Dataset Information

Revisiting antibody modeling assessment for CDR-H3 loop.

ABSTRACT: The antigen-binding site of antibodies, also known as complementarity-determining region (CDR), has hypervariable sequence properties. In particular, the third CDR loop of the heavy chain, CDR-H3, has such variability in its sequence, length, and conformation that ordinary modeling techniques cannot build a high-quality structure. At Stage 2 of the Second Antibody Modeling Assessment (AMA-II) held in 2013, the model structures of the CDR-H3 loops were submitted by the seven modelers and were critically assessed. After our participation in AMA-II, we rebuilt one of the long CDR-H3 loops with 13 residues (A52 antibody) by a more precise method, using enhanced conformational sampling with the explicit water model, as compared to our previous method employed at AMA-II. The current stable models obtained from the free energy landscape at 300 K include structures similar to the X-ray crystal structures. Those models were not built in our previous work at AMA-II. The current free energy landscape suggested that the CDR-H3 loop structures in the crystal are not stable in solution, but they are stabilized by the crystal packing effect.

SUBMITTER: Nishigami H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5081041 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Revisiting antibody modeling assessment for CDR-H3 loop.

Nishigami Hiroshi H Kamiya Narutoshi N Nakamura Haruki H

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS 20161101 11

The antigen-binding site of antibodies, also known as complementarity-determining region (CDR), has hypervariable sequence properties. In particular, the third CDR loop of the heavy chain, CDR-H3, has such variability in its sequence, length, and conformation that ordinary modeling techniques cannot build a high-quality structure. At Stage 2 of the Second Antibody Modeling Assessment (AMA-II) held in 2013, the model structures of the CDR-H3 loops were submitted by the seven modelers and were cri ...[more]

PMID: 27515703

Similar Datasets

Project description:Antibodies are proteins generated by the adaptive immune system to recognize and counteract a plethora of pathogens through specific binding. This adaptive binding is mediated by structural diversity in the six complementary determining region (CDR) loops (H1, H2, H3, L1, L2 and L3), which also makes accurate structural modeling of CDRs challenging. Both homology and de novo modeling approaches have been used; to date, the former has achieved greater accuracy for the non-H3 loops. The homology modeling of non-H3 CDRs is more accurate because non-H3 CDR loops of the same length and type can be grouped into a few structural clusters. Most antibody-modeling suites utilize homology modeling for the non-H3 CDRs, differing only in the alignment algorithm and how/if they utilize structural clusters. While RosettaAntibody and SAbPred do not explicitly assign query CDR sequences to clusters, two other approaches, PIGS and Kotai Antibody Builder, utilize sequence-based rules to assign CDR sequences to clusters. While the manually curated sequence rules can identify better structural templates, because their curation requires extensive literature search and human effort, they lag behind the deposition of new antibody structures and are infrequently updated. In this study, we propose a machine learning approach (Gradient Boosting Machine [GBM]) to learn the structural clusters of non-H3 CDRs from sequence alone. The GBM method simplifies feature selection and can easily integrate new data, compared to manual sequence rule curation. We compare the classification results using the GBM method to that of RosettaAntibody in a 3-repeat 10-fold cross-validation (CV) scheme on the cluster-annotated antibody database PyIgClassify and we observe an improvement in the classification accuracy of the concerned loops from 84.5% ± 0.24% to 88.16% ± 0.056%. The GBM models reduce the errors in specific cluster membership misclassifications when the involved clusters have relatively abundant data. Based on the factors identified, we suggest methods that can enrich structural classes with sparse data to further improve prediction accuracy in future studies.

Project description:Previous analyses of the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of antibodies have focused on a small number of "canonical" conformations for each loop. This is primarily the result of the work of Chothia and coworkers, most recently in 1997. Because of the widespread utility of antibodies, we have revisited the clustering of conformations of the six CDR loops with the much larger amount of structural information currently available. In this work, we were careful to use a high-quality data set by eliminating low-resolution structures and CDRs with high B-factors or high conformational energies. We used a distance function based on directional statistics and an effective clustering algorithm with affinity propagation. With this data set of over 300 nonredundant antibody structures, we were able to cover 28 CDR-length combinations (e.g., L1 length 11, or "L1-11" in our CDR-length nomenclature) for L1, L2, L3, H1, and H2. The Chothia analysis covered only 20 CDR-lengths. Only four of these had more than one conformational cluster, of which two could easily be distinguished by gene source (mouse/human; κ/λ) and one could easily be distinguished purely by the presence and the positions of Pro residues (L3-9). Thus, using the Chothia analysis does not require the complicated set of "structure-determining residues" that is often assumed. Of our 28 CDR-lengths, 15 have multiple conformational clusters, including 10 for which the Chothia analysis had only one canonical class. We have a total of 72 clusters for non-H3 CDRs; approximately 85% of the non-H3 sequences can be assigned to a conformational cluster based on gene source and/or sequence. We found that earlier predictions of "bulged" versus "nonbulged" conformations based on the presence or the absence of anchor residues Arg/Lys94 and Asp101 of H3 have not held up, since all four combinations lead to a majority of conformations that are bulged. Thus, the earlier analyses have been significantly enhanced by the increased data. We believe that the new classification will lead to improved methods for antibody structure prediction and design.

Dataset Information

Revisiting antibody modeling assessment for CDR-H3 loop.

Publications

Revisiting antibody modeling assessment for CDR-H3 loop.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets