Dataset Information

A Systems Biology Comparison of Ovarian Cancers Implicates Putative Somatic Driver Mutations through Protein-Protein Interaction Models.

ABSTRACT: Ovarian carcinomas can be aggressive with a high mortality rate (e.g., high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, or HGSOCs), or indolent with much better long-term outcomes (e.g., low-malignant-potential, or LMP, serous ovarian carcinomas). By comparing LMP and HGSOC tumors, we can gain insight into the mechanisms underlying malignant progression in ovarian cancer. However, previous studies of the two subtypes have been focused on gene expression analysis. Here, we applied a systems biology approach, integrating gene expression profiles derived from two independent data sets containing both LMP and HGSOC tumors with protein-protein interaction data. Genes and related networks implicated by both data sets involved both known and novel disease mechanisms and highlighted the different roles of BRCA1 and CREBBP in the two tumor types. In addition, the incorporation of somatic mutation data revealed that amplification of PAK4 is associated with poor survival in patients with HGSOC. Thus, perturbations in protein interaction networks demonstrate differential trafficking of network information between malignant and benign ovarian cancers. The novel network-based molecular signatures identified here may be used to identify new targets for intervention and to improve the treatment of invasive ovarian cancer as well as early diagnosis.

SUBMITTER: Yang MQ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5082879 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Systems Biology Comparison of Ovarian Cancers Implicates Putative Somatic Driver Mutations through Protein-Protein Interaction Models.

Yang Mary Qu MQ Elnitski Laura L

PloS one 20161027 10

Ovarian carcinomas can be aggressive with a high mortality rate (e.g., high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, or HGSOCs), or indolent with much better long-term outcomes (e.g., low-malignant-potential, or LMP, serous ovarian carcinomas). By comparing LMP and HGSOC tumors, we can gain insight into the mechanisms underlying malignant progression in ovarian cancer. However, previous studies of the two subtypes have been focused on gene expression analysis. Here, we applied a systems biology approach ...[more]

PMID: 27788148

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAmplified centrosomes in cancers are recently garnering a lot of attention as an emerging hub of diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic targets. Ovarian adenocarcinomas commonly harbor supernumerary centrosomes that drive chromosomal instability. A centrosome clustering molecule, KIFC1, is indispensable for the viability of extra centrosome-bearing cancer cells, and may underlie progression of ovarian cancers.MethodsCentrosome amplification in low- and high- grade serous ovarian adenocarcinomas was quantitated employing confocal imaging. KIFC1 expression was analyzed in ovarian tumors using publically-available databases. Associated grade, stage and clinical information from these databases were plotted for KIFC1 gene expression values. Furthermore, interactions and functional annotation of KIFC1 and its highly correlated genes were studied using DAVID and STRING 9.1.ResultsClinical specimens of ovarian cancers display robust centrosome amplification and deploy centrosome clustering to execute an error-prone mitosis to enable karyotypic heterogeneity that fosters tumor progression and aggressiveness. Our in silico analyses showed KIFC1 overexpression in human ovarian tumors (n = 1090) and its upregulation associated with tumor aggressiveness utilizing publically-available gene expression databases. KIFC1 expression correlated with advanced tumor grade and stage. Dichotomization of KIFC1 levels revealed a significantly lower overall survival time for patients in high KIFC1 group. Intriguingly, in a matched-cohort of primary (n = 7) and metastatic (n = 7) ovarian samples, no significant differences in KIFC1 expression were detectable, suggesting that high KIFC1 expression may serve as a marker of metastases onset. Nonetheless, KIFC1 levels in both primary and matched metastatic sites were significantly higher compared to normal tissue . Ingenuity based network prediction algorithms combined with pre-established protein interaction networks uncovered several novel cell-cycle related partner genes on the basis of interconnectivity, illuminating the centrosome clustering independent agenda of KIFC1 in ovarian tumor progression.ConclusionsOvarian cancers display amplified centrosomes, a feature of aggressive tumors. To cope up with the abnormal centrosomal load, ovarian cancer cells upregulate genes like KIFC1 that are known to induce centrosome clustering. Our data underscore KIFC1 as a putative biomarker that predicts worse prognosis, poor overall survival and may serve as a potential marker of onset of metastatic dissemination in ovarian cancer patients.

Project description:BackgroundEvolutionary models of breast cancer progression differ on the extent to which metastatic potential is pre-encoded within primary tumors. Although metastatic recurrences often harbor putative driver mutations that are not detected in their antecedent primary tumor using standard sequencing technologies, whether these mutations were acquired before or after dissemination remains unclear.MethodsTo ascertain whether putative metastatic driver mutations initially deemed specific to the metastasis by whole exome sequencing were, in actuality, present within rare ancestral subclones of the primary tumors from which they arose, we employed error-controlled ultra-deep sequencing (UDS-UMI) coupled with FFPE artifact mitigation by uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) to assess the presence of 132 "metastasis-specific" mutations within antecedent primary tumors from 21 patients. Maximum mutation detection sensitivity was ~1% of primary tumor cells. A conceptual framework was developed to estimate relative likelihoods of alternative models of mutation acquisition.ResultsThe ancestral primary tumor subclone responsible for seeding the metastasis was identified in 29% of patients, implicating several putative drivers in metastatic seeding including LRP5 A65V and PEAK1 K140Q. Despite this, 93% of metastasis-specific mutations in putative metastatic driver genes remained undetected within primary tumors, as did 96% of metastasis-specific mutations in known breast cancer drivers, including ERRB2 V777L, ESR1 D538G, and AKT1 D323H. Strikingly, even in those cases in which the rare ancestral subclone was identified, 87% of metastasis-specific putative driver mutations remained undetected. Modeling indicated that the sequential acquisition of multiple metastasis-specific driver or passenger mutations within the same rare subclonal lineage of the primary tumor was highly improbable.ConclusionsOur results strongly suggest that metastatic driver mutations are sequentially acquired and selected within the same clonal lineage both before, but more commonly after, dissemination from the primary tumor, and that these mutations are biologically consequential. Despite inherent limitations in sampling archival primary tumors, our findings indicate that tumor cells in most patients continue to undergo clinically relevant genomic evolution after their dissemination from the primary tumor. This provides further evidence that metastatic recurrence is a multi-step, mutation-driven process that extends beyond primary tumor dissemination and underscores the importance of longitudinal tumor assessment to help guide clinical decisions.

Dataset Information

A Systems Biology Comparison of Ovarian Cancers Implicates Putative Somatic Driver Mutations through Protein-Protein Interaction Models.

Publications

A Systems Biology Comparison of Ovarian Cancers Implicates Putative Somatic Driver Mutations through Protein-Protein Interaction Models.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets