Dataset Information

Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER.

ABSTRACT: Comparative protein structure modeling predicts the three-dimensional structure of a given protein sequence (target) based primarily on its alignment to one or more proteins of known structure (templates). The prediction process consists of fold assignment, target-template alignment, model building, and model evaluation. This unit describes how to calculate comparative models using the program MODELLER and how to use the ModBase database of such models, and discusses all four steps of comparative modeling, frequently observed errors, and some applications. Modeling lactate dehydrogenase from Trichomonas vaginalis (TvLDH) is described as an example. The download and installation of the MODELLER software is also described. © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

SUBMITTER: Webb B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5031415 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER.

Webb Benjamin B Sali Andrej A

Current protocols in bioinformatics 20160620

Comparative protein structure modeling predicts the three-dimensional structure of a given protein sequence (target) based primarily on its alignment to one or more proteins of known structure (templates). The prediction process consists of fold assignment, target-template alignment, model building, and model evaluation. This unit describes how to calculate comparative models using the program MODELLER and how to use the ModBase database of such models, and discusses all four steps of comparativ ...[more]

PMID: 27322406

Similar Datasets

Project description:Recent advances in protein structure prediction, driven by AlphaFold 2 and machine learning, demonstrate proficiency in static structures but encounter challenges in capturing essential dynamic features crucial for understanding biological function. In this context, homology-based modeling emerges as a cost-effective and computationally efficient alternative. The MODELLER (version 10.5, accessed on 30 November 2023) algorithm can be harnessed for this purpose since it computes intermediate models during simulated annealing, enabling the exploration of attainable configurational states and energies while minimizing its objective function. There have been a few attempts to date to improve the models generated by its algorithm, and in particular, there is no literature regarding the implementation of an averaging procedure involving the intermediate models in the MODELLER algorithm. In this study, we examined MODELLER's output using 225 target-template pairs, extracting the best representatives of intermediate models. Applying an averaging procedure to the selected intermediate structures based on statistical potentials, we aimed to determine: (1) whether averaging improves the quality of structural models during the building phase; (2) if ranking by statistical potentials reliably selects the best models, leading to improved final model quality; (3) whether using a single template versus multiple templates affects the averaging approach; (4) whether the "ensemble" nature of the MODELLER building phase can be harnessed to capture low-energy conformations in holo structures modeling. Our findings indicate that while improvements typically fall short of a few decimal points in the model evaluation metric, a notable fraction of configurations exhibit slightly higher similarity to the native structure than MODELLER's proposed final model. The averaging-building procedure proves particularly beneficial in (1) regions of low sequence identity between the target and template(s), the most challenging aspect of homology modeling; (2) holo protein conformations generation, an area in which MODELLER and related tools usually fall short of the expected performance.

Project description:The ability to predict a protein's three-dimensional conformation represents a crucial starting point for investigating evolutionary connections with other members of the corresponding protein family, examining interactions with other proteins, and potentially utilizing this knowledge for the purpose of rational drug design. In this work, we evaluated the feasibility of improving AlphaFold2's three-dimensional protein predictions by developing a novel pipeline (AlphaMod) that incorporates AlphaFold2 with MODELLER, a template-based modeling program. Additionally, our tool can drive a comprehensive quality assessment of the tertiary protein structure by incorporating and comparing a set of different quality assessment tools. The outcomes of selected tools are combined into a composite score (BORDASCORE) that exhibits a meaningful correlation with GDT_TS and facilitates the selection of optimal models in the absence of a reference structure. To validate AlphaMod's results, we conducted evaluations using two distinct datasets summing up to 72 targets, previously used to independently assess AlphaFold2's performance. The generated models underwent evaluation through two methods: i) averaging the GDT_TS scores across all produced structures for a single target sequence, and ii) a pairwise comparison of the best structures generated by AlphaFold2 and AlphaMod. The latter, within the unsupervised setups, shows a rising accuracy of approximately 34% over AlphaFold2. While, when considering the supervised setup, AlphaMod surpasses AlphaFold2 in 18% of the instances. Finally, there is an 11% correspondence in outcomes between the diverse methodologies. Consequently, AlphaMod's best-predicted tertiary structures in several cases exhibited a significant improvement in the accuracy of the predictions with respect to the best models obtained by AlphaFold2. This pipeline paves the way for the integration of additional data and AI-based algorithms to further improve the reliability of the predictions.

Dataset Information

Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER.

Publications

Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets