Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel after cryosurgery versus cryosurgery alone for the treatment of hypertrophic and nonhypertrophic actinic keratosis on the dorsal hands.Design
Investigator-blinded split arm study.Setting
Academic institution.Participants
Sixteen subjects with actinic keratoses on dorsal hands.Results
There was a mean reduction in the number of hypertrophic actinic keratosis lesions adjusted for baseline in ingenol mebutate-treated versus control group of -4.3 versus -2.8, respectively. There was a mean reduction in the number of non-hypertrophic actinic keratosis lesions in the ingenol mebutate-treated versus control group of -3.8 versus -0.3.Conclusion
A statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference in response was demonstrated in favor of ingenol mebutate-treated hands versus controls. No significant increase in local skin responses was noted when applying ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel on the same day as cryosurgery.Trial registry
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02251652.
SUBMITTER: Hashim PW
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5022999 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Hashim Peter W PW Nia John K JK Singer Skylar S Goldenberg Gary G
The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology 20160701 7
<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel after cryosurgery versus cryosurgery alone for the treatment of hypertrophic and nonhypertrophic actinic keratosis on the dorsal hands.<h4>Design</h4>Investigator-blinded split arm study.<h4>Setting</h4>Academic institution.<h4>Participants</h4>Sixteen subjects with actinic keratoses on dorsal hands.<h4>Results</h4>There was a mean reduction in the number of hypertrophic actinic keratosis lesions adjusted for ba ...[more]