Dataset Information

What is a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Leg-Extensor Power for Mobility-limited Older Adults?

ABSTRACT:

Background

Muscle power is a key predictor of physical function in older adults; however, clinically meaningful improvements in leg-extensor muscle power have yet to be identified. The purpose of this study is to establish the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and substantial improvement (SI) for leg-extensor power and muscle contraction velocity in mobility-limited older adults.

Methods

Data were extracted from three randomized trials of leg-extensor muscle power training interventions (3- to 6-month duration). Measurements of leg-extensor power and velocity were obtained using dynamic bilateral leg press at 40% and 70% of the one-repetition maximum. Anchor-based MCIIs were calculated using selected items extracted from the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument. Standard error of measurement and effect size methods were used to calculate the distribution-based MCII.

Results

Data from 164 participants (mean age: 76.6 ± 5.6 years; Short Physical Performance Battery score: 7.8 ± 1.3) were used in this analysis. The respective MCII and SI estimates for 40% leg-extensor power were 18.3 (9%) and 30.5 (15%) W, and 23.1 (10%) and 41.6 (18%) W for 70% leg-extensor power. The respective MCII and SI estimates for 40% average velocity were 0.03(7%) and 0.08(18%) m/s, and 0.02(6%) and 0.05(15%) m/s for 70% average velocity.

Conclusions

This is the first study to establish a clinically meaningful improvement of leg-extensor power (9%-10%) and velocity (6%-7%) in mobility-limited older adults. These findings should be used to aid in the design and interpretation of clinical trials and interventions that target improvements in muscle power in this high-risk population.

SUBMITTER: Kirn DR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5007740 | biostudies-literature | 2016 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

What is a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Leg-Extensor Power for Mobility-limited Older Adults?

Kirn Dylan R DR Reid Kieran F KF Hau Cynthia C Phillips Edward M EM Fielding Roger A RA

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 20151118 5

<h4>Background</h4>Muscle power is a key predictor of physical function in older adults; however, clinically meaningful improvements in leg-extensor muscle power have yet to be identified. The purpose of this study is to establish the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and substantial improvement (SI) for leg-extensor power and muscle contraction velocity in mobility-limited older adults.<h4>Methods</h4>Data were extracted from three randomized trials of leg-extensor muscle power tr ...[more]

PMID: 26582075

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundClinically meaningful changes in the five-repetition chair stand test are essential for monitoring mobility in integrated care for older people. Recommendations for the clinically meaningful change of the chair stand test are not well known. Our study aimed to estimate the absolute and relative clinically meaningful changes for older adults' five-repetition chair stand test.MethodsWe applied distribution-based and anchor-based methods in addition to receiver operator characteristics analyses to a population-based study of community-dwelling adults (SAGE Mexico study, n = 897) to derive the clinically meaningful change in the chair stand test. We used three self-reported clinical anchors: moving around, vigorous activities, and walking 1 km. Our primary outcome was the incidence of disability for basic activities of daily living (ADL). Secondly, we examined our estimates of clinically meaningful change in a clinical trial population of healthy volunteers (MAPT, France, study n = 1575) concerning the risk of incident ADL disability.ResultsThe age of SAGE Mexico participants ranged from 60 to 96 years; mean (SD) = 69.0 (6.2); 54.4% were female. Their baseline chair stand time averaged 12.1 s (SD = 3 s). Forty-eight participants (5.6%) showed incident disability over 3 years. The absolute and relative clinically meaningful change cut points found over 3 years of follow-up were 2.6 s and 27.7%, respectively. Absolute clinically meaningful change ranged from 0.5 to 4.7 s, depending on the estimation method. Relative clinically meaningful change ranged from 9.6 to 46.2%. SAGE Mexico participants with absolute and relative clinically meaningful declines (increasing 2.6 s and 27.7% from baseline time, respectively) showed an increased risk of ADL disability [aRR = 1.93; P = 0.0381; 95% CI (1.05, 3.46) and aRR = 2.27; P = 0.0157; 95% CI (1.22, 4.10)], respectively, compared with those without a clinically meaningful decline. MAPT participants [age range = 70-94; mean (SD) = 75.3 (4.4); 64.8% female; incident ADL disability over 5 years = 145(14.8%)] with a relative clinically meaningful decline (≥27.7% from baseline over 3 years) had a 74% higher risk of incident ADL disability than their counterparts [aHR = 1.74; P = 0.016; CI95% (1.11, 2.72); mean follow-up of 58 months].ConclusionsCommunity-dwelling older adults with an increase of 3 s or 28% in chair stand test performance over 3 years (approximately 1 s or 10% per year) could be the target of interventions to enhance mobility and prevent incident disability.

Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of hospitalizations on patterns of sedentary and physical activity time in mobility-limited older adults randomized to structured physical activity or health education.DesignSecondary analysis of investigator-blinded, parallel-group, randomized trial conducted at 8 U.S. centers between February 2010 and December 2013.ParticipantsSedentary men and women aged 70 to 89 at baseline who wore a hip-fitted accelerometer 7 consecutive days at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months after randomization (N=1,341).MeasurementsParticipants were randomized to a physical activity (PA; n = 669) intervention that included aerobic, resistance, and flexibility training or to a health education (HE; n = 672) intervention that consisted of workshops on older adult health and light upper-extremity stretching. Accelerometer patterns were characterized as bouts of sedentary (<100 counts/min; ≥1, ≥10, ≥30, ≥60 minute lengths) and activity (≥100 counts/min; ≥1, ≥2, ≥5, ≥10 minute lengths) time. Each participant was categorized as having 0, 1 to 3, or 4 or more cumulative hospital days before each accelerometer assessment.ResultsHospitalization increased sedentary time similarly in both intervention groups (8 min/d for 1-3 cumulative hospital days and 16 min/d for ≥4 cumulative hospital days). Hospitalization was also associated with less physical activity time across all bouts of less than 10 minutes (≥1: -7 min/d for 1-3 cumulative hospital days, -16 min/d for ≥4 cumulative hospital days; ≥2: -5 min/d for 1-3 cumulative hospital days, -11 min/d for ≥4 cumulative hospital days; ≥5: -3 min/d for 1-3 cumulative hospital days, -4 min/d for ≥4 cumulative hospital days). There was no evidence of recovery to prehospitalization levels (time effect p >.41). PA participants had less sedentary time in bouts of less than 30 minutes than HE participants (-8 to -10 min/d) and more total activity (+3 to +6 min/d), although hospital-related changes were similar between the intervention groups (interaction effect p >.26).ConclusionParticipating in a PA intervention before hospitalization had expected benefits, but participants remained susceptible to hospitalization's detrimental effects on their daily activity levels. There was no evidence of better activity recovery after hospitalization. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:261-268, 2019.

Dataset Information

What is a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Leg-Extensor Power for Mobility-limited Older Adults?

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

What is a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Leg-Extensor Power for Mobility-limited Older Adults?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets