Dataset Information

Ranibizumab for the Prevention of Radiation Complications in Patients Treated With Proton Beam Irradiation for Choroidal Melanoma.

ABSTRACT: To investigate the safety and potential efficacy of ranibizumab for prevention of radiation complications in patients treated with proton irradiation for choroidal melanoma.Forty patients with tumors located within 2 disc diameters of the optic nerve and/or macula were enrolled in this open-label study. Participants received ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg at tumor localization and every 2 months thereafter for the study duration of 24 months. The incidence of adverse events, visual acuity, and other measures of ocular morbidity related to radiation complications were assessed. Historical controls with similar follow-up meeting the eligibility criteria for tumor size, location, and baseline visual acuity were assembled for comparison.Fifteen patients with large tumors and 25 patients with small/medium tumors were enrolled. Thirty-two patients completed the month 24 visit. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events related to ranibizumab were observed. At 24 months, the proportion of patients with visual acuity ? 20/200 was 30/31 (97%) in the study group versus 92/205 (45%) in historical controls (P < .001). The proportion of patients with visual acuity ?20/40 was 24/31 (77%) in the study group versus 46/205 (22%) in controls at 24 months (P<.001). Clinical evidence of radiation maculopathy at month 24 was seen in 8/24 (33%) patients with small/medium tumors versus 42/62 (68%) of controls (P = .004). Three patients with large tumors developed metastases.In this small pilot study, prophylactic ranibizumab appears generally safe in patients treated with proton irradiation for choroidal melanoma. High rates of visual acuity retention were observed through 2 years.

SUBMITTER: Kim IK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5012854 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Ranibizumab for the Prevention of Radiation Complications in Patients Treated With Proton Beam Irradiation for Choroidal Melanoma.

Kim Ivana K IK Lane Anne Marie AM Jain Purva P Awh Caroline C Gragoudas Evangelos S ES

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 20160801

<h4>Purpose</h4>To investigate the safety and potential efficacy of ranibizumab for prevention of radiation complications in patients treated with proton irradiation for choroidal melanoma.<h4>Methods</h4>Forty patients with tumors located within 2 disc diameters of the optic nerve and/or macula were enrolled in this open-label study. Participants received ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg at tumor localization and every 2 months thereafter for the study duration of 24 months. The incidence of advers ...[more]

PMID: 27630373

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAlthough radiotherapy has been used more frequently in past decades for the management of large melanomas, long-term efficacy of proton beam irradiation (PBI) of large choroidal melanomas has not been reported.ObjectiveTo evaluate long-term outcomes in patients who underwent PBI for the treatment of large choroidal melanomas.Design, setting, and participantsData were obtained at a single Boston, Massachusetts, academic tertiary referral practice for this retrospective cohort study. In total, 336 patients with large tumors treated over a 13-year period from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1997, and followed up until the end points were reached or until December 31, 2008, were included. Data analyses were initially completed in February 2017 and finalized in July 2017. Large tumors were those with a height 10 mm or greater or a longest linear diameter greater than 16 mm or a height greater than 8 mm when the optic nerve was involved.InterventionProton beam irradiation (total 70 Gy) delivered in 5 equal fractions.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcomes of rates of visual acuity retention, eye retention, tumor recurrence, and melanoma-related mortality were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were completed to evaluate risk factors for tumor recurrence and melanoma-related mortality.ResultsIn this cohort of 336 patients with large tumors, 150 were women and 329 were white; mean (SD) age was 60.0 (14.0) years. Of 178 patients without optic nerve involvement (tumor >1 disc diameter from optic nerve), the mean (SD) largest basal diameter was 18.1 (1.9) mm and mean height was 8.2 (2.7) mm. Optic nerve involvement and tumors greater than 8 mm were observed in 109 patients (32.4% of the cohort). Baseline visual acuity of 20/200 or better was observed in 244 patients (72.6%), and worse than 20/800 in 52 (15.5%). Ten-year rates of visual acuity retention were 8.7% (95% CI, 4.1%-15.6%) for at least 20/200 and 22.4% (95% CI, 15.4%-30.4%) for at least counting fingers. Ten years after PBI therapy, the eye was retained (70.4%; 95% CI, 61.5%-77.6%) and tumor controlled (87.5%; 95% CI, 76.8%-93.5%) in most patients. The 10-year all-cause mortality rate was 60.7% (95% CI, 55.5%-65.9%). Approximately half of the patients died of metastatic uveal melanoma (10-year rate, 48.5%; 95% CI, 43.0%-54.4%).Conclusions and relevanceThis study demonstrates that eye conservation is possible in most cases, with ambulatory vision retained in a small proportion of patients 10 years after PBI. Tumor recurrence rates were low and mortality rates were comparable to those observed after enucleation.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of proton beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients with breast cancer who require regional nodal irradiation.MethodsPatients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who required postoperative RT to the breast/chest wall and regional lymphatics and who were considered suboptimal candidates for conventional RT were eligible. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis (RP) or any grade 4 toxicity within 3 months of RT. Secondary end points were 5-year locoregional failure, overall survival, and acute and late toxicities per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Strain echocardiography and cardiac biomarkers were obtained before and after RT to assess early cardiac changes.ResultsSeventy patients completed RT between 2011 and 2016. Median follow-up was 55 months (range, 17 to 82 months). Of 69 evaluable patients, median age was 45 years (range, 24 to 70 years). Sixty-three patients (91%) had left-sided breast cancer, two had bilateral breast cancer, and five had right-sided breast cancer. Sixty-five (94%) had stage II to III breast cancer. Sixty-eight (99%) received systemic chemotherapy. Fifty (72%) underwent immediate reconstruction. Median dose to the chest wall/breast was 49.7 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) and to the internal mammary nodes, 48.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness), which indicates comprehensive coverage. Among 62 surviving patients, the 5-year rates for locoregional failure and overall survival were 1.5% and 91%, respectively. One patient developed grade 2 RP, and none developed grade 3 RP. No grade 4 toxicities occurred. The unplanned surgical re-intervention rate at 5 years was 33%. No significant changes in echocardiography or cardiac biomarkers after RT were found.ConclusionProton beam RT for breast cancer has low toxicity rates and similar rates of disease control compared with historical data of conventional RT. No early cardiac changes were observed, which paves the way for randomized studies to compare proton beam RT with standard RT.

Project description:PurposeProton beam therapy is a commonly accepted treatment for intraocular melanomas, but the literature is lacking in descriptions of patient preferences of clinical outcomes and economic impact. In addition, no economic evaluations have been published regarding the incremental cost-effectiveness of proton beam therapy compared with enucleation or plaque brachytherapy, typical alternative treatments. We, therefore, conducted a cost-utility analysis of these three approaches for the treatment of intraocular melanomas.Materials and methodsA Markov model was constructed. Model parameters were identified from the published literature and publicly available data sources. Cost-effectiveness of each treatment was calculated in 2011 US Dollars per quality-adjusted life-year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated assuming enucleation as reference. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted on all model parameters. A decision threshold of $50,000/quality-adjusted life-year was used to determine cost-effectiveness.ResultsEnucleation had the lowest costs and quality-adjusted life-years, and plaque brachytherapy had the highest costs and quality-adjusted life-years. Compared with enucleation, the base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for plaque brachytherapy and proton beam therapy were $77,500/quality-adjusted life-year and $106,100/quality-adjusted life-year, respectively. Results were highly sensitive to multiple parameters. All three treatments were considered optimal, and even dominant, depending on the values used for sensitive parameters.ConclusionBase-case analysis results suggest enucleation to be optimal. However, the optimal choice was not robust to sensitivity analyses and, depending on the assumption, both plaque brachytherapy and proton beam therapy could be considered cost-effective. Future clinical studies should focus on generating further evidence with the greatest parameter uncertainty to inform future cost-effectiveness analyses.

Dataset Information

Ranibizumab for the Prevention of Radiation Complications in Patients Treated With Proton Beam Irradiation for Choroidal Melanoma.

Publications

Ranibizumab for the Prevention of Radiation Complications in Patients Treated With Proton Beam Irradiation for Choroidal Melanoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets