Dataset Information

The National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center Global Health Scholars and Fellows Program: Collaborating Across Five Consortia to Strengthen Research Training.

ABSTRACT: As demand for global health research training continues to grow, many universities are striving to meet the needs of trainees in a manner complementary to research priorities of the institutions hosting trainees, while also increasing capacity for conducting research. We provide an overview of the first 4 years of the Global Health Program for Fellows and Scholars, a collaboration of 20 U.S. universities and institutions spread across 36 low- and middle-income countries funded through the National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center. We highlight many aspects of our program development that may be of interest to other multinational consortia developing global health research training programs.

SUBMITTER: Zunt JR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5014285 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center Global Health Scholars and Fellows Program: Collaborating Across Five Consortia to Strengthen Research Training.

Zunt Joseph R JR Chi Benjamin H BH Heimburger Douglas C DC Cohen Craig R CR Strathdee Steffanie S Hobbs Nicole N Thomas Yolanda Y Bale Kimberly K Salisbury Kathryn K Hernandez Maria T MT Riley Lee W LW Vermund Sten H SH van der Horst Charles C

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene 20160705 3

As demand for global health research training continues to grow, many universities are striving to meet the needs of trainees in a manner complementary to research priorities of the institutions hosting trainees, while also increasing capacity for conducting research. We provide an overview of the first 4 years of the Global Health Program for Fellows and Scholars, a collaboration of 20 U.S. universities and institutions spread across 36 low- and middle-income countries funded through the Nation ...[more]

PMID: 27382074

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe Fogarty International Center (FIC) has supported research capacity development for over twenty years. While the mission of FIC is supporting and facilitating global health research conducted by U.S. and international investigators, building partnerships between health research institutions in the U.S. and abroad, and training the next generation of scientists to address global health needs, research capacity may impact health policies and programs and therefore have positive impacts on public health. We conducted an exploratory analysis of how FIC research training investments affected public health policy and program development in Kenya and Uganda.MethodsWe explored the long term impacts of all FIC supported research training programs using case studies, in Kenya and Uganda. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 53 respondents and 29 focus group discussion participants across the two countries. Qualitative methods were supplemented by structured surveys of trainees and document review, including a review of evidence cited in policy documents.ResultsIn the primary focal areas of FIC grants, notably HIV/AIDS, there were numerous examples of work conducted by former FIC trainees that influenced national and global policies. Facilitators for this influence included the strong technical skills and scientific reputations of the trainees, and professional networks spanning research and policy communities. Barriers included the fact that trainees typically had not received training in research communication, relatively few policy makers had received scientific training, and institutional constraints that undermined alignment of research with policy needs.ConclusionsWhile FIC has not focused its programs on the goal of policy and program influence, its investments have affected global and national public health policies and practice. These influences have occurred primarily through strengthening research skills of scientists and developing strong in-country networks. Further success of FIC and similar initiatives could be stimulated by investing more in the training of policy-makers, seeking to better align research with policy needs through more grants that are awarded directly to developing country institutions, and grants that better incorporate policy maker perspectives in their design and governance. Addressing structural constraints, for example supporting the development of national research agendas that inform university research, would further support such efforts.

Project description:ObjectiveInternational research fellows have been historically involved in academic neurosurgery in the United States (US). To date, the contribution of international research fellows has been underreported. Herein, the authors aimed to quantify the academic output of international research fellows in the Department of Neurosurgery at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.MethodsResearch fellows with Doctor of Medicine (MD), Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), or MD/PhD degrees from a non-US institution who worked in the Hopkins Department of Neurosurgery for at least 6 months over the past decade (2010-2020) were included in this study. Publications produced during fellowship, number of citations, and journal impact factors (IFs) were analyzed using ANOVA. A survey was sent to collect information on personal background, demographics, and academic activities.ResultsSixty-four international research fellows were included, with 42 (65.6%) having MD degrees, 17 (26.6%) having PhD degrees, and 5 (7.8%) having MD/PhD degrees. During an average 27.9 months of fellowship, 460 publications were produced in 136 unique journals, with 8628 citations and a cumulative journal IF of 1665.73. There was no significant difference in total number of publications, first-author publications, and total citations per person among the different degree holders. Persons holding MD/PhDs had a higher number of citations per publication per person (p = 0.027), whereas those with MDs had higher total IFs per person (p = 0.048). Among the 43 (67.2%) survey responders, 34 (79.1%) had nonimmigrant visas at the start of the fellowship, 16 (37.2%) were self-paid or funded by their country of origin, and 35 (81.4%) had mentored at least one US medical student, nonmedical graduate student, or undergraduate student.ConclusionsInternational research fellows at the authors' institution have contributed significantly to academic neurosurgery. Although they have faced major challenges like maintaining nonimmigrant visas, negotiating cultural/language differences, and managing self-sustainability, their scientific productivity has been substantial. Additionally, the majority of fellows have provided reciprocal mentorship to US students.

Project description:BackgroundAdministrative data can be useful for stroke research but have historically lacked data on stroke severity. Hospitals increasingly report the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score using an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code, but this code's validity remains unclear.MethodsWe examined the concordance of ICD-10 NIHSS scores versus NIHSS scores recorded in CAESAR (Cornell Acute Stroke Academic Registry). We included all patients with acute ischemic stroke from October 1, 2015, when US hospitals transitioned to ICD-10, through 2018, the latest year in our registry. The NIHSS score (range, 0-42) recorded in our registry served as the reference gold standard. ICD-10 NIHSS scores were derived from hospital discharge diagnosis code R29.7xx, with the latter 2 digits representing the NIHSS score. Multiple logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with availability of ICD-10 NIHSS scores. We used ANOVA to examine the proportion of variation (R2) in the true (registry) NIHSS score that was explained by the ICD-10 NIHSS score.ResultsAmong 1357 patients, 395 (29.1%) had an ICD-10 NIHSS score recorded. This proportion increased from 0% in 2015 to 46.5% in 2018. In a logistic regression model, only higher registry NIHSS score (odds ratio per point, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03-1.07]) and cardioembolic stroke (odds ratio, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.0-2.0]) were associated with availability of the ICD-10 NIHSS score. In an ANOVA model, the ICD-10 NIHSS score explained almost all the variation in the registry NIHSS score (R2=0.88). Fewer than 10% of patients had a large discordance (≥4 points) between their ICD-10 and registry NIHSS scores.ConclusionsWhen present, ICD-10 codes representing NIHSS scores had excellent agreement with NIHSS scores recorded in our stroke registry. However, ICD-10 NIHSS scores were often missing, especially in less severe strokes, limiting the reliability of these codes for risk adjustment.

Project description:BackgroundReadmissions are a common problem in cardiac surgery. The goal of this study was to examine the frequency, timing, and associated risk factors for readmission after cardiac operations.MethodsA 10-center cohort study prospectively enrolled 5,158 adult cardiac surgical patients (5,059 included in analysis) to assess risk factors for infection after cardiac operations. Data were also collected on all-cause readmissions occurring within 65 days after the operation. Major outcomes included the readmission rate stratified by procedure type, cause of readmission, length of readmission stay, and discharge disposition after readmission. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine risk factors for time to first readmission.ResultsThe overall rate of readmission was 18.7% (number of readmissions, 945). When stratified by the most common procedure type, readmission rates were isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, 14.9% (n = 248); isolated valve, 18.3% (n = 337); and coronary artery bypass grafting plus valve, 25.0% (n = 169). The three most common causes of first readmission within 30 days were infection (17.1% [n = 115]), arrhythmia (17.1% [n = 115]), and volume overload (13.5% [n = 91]). More first readmissions occurred within 30 days (80.6% [n = 672]) than after 30 days (19.4% [n = 162]), and 50% of patients were readmitted within 22 days from the index operation. The median length of stay during the first readmission was 5 days. Discharge in 15.8% of readmitted patients (n = 128) was to a location other than home. Baseline patient characteristics associated with readmission included female gender, diabetes mellitus on medication, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, elevated creatinine, lower hemoglobin, and longer operation time. More complex surgical procedures were associated with an increased risk of readmission compared with the coronary artery bypass grafting group.ConclusionsNearly 1 of 5 patients who undergo cardiac operations require readmission, an outcome with significant health and economic implications. Management practices to avert in-hospital infections, reduce postoperative arrhythmias, and avoid volume overload offer important targets for quality improvement.

Dataset Information

The National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center Global Health Scholars and Fellows Program: Collaborating Across Five Consortia to Strengthen Research Training.

Publications

The National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center Global Health Scholars and Fellows Program: Collaborating Across Five Consortia to Strengthen Research Training.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets