Dataset Information

Prognostic Value of Pre-operative Renal Insufficiency in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: The effect of pre-operative renal insufficiency on urothelial carcinoma (UC) prognosis has been investigated by numerous studies. While the majority report worse UC outcomes in patients with renal insufficiency, the results between the studies differed wildly. To enable us to better estimate the prognostic value of renal insufficiency on UC, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the published literature. A total of 16 studies which involved 5,232 patients with UC, investigated the relationship between pre-operative renal insufficiency and disease prognosis. Estimates of combined hazard ratio (HR) for bladder urothelial carcinoma recurrence, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.65 (95% CI, 1.11-2.19), 1.59 (95% CI, 1.14-2.05) and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.19-1.71), respectively; and for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma recurrence, CSS and OS were 2.27 (95% CI, 1.42-3.12), 1.02 (95% CI, 0.47-1.57) and 1.52 (95% CI, 1.05-1.99), respectively. Our results indicate that UC patients with pre-operative renal insufficiency tend to have higher recurrence rates and poorer survival compared to those with clinically normal renal function, thus renal function should be closely monitored in these patients. The impact of intervention for renal insufficiency on the prognosis of UC needs to be further studied.

SUBMITTER: Cao J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5057078 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic Value of Pre-operative Renal Insufficiency in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cao Jian J Zhao Xiaokun X Zhong Zhaohui Z Zhang Lei L Zhu Xuan X Xu Ran R

Scientific reports 20161011

The effect of pre-operative renal insufficiency on urothelial carcinoma (UC) prognosis has been investigated by numerous studies. While the majority report worse UC outcomes in patients with renal insufficiency, the results between the studies differed wildly. To enable us to better estimate the prognostic value of renal insufficiency on UC, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the published literature. A total of 16 studies which involved 5,232 patients with UC, investiga ...[more]

PMID: 27725745

Similar Datasets

Project description:ContextThe role of tumor size in predicting prognosis in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients remains poorly defined.ObjectiveTo assess the prognostic value of tumor size in patients with UTUC through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Evidence acquisitionA comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and Embase databases were performed to identify all relevant articles published up to December 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Available hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were analyzed to evaluate the association between tumor size and survival outcomes.Evidence synthesisA total of 35 articles representing 32 292 patients met the eligibility criteria and were finally included for the meta-analysis. Tumor size was significantly associated with poor outcomes in terms of overall survival (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.28-1.58), cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.47-1.88), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.13-1.38), and intravesical recurrence (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04-1.20). There was between-study heterogeneity in the effect of tumor size on all these meta-analyses, with p < 0.10 and I2 generally >50%. Subgroup analyses illustrated that the association of tumor size with adverse prognosis in UTUC patients is not affected by treatment modalities. Segmental resection of ureter, whether receiving lymph node dissection, cutoff of tumor size, and region of population were potential sources of heterogeneity. The funnel plot test indicated no significant publication bias in the meta-analysis of survival outcomes.ConclusionsThis study shows that larger tumor size is associated with an increased risk of overall and cancer-specific mortality, and disease recurrence in UTUC. Integration of tumor size with other prognostic indicators may help in risk stratification and individualized treatment of UTUC.Patient summaryThrough a systematic review and meta-analysis, this study found that larger tumor size is associated with an increased risk of overall and cancer-specific mortality, and disease recurrence in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Project description:The status of lymph node (LN) metastases plays a decisive role in the selection of surgical procedures and post-operative treatment. Several histopathologic features, known as predictors of LN metastasis, are commonly available post-operatively. Medical imaging improved pre-operative diagnosis, but the results are not fully satisfactory due to substantial false positives. Thus, a reliable and robust method for pre-operative assessment of LN status is urgently required. We developed a prediction model in a training set from the TCGA-BLCA cohort including 196 bladder urothelial carcinoma samples with confirmed LN metastasis status. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was harnessed for dimension reduction, feature selection, and LNM signature building. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop the prognostic model, incorporating the LNM signature, and a genomic mutation of MLL2, and was presented with a LNM nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. Internal validation was evaluated by the testing set from the TCGA cohort and independent validation was assessed by two independent cohorts. The LNM signature, which consisted of 48 selected features, was significantly associated with LN status (p < 0.005 for both the training and testing sets of the TCGA cohort). Predictors contained in the individualized prediction nomogram included the LNM signature and MLL2 mutation status. The model demonstrated good discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 98.7% (85.3% for testing set) and good calibration with p = 0.973 (0.485 for testing set) in the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the LNM nomogram was clinically useful. This study presents a pre-operative nomogram incorporating a LNM signature and a genomic mutation, which can be conveniently utilized to facilitate pre-operative individualized prediction of LN metastasis in patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Dataset Information

Prognostic Value of Pre-operative Renal Insufficiency in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Publications

Prognostic Value of Pre-operative Renal Insufficiency in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets