine if this represented a continued trend of decreased opioid use or associated with the opioid prescribing guidelines.

Dataset Information

Pilot Study of the Importance of Factors Affecting Emergency Department Opioid Analgesic Prescribing Decisions.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Pilot Study of the Importance of Factors Affecting Emergency Department Opioid Analgesic Prescribing Decisions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure