The role of radiotherapy in the management of localized soft tissue sarcomas.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Tiong SS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5069839 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
The role of radiotherapy in the management of localized soft tissue sarcomas.
Tiong Siaw Sze SS Dickie Colleen C Haas Rick L RL O'Sullivan Brian B
Cancer biology & medicine 20160901 3
The combination of radiotherapy (RT) and function-preserving surgery is the most usual contemporary approach in the management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Pre- and postoperative RT result in similar local control rates, as shown by a landmark trial in extremity STS. In this review, the role of RT in the management of extremity STS will be discussed, but STS in other sites, including retroperitoneal STS, will also be addressed. The focus will consider various aspects of RT including strategies ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Soft-tissue sarcomas are locally aggressive tumours with a tendency to spread haematogenously, especially to the lungs. Most patients present without obvious metastases. Their management is dependent on an adequate incisional biopsy to assess the grade of the tumour. The biopsy incision must be carefully placed so as not to compromise subsequent radical excision. Of patients so treated, 20 to 30% experience local recurrence within the first 3 years postoperatively. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy decreases the incidence of local recurrence to about 15%. Patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas have a greater tendency to suffer recurrence, with disseminated disease throughout the abdomen. The overall 5-year survival rate is about 50%. Patients may, however, have persistent disease or develop metastases beyond the 5-year period. The optimal timing of radiation and chemotherapy remains unresolved, but multimodality treatment at least allows the advocation of limb-sparing procedures for patients with soft-tissue sarcomas.
| S-EPMC5529718 | biostudies-other
Project description:AimTo prospectively assess toxicities of curative-intent intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS).MethodsData from 59 consecutive patients with ESTS between 2014 and 2019 were both retrospectively and prospectively analysed. Toxicity data were collected both by confidential mailed survey (39% completed) and medical charts, and graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Normal tissues dosimetric data (healthy soft tissue segment, joint and bone) were included. The healthy soft tissue segment was created by adding 5 cm on either side of the PTV on CT axial slices, the PTV and bone (and articulation if present) were then removed from the generated volume.ResultsIMRT was delivered post-operatively for nearly half of patients (n = 24, 41%), preoperatively for 18 (31%) and exclusively for 17 (28%; salvage: 13% or immediately inoperable: 15%). The median total dose delivered to the planned target volume (PTV) was 50.4 Gy (36-68 Gy) and 13 patients (22%) received a boost. With a median follow-up of 27 months (6-94 months), a total of 87 late effects were identified in 44/59 (75%) patients: 89% G1-2, and 11% G3-4. The main G1-2 toxicities were: functional limitation (36%), oedema (29%), gait disorders (20%), neurological disorders (20%) and chronic pain (32%). G3-4 toxicities were pain (n = 2), arterial stricture (n = 1) and a chronic wound requiring skin graft (n = 2). No bone fracture was observed. Quality of life was rated as good or very good in 70% patients who completed the survey. Larger (>3500 cm3) healthy soft tissue segment volume was associated with decreased late toxicities (p = 0.02). No other predictive factor of toxicity was identified. The 2-year rates of local control, overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 90%, 90% and 64%, respectively.ConclusionHealthy soft tissue segment volume influenced toxicity. Long-term prospective monitoring in a homogeneous population remains critical to assess the impact of IMRT induced chronic toxicity in ESTS patients. This should ideally lead to a validated normal tissue dose constraint (e.g.: healthy soft tissue segment volume > 3500 cm3) to recommend for practitioners to help reduce the late toxicity risk.
| S-EPMC8213831 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Improved understanding of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) biology has led to better distinction and subtyping of these diseases with the hope of exploiting the molecular characteristics of each subtype to develop appropriately targeted treatment regimens. In the care of patients with extremity STS, adjunctive radiation therapy (RT) is used to facilitate limb and function, preserving surgeries while maintaining five-year local control above 85%. In contrast, for STS originating from nonextremity anatomical sites, the rate of local recurrence is much higher (five-year local control is approximately 50%) and a major cause of death and morbidity in these patients. Incorporating novel technological advancements to administer accurate RT in combination with novel radiosensitizing agents could potentially improve local control and overall survival. RT efficacy in STS can be increased by modulating biological pathways such as angiogenesis, cell cycle regulation, cell survival signaling, and cancer-host immune interactions. Previous experiences, advancements, ongoing research, and current clinical trials combining RT with agents modulating one or more of the above pathways are reviewed. The standard clinical management of patients with STS with pretreatment biopsy, neoadjuvant treatment, and primary surgery provides an opportune disease model for interrogating translational hypotheses. The purpose of this review is to outline a strategic vision for clinical translation of preclinical findings and to identify appropriate targeted agents to combine with radiotherapy in the treatment of STS from different sites and/or different histology subtypes.
| S-EPMC4207861 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSoft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a diverse group of rare malignant tumors. Currently, five to six weeks of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery constitute the mainstay of therapy for localized high-grade sarcomas (G2-G3). Growing evidence suggests that shortening preoperative RT courses by hypofractionation neither increases toxicity rates nor impairs oncological outcomes. Instead, shortening RT courses may improve therapy adherence, raise cost-effectiveness, and provide more treatment opportunities for a wider range of patients. Presumed higher rates of adverse effects and worse outcomes are concerns about hypofractionated RT (HFRT) for STS. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on preoperative HFRT for the treatment of STS and discusses toxicity and oncological outcomes compared to normofractionated RT.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of clinical trials describing outcomes for preoperative HFRT in the management of STS using PubMed, the Cochrane library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Ovid Medline. We followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Trials on retroperitoneal sarcomas, postoperative RT, and hyperthermia were excluded. Articles published until November 30th, 2021, were included.ResultsInitial search yielded 94 articles. After removal of duplicate and ineligible articles, 13 articles qualified for analysis. Eight phase II trials and five retrospective analyses were reviewed. Most trials applied 5 × 5 Gy preoperatively in patients with high-grade STS. HFRT courses did not show increased rates of adverse events compared to historical trials of normofractionated RT. Toxicity rates were mostly comparable or lower than in trials of normofractionated RT. Moreover, HFRT achieved comparable local control rates with shorter duration of therapy. Currently, more than 15 prospective studies on HFRT + / - chemotherapy are ongoing.ConclusionsRetrospective data and phase II trials suggest preoperative HFRT to be a reasonable treatment modality for STS. Oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles were favorable. To date, our knowledge is mostly derived from phase II data. No randomized phase III trial comparing normofractionated and HFRT in STS has been published yet. Multiple ongoing phase II trials applying HFRT to investigate acute and late toxicity will hopefully bring forth valuable findings.
| S-EPMC9472188 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Therapy of soft tissue sarcomas represents an area of significant unmet need in oncology. Angiogenesis has been explored as a potential target both preclinically and clinically, with suggestions of activity. Pazopanib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with prominent antiangiogenic effects. In a Phase II study, pazopanib demonstrated activity in strata enrolling patients with leiomyosarcomas, synovial sarcomas, or other sarcomas but not those enrolling adipocytic sarcomas. PALETTE, the pivotal Phase III trial, demonstrated improved progression-free survival versus placebo in pazopanib-treated patients previously treated for advanced soft tissue sarcomas. No survival benefit was observed, and adipocytic sarcomas were excluded. Health-related quality-of-life assessments indicated significant decrements in several areas affected by pazopanib toxicities, but no global deterioration. Cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that pazopanib therapy may or may not be cost-effective in different geographic settings. Pazopanib provides important proof-of-concept for antiangiogenic therapy in soft tissue sarcomas. Its use can be improved by further biological studies of its activity profile in sarcomas, studies of biological rational combinations, and clinicopathologic/biological correlative studies of activity to allow better drug targeting.
| S-EPMC4907704 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionSelected patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcomas (STBS) may benefit from intensive local treatment, such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). This study aimed to summarize the utilization and outcomes of SRT in STBS and to identify predictive factors for progression and survival.Materials and methodsConsecutive patients with advanced STBS who underwent STBS in a sarcoma tertiary center were identified. We collected tumor- and treatment-related factors. Endpoints comprised time to local progression (TTLP), local progression-free survival (LPFS), time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors.ResultsWe identified 141 patients who underwent 233 SRTs. Median follow-up was 21 months. Local and distant progression occurred after 19 and 163 SRTs, respectively. SRT for lung metastases was predictive for better TTLP and LPFS (hazard ratio, HR = 0.12, p = 0.007 and HR = 0.42, p = 0.002, respectively). Bone sarcoma (HR for TTLP = 3.18, p = 0.043; HR for LPFS = 1.99, p = 0.028) and lower administered dose (HR for TTLP = 0.98, p = 0.007; HR for LPFS = 0.99, p = 0.012) were predictive for worse TTLP and LPFS. SRT for oligometastases (HR = 0.46, p = 0.021) and lung metastases (HR = 0.55, p = 0.046) was predictive for better OS, whereas diagnosis of bone sarcoma (HR = 2.05, p = 0.029) was predictive for worse OS.ConclusionSRT provides excellent local control in STBS patients without significant toxicity. Patients with oligometastatic disease, lung metastases, and soft tissue sarcomas benefit the most from SRT. The dose escalation moderately enhances local control; however, it does not translate into better survival.
| S-EPMC8848098 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues, and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. However, this makes it more important that STS are managed by teams, expert in such cases, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, as well as recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous version published in 2010 (Grimer et al. in Sarcoma 2010:506182, 2010). The original guidelines were drawn up following a consensus meeting of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This current version has been updated and amended with reference to other European and US guidance. There are specific recommendations for the management of selected subtypes of disease including retroperitoneal and uterine sarcomas, as well as aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumours) and other borderline tumours commonly managed by sarcoma services. An important aim in sarcoma management is early diagnosis and prompt referral. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to one of the specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma services, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging, plus a biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon. In tumours at higher risk of recurrence or metastasis pre- or post-operative radiotherapy should be considered. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilized in some cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late-effects of treatment. For local recurrence, and more rarely in selected cases of metastatic disease, surgical resection would be considered. Treatment for metastases may include radiotherapy, or systemic therapy guided by the sarcoma subtype. In some cases, symptom control and palliative care support alone will be appropriate.
| S-EPMC5109663 | biostudies-other
Project description:Background and purposeIn this work, we validate a texture-based model computed from positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). We explore functional imaging at different treatment time points and evaluate the feasibility of radiotherapy dose painting as a potential treatment strategy for patients with higher metastatic risk.Materials and methodsWe acquired fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, fluoromisonidazole (FMISO)-PET, diffusion weighting (DW)-MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI data for 18 patients with extremity STS before, during, and after pre-operative radiotherapy. We tested the lung metastases prediction model using pre-treatment images. We evaluated the feasibility of dose painting using volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) via treatment re-planning with a prescription of 50 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV50Gy) and boost doses of 60 Gy to the FDG hypermetabolic gross tumour volume (GTV60Gy) and 65 Gy to the low-perfusion DCE-MRI hypoxic GTV contained within the GTV60Gy (GTV65Gy).ResultsThe texture-based model for lung metastases prediction reached an area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 0.71, 0.75, 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. Dose painting resulted in adequate coverage and homogeneity in the re-planned treatments: D95% to the PTV50Gy, GTV60Gy and GTV65Gy were 50.0 Gy, 60.3 Gy and 65.4 Gy, respectively.ConclusionsTextural biomarkers extracted from FDG-PET and MRI could be useful to identify STS patients that might benefit from dose escalation. The feasibility of treatment planning with double boost levels to intratumoural GTV functional sub-volumes was established.
| S-EPMC7807871 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Management of marginally resectable or unresectable soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in patients who are not candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to chemoresistant pathology or contraindications remains a challenge. Therefore, in these indications, we aimed to investigate a feasibility of 10x 3.25 Gy radiotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (HT) that could be followed by surgery or 4x 4 Gy radiotherapy with HT. We recruited patients with locally advanced marginally resectable or unresectable STS who (1) presented chemoresistant STS subtype, or (2) progressed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or (3) were unfit for chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of the proposed regimen. Thirty patients were enrolled. All patients received the first part of the treatment, namely radiotherapy with HT. Among them, 14 received the second part of radiotherapy with HT whereas 13 patients underwent surgery. Three patients did not complete the treatment protocol. The feasibility criteria were fulfilled in 90% of patients. Two patients developed distant metastases. One patient died due to distant progression. One patient developed rapid local recurrence after surgery. Hypofractionated radiotherapy with HT is a feasible treatment for marginally resectable or unresectable STS in patients who are not candidates for chemotherapy. Results of this clinical trial support the further validation of RT and HT combinations in STS.
| S-EPMC8000962 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeNumerous preclinical studies have demonstrated that angiogenesis inhibitors can increase the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT). We sought to examine the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab (BV) and RT in soft tissue sarcomas and explore biomarkers to help determine the treatment response.Methods and materialsPatients with ≥5 cm, intermediate- or high-grade soft tissue sarcomas at significant risk of local recurrence received neoadjuvant BV alone followed by BV plus RT before surgical resection. Correlative science studies included analysis of the serial blood and tumor samples and serial perfusion computed tomography scans.ResultsThe 20 patients had a median tumor size of 8.25 cm, with 13 extremity, 1 trunk, and 6 retroperitoneal/pelvis tumors. The neoadjuvant treatment was well tolerated, with only 4 patients having Grade 3 toxicities (hypertension, liver function test elevation). BV plus RT resulted in ≥80% pathologic necrosis in 9 (45%) of 20 tumors, more than double the historical rate seen with RT alone. Three patients had a complete pathologic response. The median microvessel density decreased 53% after BV alone (p <.05). After combination therapy, the median tumor cell proliferation decreased by 73%, apoptosis increased 10.4-fold, and the blood flow, blood volume, and permeability surface area decreased by 62-72% (p <.05). Analysis of gene expression microarrays of untreated tumors identified a 24-gene signature for treatment response. The microvessel density and circulating progenitor cells at baseline and the reduction in microvessel density and plasma soluble c-KIT with BV therapy also correlated with a good pathologic response (p <.05). After a median follow-up of 20 months, only 1 patient had developed local recurrence.ConclusionsThe results from the present exploratory study indicated that BV increases the efficacy of RT against soft tissue sarcomas and might reduce the incidence of local recurrence. Thus, this regimen warrants additional investigation. Gene expression profiles and other tissue and circulating biomarkers showed promising correlations with treatment response.
| S-EPMC3021107 | biostudies-literature