Dataset Information

Exploring the intrinsic differences among breast tumor subtypes defined using immunohistochemistry markers based on the decision tree.

ABSTRACT: Exploring the intrinsic differences among breast cancer subtypes is of crucial importance for precise diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making in diseases of high heterogeneity. The subtypes defined with several layers of information are related but not consistent, especially using immunohistochemistry markers and gene expression profiling. Here, we explored the intrinsic differences among the subtypes defined by the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 based on the decision tree. We identified 30 mRNAs and 7 miRNAs differentially expressed along the tree's branches. The final signature panel contained 30 mRNAs, whose performance was validated using two public datasets based on 3 well-known classifiers. The network and pathway analysis were explored for feature genes, from which key molecules including FOXQ1 and SFRP1 were revealed to be densely connected with other molecules and participate in the validated metabolic pathways. Our study uncovered the differences among the four IHC-defined breast tumor subtypes at the mRNA and miRNA levels, presented a novel signature for breast tumor subtyping, and identified several key molecules potentially driving the heterogeneity of such tumors. The results help us further understand breast tumor heterogeneity, which could be availed in clinics.

SUBMITTER: Li Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5082366 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Exploring the intrinsic differences among breast tumor subtypes defined using immunohistochemistry markers based on the decision tree.

Li Yang Y Tang Xu-Qing XQ Bai Zhonghu Z Dai Xiaofeng X

Scientific reports 20161027

Exploring the intrinsic differences among breast cancer subtypes is of crucial importance for precise diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making in diseases of high heterogeneity. The subtypes defined with several layers of information are related but not consistent, especially using immunohistochemistry markers and gene expression profiling. Here, we explored the intrinsic differences among the subtypes defined by the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor rec ...[more]

PMID: 27786176

Similar Datasets

Project description:The classification of immune subtypes was based on immune signatures highlighting the tumor immuno-microenvironment. It was found that immune subtypes associated with mutation and expression patterns in the tumor. How the intrinsic genetic and transcriptomic alterations contribute to the immune subtypes and how to select drug combinations from both targeted drugs and immune therapeutic drugs according to different immune subtypes are still not clear. Through statistical analysis of genetic alterations and transcriptional profiles of breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) samples, we found significant differences in the number of somatic missense mutations and frameshift deletions among the different immune subtypes. The high mutation load for somatic missense mutations and frameshift deletions may be explained by the high frequency of mutations and high expression of DNA double-strand break repair pathway genes. Extensive analysis of signaling pathways in both the genetic and transcriptomic levels reveals significantly altered pathways such as tumor protein Tumor Protein P53 (TP53) and receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)/RAS signaling pathways among different subtypes. Drug targets in the signaling pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 1 (MAP3K1) and Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PIK3CA) show genetic alteration in specific subtypes, which may be potential targets for patients of a specific subtype. More drug targets which show transcriptional difference among immune subtypes were discovered, such as cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4, CDK6, Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2), etc. Moreover, differences in functional activity between tumor growth and immune-related pathways also elucidate the extrinsic factors of differences in prognosis and suggest potential drug combinations for different immune subtypes. These results help to explain how intrinsic alterations are associated with the immune subtypes and provide clues for possible combination therapy for different immune subtypes.

Project description:BackgroundPostmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. As CRC is a heterogeneous disease, we evaluated whether the association of HT and CRC differs across etiologically relevant, molecularly defined tumor subtypes and tumor location.MethodsWe pooled data on tumor subtypes (microsatellite instability status, CpG island methylator phenotype status, BRAF and KRAS mutations, pathway: adenoma-carcinoma, alternate, serrated), tumor location (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), and HT use among 8220 postmenopausal women (3898 CRC cases and 4322 controls) from 8 observational studies. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of ever vs never HT use with each tumor subtype compared with controls. Models were adjusted for study, age, body mass index, smoking status, and CRC family history. All statistical tests were 2-sided.ResultsAmong postmenopausal women, ever HT use was associated with a 38% reduction in overall CRC risk (OR =0.62, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.69). This association was similar according to microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype and BRAF or KRAS status. However, the association was attenuated for tumors arising through the serrated pathway (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.01) compared with the adenoma-carcinoma pathway (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.73; P het =.04) and alternate pathway (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.72). Additionally, proximal colon tumors had a weaker association (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.80) compared with rectal (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.63) and distal colon (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.66; P het =.01) tumors.ConclusionsWe observed a strong inverse association between HT use and overall CRC risk, which may predominantly reflect a benefit of HT use for tumors arising through the adenoma-carcinoma and alternate pathways as well as distal colon and rectal tumors.

Dataset Information

Exploring the intrinsic differences among breast tumor subtypes defined using immunohistochemistry markers based on the decision tree.

Publications

Exploring the intrinsic differences among breast tumor subtypes defined using immunohistochemistry markers based on the decision tree.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets