Dataset Information

Add-on LABA in a separate inhaler as asthma step-up therapy versus increased dose of ICS or ICS/LABA combination inhaler.

ABSTRACT: Asthma management guidelines recommend adding a long-acting ?2-agonist (LABA) or increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as step-up therapy for patients with uncontrolled asthma on ICS monotherapy. However, it is uncertain which option works best, which ICS particle size is most effective, and whether LABA should be administered by separate or combination inhalers. This historical, matched cohort study compared asthma-related outcomes for patients (aged 12-80?years) prescribed step-up therapy as a ?50% extrafine ICS dose increase or add-on LABA, via either a separate inhaler or a fine-particle ICS/LABA fixed-dose combination (FDC) inhaler. Risk-domain asthma control was the primary end-point in comparisons of cohorts matched for asthma severity and control during the baseline year. After 1:2 cohort matching, the increased extrafine ICS versus separate ICS+LABA cohorts included 3232 and 6464 patients, respectively, and the fine-particle ICS/LABA FDC versus separate ICS+LABA cohorts included 7529 and 15?058 patients, respectively (overall mean age 42?years; 61-62% females). Over one outcome year, adjusted OR (95% CI) for achieving asthma control were 1.25 (1.13-1.38) for increased ICS versus separate ICS+LABA and 1.06 (1.05-1.09) for ICS/LABA FDC versus separate ICS+LABA. For patients with asthma, increased dose of extrafine-particle ICS, or add-on LABA via ICS/LABA combination inhaler, is associated with significantly better outcomes than ICS+LABA via separate inhalers.

SUBMITTER: Price DB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5005184 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Add-on LABA in a separate inhaler as asthma step-up therapy <i>versus</i> increased dose of ICS or ICS/LABA combination inhaler.

Price David B DB Colice Gene G Israel Elliot E Roche Nicolas N Postma Dirkje S DS Guilbert Theresa W TW van Aalderen Willem M C WM Grigg Jonathan J Hillyer Elizabeth V EV Thomas Victoria V Martin Richard J RJ

ERJ open research 20160401 2

Asthma management guidelines recommend adding a long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist (LABA) or increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as step-up therapy for patients with uncontrolled asthma on ICS monotherapy. However, it is uncertain which option works best, which ICS particle size is most effective, and whether LABA should be administered by separate or combination inhalers. This historical, matched cohort study compared asthma-related outcomes for patients (aged 12-80 years) prescr ...[more]

PMID: 27730200

Similar Datasets

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Products based on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) combinations may provide different clinical benefits. This study was conducted to compare the rapid effects of three such combination products: formoterol/fluticasone (FFC) aerosol (pMDI), formoterol/budesonide (FBC) dry powder inhaler (DPI), and vilanterol/fluticasone furoate (VFC) DPI. METHODS:The study design was a three-armed, randomized, crossover study. Patients included in the study had stable moderate asthma, defined as an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score ≤ 0.75, and were undergoing step 2 or 3 asthma treatment as defined by JGL2015. Subjects were treated with fluticasone propionate inhaled via Diskus® during a 2-week washout period before randomization. At visit 2, subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to FFC, FBC, or VFC, and evaluated for changes in pulmonary function over time. At visits 3 and 4, the treatment was switched to another ICS/LABA combination in a crossover manner after a 1-week washout period. Spirometry was performed pre-dose and at 3, 10, and 30 min post-dose, and forced oscillation was implemented pre-dose and at 1, 7, 15, and 60 min post-dose. RESULTS:Fifteen outpatients (63.3 ± 9.5 years, ACQ: 0.13 ± 0.19) completed the study. ∆FEV1 at 3 min did not significantly differ among the three groups. Significant increases in FEV1 and %FEV1 from baseline were observed in the FFC (p = 0.004, 0.003), FBC (p = 0.014, 0.011), and VFC (p = 0.032, 0.023) groups at 30 min. Improvements in respiratory resistance at 5-20 Hz from baseline at 60 min, resonant frequency, respiratory system reactance at 5 Hz, and low-frequency reactance area from baseline were observed at 1 min in the FFC group (p = 0.014, 0.002, 0.027, 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION:FFC administered using a pMDI showed favorable delivery to peripheral airways and significantly more rapid action promptly after inhalation as compared with other ICS/LABA preparations inhaled using a DPI, thus broadening the potential therapeutic options for asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:UMIN000029379. FUNDING:Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Project description:Asthma guidelines suggest that therapy can be reduced once asthma is controlled. Despite these recommendations, asthmatic patients are seldom stepped down in clinical practice, and questions remain about when and how to reduce asthma therapy. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate lung function and asthma control in patients who were stepped down from the highest recommended dose of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting ?2 agonist combination therapy.This was a prospective, randomised, controlled, two-arm parallel group study. Asthmatic patients who were fully controlled with a high daily dose (1000/100??g) of fluticasone/salmeterol were randomly assigned to 6?months of open-label treatment with either 500/100??g fluticasone/salmeterol Diskus daily or 400/24??g extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol pMDI daily. The primary outcome was the change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) values between baseline and the end of treatment. The secondary outcomes included asthma control and exacerbation frequency.Four hundred twenty-two patients were included in the analysis. The PEF values remained above 95% of the predicted values throughout the study. The end-study morning PEF rates showed equivalence between the groups (difference between means, 2.49?L/min; 95% CI, -13.43 to 18.42). No changes from baseline were detected in PEF and forced expiratory volume in 1 second measured at the clinics, in the symptom scores or in the use of rescue medication. Asthma control was maintained in 95.2% of the patients at 6?months. No significant differences between the groups were detected in any other parameter, including exacerbation frequency and adverse events.Stepping down patients whose asthma is controlled with the highest recommended dose of fluticasone/salmeterol to either 500/100??g fluticasone/salmeterol daily or 400/24??g extra-fine beclomethasone/formoterol daily provides comparable maintenance of lung function and asthma control.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00497237.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Loss of bronchoprotection (LOBP) with a regularly used long-acting ?2-adrenergic receptor agonist (LABA) is well documented. LOBP has been attributed to ?2-adrenergic receptor (B2AR) downregulation, a process requiring farnesylation, which is inhibited by alendronate. OBJECTIVE:We sought to determine whether alendronate can reduce LABA-associated LOBP in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-treated patients. METHODS:We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design, proof-of-concept trial. Seventy-eight participants with persistent asthma receiving 250 ?g of fluticasone twice daily for 2 weeks were randomized to receive alendronate or placebo while initiating salmeterol for 8 weeks. Salmeterol-protected methacholine challenges (SPMChs) and PBMC B2AR numbers (radioligand binding assay) and signaling (cyclic AMP ELISA) were assessed before randomization and after 8 weeks of ICS plus LABA treatment. LOBP was defined as a more than 1 doubling dose reduction in SPMCh PC20 value. RESULTS:The mean doubling dose reduction in SPMCh PC20 value was 0.50 and 0.27 with alendronate and placebo, respectively (P = .62). Thirty-eight percent of participants receiving alendronate and 33% receiving placebo had LOBP (P = .81). The after/before ICS plus LABA treatment ratio of B2AR number was 1.0 for alendronate (P = .86) and 0.8 for placebo (P = .15; P = .31 for difference between treatments). The B2AR signaling ratio was 0.89 for alendronate (P = .43) and 1.02 for placebo (P = .84; P = .44 for difference). Changes in lung function and B2AR number and signaling were similar between those who did and did not experience LOBP. CONCLUSION:This study did not find evidence that alendronate reduces LABA-associated LOBP, which relates to the occurrence of LOBP in only one third of participants. LOBP appears to be less common than presumed in concomitant ICS plus LABA-treated asthmatic patients. B2AR downregulation measured in PBMCs does not appear to reflect LOBP.

Dataset Information

Add-on LABA in a separate inhaler as asthma step-up therapy versus increased dose of ICS or ICS/LABA combination inhaler.

Publications

Add-on LABA in a separate inhaler as asthma step-up therapy <i>versus</i> increased dose of ICS or ICS/LABA combination inhaler.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets