Dataset Information

Genealogical Working Distributions for Bayesian Model Testing with Phylogenetic Uncertainty.

ABSTRACT: Marginal likelihood estimates to compare models using Bayes factors frequently accompany Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Approaches to estimate marginal likelihoods have garnered increased attention over the past decade. In particular, the introduction of path sampling (PS) and stepping-stone sampling (SS) into Bayesian phylogenetics has tremendously improved the accuracy of model selection. These sampling techniques are now used to evaluate complex evolutionary and population genetic models on empirical data sets, but considerable computational demands hamper their widespread adoption. Further, when very diffuse, but proper priors are specified for model parameters, numerical issues complicate the exploration of the priors, a necessary step in marginal likelihood estimation using PS or SS. To avoid such instabilities, generalized SS (GSS) has recently been proposed, introducing the concept of "working distributions" to facilitate--or shorten--the integration process that underlies marginal likelihood estimation. However, the need to fix the tree topology currently limits GSS in a coalescent-based framework. Here, we extend GSS by relaxing the fixed underlying tree topology assumption. To this purpose, we introduce a "working" distribution on the space of genealogies, which enables estimating marginal likelihoods while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty. We propose two different "working" distributions that help GSS to outperform PS and SS in terms of accuracy when comparing demographic and evolutionary models applied to synthetic data and real-world examples. Further, we show that the use of very diffuse priors can lead to a considerable overestimation in marginal likelihood when using PS and SS, while still retrieving the correct marginal likelihood using both GSS approaches. The methods used in this article are available in BEAST, a powerful user-friendly software package to perform Bayesian evolutionary analyses.

SUBMITTER: Baele G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5009437 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genealogical Working Distributions for Bayesian Model Testing with Phylogenetic Uncertainty.

Baele Guy G Lemey Philippe P Suchard Marc A MA

Systematic biology 20151101 2

Marginal likelihood estimates to compare models using Bayes factors frequently accompany Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Approaches to estimate marginal likelihoods have garnered increased attention over the past decade. In particular, the introduction of path sampling (PS) and stepping-stone sampling (SS) into Bayesian phylogenetics has tremendously improved the accuracy of model selection. These sampling techniques are now used to evaluate complex evolutionary and population genetic models on ...[more]

PMID: 26526428

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundUncertainty in comparative analyses can come from at least two sources: a) phylogenetic uncertainty in the tree topology or branch lengths, and b) uncertainty due to intraspecific variation in trait values, either due to measurement error or natural individual variation. Most phylogenetic comparative methods do not account for such uncertainties. Not accounting for these sources of uncertainty leads to false perceptions of precision (confidence intervals will be too narrow) and inflated significance in hypothesis testing (e.g. p-values will be too small). Although there is some application-specific software for fitting Bayesian models accounting for phylogenetic error, more general and flexible software is desirable.MethodsWe developed models to directly incorporate phylogenetic uncertainty into a range of analyses that biologists commonly perform, using a Bayesian framework and Markov Chain Monte Carlo analyses.ResultsWe demonstrate applications in linear regression, quantification of phylogenetic signal, and measurement error models. Phylogenetic uncertainty was incorporated by applying a prior distribution for the phylogeny, where this distribution consisted of the posterior tree sets from Bayesian phylogenetic tree estimation programs. The models were analysed using simulated data sets, and applied to a real data set on plant traits, from rainforest plant species in Northern Australia. Analyses were performed using the free and open source software OpenBUGS and JAGS.ConclusionsIncorporating phylogenetic uncertainty through an empirical prior distribution of trees leads to more precise estimation of regression model parameters than using a single consensus tree and enables a more realistic estimation of confidence intervals. In addition, models incorporating measurement errors and/or individual variation, in one or both variables, are easily formulated in the Bayesian framework. We show that BUGS is a useful, flexible general purpose tool for phylogenetic comparative analyses, particularly for modelling in the face of phylogenetic uncertainty and accounting for measurement error or individual variation in explanatory variables. Code for all models is provided in the BUGS model description language.

Project description:BackgroundAfrican trypanosomiasis is a tsetse-borne parasitic infection that affects humans, wildlife, and domesticated animals. Tsetse flies are endemic to much of Sub-Saharan Africa and a spatial and temporal understanding of tsetse habitat can aid surveillance and support disease risk management. Problematically, current fine spatial resolution remote sensing data are delivered with a temporal lag and are relatively coarse temporal resolution (e.g., 16 days), which results in disease control models often targeting incorrect places. The goal of this study was to devise a heuristic for identifying tsetse habitat (at a fine spatial resolution) into the future and in the temporal gaps where remote sensing and proximal data fail to supply information.MethodsThis paper introduces a generalizable and scalable open-access version of the tsetse ecological distribution (TED) model used to predict tsetse distributions across space and time, and contributes a geospatial Bayesian Maximum Entropy (BME) prediction model trained by TED output data to forecast where, herein the Morsitans group of tsetse, persist in Kenya, a method that mitigates the temporal lag problem. This model facilitates identification of tsetse habitat and provides critical information to control tsetse, mitigate the impact of trypanosomiasis on vulnerable human and animal populations, and guide disease minimization in places with ephemeral tsetse. Moreover, this BME analysis is one of the first to utilize cluster and parallel computing along with a Monte Carlo analysis to optimize BME computations. This allows for the analysis of an exceptionally large dataset (over 2 billion data points) at a finer resolution and larger spatiotemporal scale than what had previously been possible.ResultsUnder the most conservative assessment for Kenya, the BME kriging analysis showed an overall prediction accuracy of 74.8% (limited to the maximum suitability extent). In predicting tsetse distribution outcomes for the entire country the BME kriging analysis was 97% accurate in its forecasts.ConclusionsThis work offers a solution to the persistent temporal data gap in accurate and spatially precise rainfall predictions and the delayed processing of remotely sensed data collectively in the - 45 days past to + 180 days future temporal window. As is shown here, the BME model is a reliable alternative for forecasting future tsetse distributions to allow preplanning for tsetse control. Furthermore, this model provides guidance on disease control that would otherwise not be available. These 'big data' BME methods are particularly useful for large domain studies. Considering that past BME studies required reduction of the spatiotemporal grid to facilitate analysis. Both the GEE-TED and the BME libraries have been made open source to enable reproducibility and offer continual updates into the future as new remotely sensed data become available.

Project description:A two-layer model based on the integrated form of Richards' equation (RE) was recently developed to simulate the soil water movement in the roots layer and the vadose zone with a relatively shallow and dynamic water table. The model simulates thickness-averaged volumetric water content and matric suction as opposed to point values and was numerically verified for three soil textures using HYDRUS as a benchmark. However, the strengths and limitations of the two-layer model and its performance in stratified soils and under actual field conditions have not been tested. This study further examined the two-layer model using two numerical verification experiments and, most importantly, tested its performance at site-level under actual, highly variable hydroclimate conditions. Moreover, model parameters were estimated and uncertainty and sources of errors were quantified using a Bayesian framework. First, the two-layer model was evaluated for 231 soil textures under varying soil layer thicknesses with a uniform soil profile. Second, the two-layer model was assessed for stratified conditions where the top and bottom soil layers have contrasting hydraulic conductivities. The model was evaluated by comparing soil moisture and flux estimates to those from the HYDRUS model. Last, a case study of model application using data from a Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) site was presented. Bayesian Monte Carlo (BMC) method was implemented for model calibration and quantifying sources of uncertainty under real hydroclimate and soil conditions. For a homogeneous soil profile, the two-layer model generally had excellent performance in estimating volumetric water content and fluxes, while the model performance slightly declined with increasing layer thickness and coarser textured soils. The model configurations regarding layer thicknesses and soil textures that generate accurate soil moisture and flux estimations were further suggested. With the two layers of contrasting permeability, model-simulated soil moisture contents and fluxes agreed well with those computed by HYDRUS, indicating that the two-layer model accurately handles the water flow dynamics around the layer interface. In the field application, given the highly variable hydroclimate conditions, the two-layer model combined with the BMC method showed good agreement with the observed average soil moisture of the root zone and the vadose zone below (RMSE <0.021 during calibration and <0.023 during validation periods). The contribution of parametric uncertainty to the total model uncertainty was too small compared to other sources. The numerical tests and the site level application showed that the two-layer model can reliably simulate thickness-averaged soil moisture and estimate fluxes in the vadose zone under various soil and hydroclimate conditions. Results also indicated that the BMC method could be a robust framework for vadose zone hydraulic parameters identification and model uncertainty estimation.

Dataset Information

Genealogical Working Distributions for Bayesian Model Testing with Phylogenetic Uncertainty.

Publications

Genealogical Working Distributions for Bayesian Model Testing with Phylogenetic Uncertainty.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets