Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

39 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Lamivudine versus Entecavir for Newly Diagnosed Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background/aims

Antiviral therapy is a key component in the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, whether the potent drug entecavir is more effective than a less potent drug, such as lamivudine, in HBV-related HCC is not clear.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 451 newly diagnosed, HBV-related HCC patients without antiviral therapy at diagnosis, who started antiviral therapy with either entecavir (n=249) or lamivudine (n=202), were enrolled.

Results

The median survival was longer for the entecavir group than for the lamivudine group, and lamivudine use (vs entecavir) was an independent factor for mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; p=0.002). Lamivudine use (vs entecavir) was an independent risk factor for new-onset hepatic decompensation (HR, 1.67; p=0.010) in 318 patients without previous hepatic decompensation, and it was also an independent risk factor for recurrence after curative therapy (HR, 1.84; p=0.002) in 117 patients who received curative therapy. The findings were similar in a propensity score-matched cohort.

Conclusions

Overall survival, decompensation-free survival, and recurrence-free survival were better in the entecavir-treated patients than in the lamivudine treated-patients, indicating that the potent antiviral drug should be the preferred choice in HBV-related HCC patients.

SUBMITTER: Kim JH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5087934 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Safety and efficacy of lamivudine after radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Antiviral treatments for hepatitis B virus (HBV) are not established in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) in patients with HBV-related HCC who were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: RFA-treated patients with HBV-related HCC were retrospectively divided into those who received LAM (LAM group) and those who did not (nontreatment group). The first-year changes in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (TBIL), and albumin (ALB) levels were compared in corresponding subsets based on Child-Pugh classification (Mann-Whitney U test) and between one-to-one matched pairs (Wilcoxon signed rank test), who were selected on the basis of their propensity scores for receiving LAM. Overall and recurrence-free survival was also compared. RESULTS: Complete ablation of HCC was achieved in 104 patients with HBV-related HCC between January 2000 and December 2005. LAM was administered to 33 patients after RFA. Serum HBV-DNA became negative by TMA method in 24 (73%) patients. Four patients showed redetection of HBV-DNA with ALT elevation. Subset analysis based on initial Child-Pugh class and paired analysis with matching revealed significant decreases in ALT and bilirubin levels and increases in ALB levels in the first year in the LAM group (DeltaALT = -17, DeltaALB = +0.3, and DeltaTBIL = -0.2) compared with controls (DeltaALT = +5, DeltaALB = +/-0.0, and DeltaTBIL = +0.3). Overall survival and recurrence-free survival did not differ between the two groups. No specific adverse effect was observed in the LAM group. CONCLUSION: LAM after RFA for HBV-related HCC was safe and improved liver function. Further studies are needed to evaluate its effect on survival.

| S-EPMC2716870 | biostudies-other

Tenofovir versus entecavir on the prognosis of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: a randomised controlled trial.

Project description:BackgroundNucleot(s)ide analog treatment (entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF)) is reported to be associated with decreased tumor recurrence and death in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, yet further work is needed to evaluate the different efficacies of these two agents on the prognosis of early-stage HBV-related HCC patients after curative liver resection.Material and methodsFrom July 2017 to January 2019, 148 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent curative liver resection were randomized to receive TDF ( n =74) or ETV ( n =74) therapy. The primary end point was tumor recurrence in the intention-to-treat population. Overall survival and tumor recurrence of patients were compared by multivariable-adjusted Cox regression and competing risk analyses.ResultsDuring the follow-up with continued antiviral therapy, 37 (25.0%) patients developed tumor recurrence, and 16 (10.8%) patients died ( N =15) or received liver transplantation ( N =1). In the intention-to-treat cohort, the recurrence-free survival for the TDF group was significantly better than that for the ETV group ( P =0.026). In the multivariate analysis, the relative risks of recurrence and death/liver transplantation for ETV therapy were 3.056 (95% CI: 1.015-9.196; P =0.047) and 2.566 (95% CI: 1.264-5.228; P =0.009), respectively. Subgroup analysis of the PP population indicated a better overall survival and RFS of patients receiving TDF therapy ( P =0.048; hazard ratio (HR) =0.362; 95% CI: 0.132-0.993 and P =0.014; HR =0.458; 95% CI: 0.245-0.856). Additionally, TDF therapy was an independent protective factor against late tumor recurrence ( P =0.046; (HR)=0.432; 95% CI: 0.189-0.985) but not against early tumor recurrence ( P =0.109; HR =1.964; 95% CI: 0.858-4.494).ConclusionHBV-related HCC patients treated with consistent TDF therapy had a significantly lower risk of tumor recurrence than those treated with ETV after curative treatment.

| S-EPMC10583900 | biostudies-literature

Entecavir monotherapy versus de novo combination of lamivudine and adefovir for compensated hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis: a real-world prospective multicenter cohort study.

Project description:Background:De novo combination of lamivudine (Lam) and adefovir (Adv) was not rarely used in clinical practice. However, head-to-head comparisons of entecavir (Etv) monotherapy with this combination in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related compensated cirrhosis patients are unavailable. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Etv monotherapy with combination therapy in patients with HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis. Methods:Treatment-naïve patients with HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis were recruited to receive either Etv monotherapy or a de novo combination of Lam and Adv. Data were collected at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Results:A total of 578 patients (485 in Etv group, 93 in combination group) were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. At the end of 1, 2, and 3 years, HBV DNA was undetectable in 82.7%, 96.2%, and 94.3% of patients in the Etv group and 88.9%, 81.7%, and 84.6% in the combination group, respectively (all P>0.05). The cumulative virological breakthrough rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 2.7%, 6.7%, and 9.8% in the Etv group and 2.9%, 13.3%, and 32.2% in the combination group, respectively (P=0.003). After propensity-score adjustment for age, sex, and baseline HBeAg, ALT, and total bilirubin, virological breakthrough was higher in the de novo combination of Lam and Adv (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.37-5.86; P<0.01). The cumulative rate of liver-related events, including decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma, at 1, 2, and 3 years was 2.9%, 4.2%, and 6.1% in the Etv group and 2.2%, 2.2%, and 6.7% in combination group, respectively (P=0.83). Biochemical response and serological response were similar between the groups. Conclusion:Etv treatment had less virological breakthrough and potentially higher HBV-DNA suppression than de novo combination of Lam and Adv during 3 years in treatment-naïve HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis.

| S-EPMC6448536 | biostudies-literature

Effects of viral load on tenofovir vs. entecavir efficacy in recurrence prevention of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10538913 | biostudies-literature

Ultrasensitive Assay for Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen Predicts Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidences During Entecavir.

Project description:Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and surface antigen (HBsAg) are surrogate markers of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA. The measurement range of the current HBcrAg assay is relatively narrow. Thus, we examined the potential of HBcrAg and HBsAg measured by ultrasensitive assays for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with entecavir (ETV). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 180 patients who received ETV for >1 year. All patients had hepatitis B e-antigen negativity at baseline. Serum HBcrAg and HBsAg levels at baseline and year 1 were measured in all patients by ultrasensitive assays using immunoassay for total antigen including complex by pretreatment (iTACT) technology. During the median follow-up of 11.0 years, 22 patients developed HCC (11.8/1,000 person-years). Baseline HBsAg levels were not associated with HCC development during ETV treatment. However, high HBcrAg levels at baseline and at year 1 were significantly associated with HCC development (log-rank test; P < 0.001). In 110 patients (61.1%) with ≥4.0 log U/mL at baseline (high HBcrAg cohort), HBcrAg declined to ≤2.9 log U/mL at year 1 in 25 patients (22.7%). The adjusted hazard ratio for HCC incidence was significantly lower in patients with HBcrAg ≤2.9 log U/mL at year 1 than in those in the high HBcrAg cohort. Conclusion: Measurement of HBcrAg by ultrasensitive assay has better potential for predicting HCC during antiviral treatment than the current HBcrAg assay.

| S-EPMC8710789 | biostudies-literature

Efficacies of entecavir against lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus replication and recombinant polymerases in vitro.

Project description:Entecavir (ETV) is a potent and selective inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication in vitro and in vivo that is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of chronic HBV infections. A major limitation of the current HBV antiviral therapy, lamivudine (3TC), is the emergence of drug-resistant HBV in a majority of treated patients due to specific mutations in the nucleotide binding site of HBV DNA polymerase (HBV Pol). To determine the effects of 3TC resistance mutations on inhibition by ETV triphosphate (ETV-TP), a series of in vitro studies were performed. The inhibition of wild-type and 3TC-resistant HBV Pol by ETV-TP was measured using recombinant HBV nucleocapsids, and compared to that of 3TC-TP. These enzyme inhibition studies demonstrated that ETV-TP is a highly potent inhibitor of wild-type HBV Pol and is 100- to 300-fold more potent than 3TC-TP against 3TC-resistant HBV Pol. Cell culture assays were used to gauge the potential for antiviral cross-resistance of 3TC-resistant mutants to ETV. Results demonstrated that ETV inhibited the replication of 3TC-resistant HBV, but 20- to 30-fold higher concentrations were required. To gain further perspective regarding the potential therapeutic use of ETV, its phosphorylation was examined in hepatoma cells treated with extracellular concentrations representative of drug levels in plasma in ETV-treated patients. At these concentrations, intracellular ETV-TP accumulated to levels expected to inhibit the enzyme activity of both wild-type and 3TC-resistant HBV Pol. These findings are predictive of potent antiviral activity of ETV against both wild-type and 3TC-resistant HBV.

| S-EPMC127388 | biostudies-literature

Autophagy and microRNA in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Project description:Approximately 350 million people worldwide are chronically infected by hepatitis B virus (HBV). HBV causes severe liver diseases including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In about 25% of affected patients, HBV infection proceeds to HCC. Therefore, the mechanisms by which HBV affects the host cell to promote viral replication and its pathogenesis have been the subject of intensive research efforts. Emerging evidence indicates that both autophagy and microRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in HBV replication and HBV-related hepatocarcinogenesis. In this review, we summarize how HBV induces autophagy, the role of autophagy in HBV infection, and HBV-related tumorigenesis. We further discuss the emerging roles of miRNAs in HBV infection and how HBV affects miRNAs biogenesis. The accumulating knowledge pertaining to autophagy and miRNAs in HBV replication and its pathogenesis may lead to the development of novel strategies against HBV infection and HBV-related HCC tumorigenesis.

| S-EPMC4698484 | biostudies-other

Entecavir versus Tenofovir for the Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Treatment-naive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in Korea.

Project description:BackgroundThe occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major concern during antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B. There are conflicting opinions regarding the effects of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) on HCC prevention. We assessed these two antiviral medications for preventing HCC in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using nationwide claims data from the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. We included 55,473 treatment-naïve adult cases where ETV or TDF treatment was started between 2013 and 2017 (cohort 1). The ETV and TDF groups were matched 1:2 based on age, sex, comorbidities, hospital type, and index date year. Patients were followed up until December 2018. The outcome was the development of HCC. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to sex, age, hospital type and the presence of cirrhosis. We also compared the outcomes of patients who had started antiviral therapy during the 2012-2014 period (cohort 2).ResultsThe matched participants (18,491 in the ETV and 36,982 in the TDF groups) were a part of the study for, on average, 41.2 months. The incidence of HCC did not differ significantly between the ETV (1.46 per 100 patient-years) and the TDF (1.36 per 100 patient-years) treatments (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.01; P = 0.081). By contrast, HCC incidence was significantly higher in the ETV group than tenofovir group of cohort 2.ConclusionIn patients with chronic hepatitis B, the ETV treatment did not result in a higher rate of HCC than the TDF treatment.

| S-EPMC8042481 | biostudies-literature

Efficacy of adefovir-based combination therapy for patients with Lamivudine- and entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

Project description:Treatment strategies for entecavir (ETV)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients are not yet well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall antiviral efficacy and to compare the efficacy of combination therapy with adefovir (ADV) plus nucleoside analogues (lamivudine [LAM], telbivudine [LdT], or ETV) in patients infected with LAM- and ETV-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) variants. Virologic, biochemical, and serologic responses during combination therapy with ADV plus nucleoside analogues were assessed. Propensity score analysis was used to select a matched group of patients for the comparison of rescue therapy regimens. A total of 67 consecutive patients were analyzed. Complete virologic suppression was achieved in 27 patients. The overall cumulative incidence of complete virologic suppression at month 24 was 47.4%: 44.3% in the LAM or LdT plus ADV group and 51.4% in the group given ETV and ADV. There was no significant difference between these two groups (P = 0.234). The cumulative incidences of complete virologic suppression were still comparable between the two groups selected and matched using the propensity score model (P = 0.419). Virologic breakthrough was observed in 9 patients, and rtA181V substitution was newly detected in one patient. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negativity and lower baseline HBV DNA level were associated with complete virologic suppression in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, lower baseline HBV DNA level remained an independent predictor. In conclusion, combination therapy with ADV plus nucleoside analogues fails to show sufficient antiviral efficacy in CHB patients with resistance to both LAM and ETV. Further study is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of a more potent tenofovir-based regimen in such patients.

| S-EPMC3837850 | biostudies-literature

Alcohol-dysregulated microRNAs in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Project description:Alcohol consumption and chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are two well-established risk factors for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, there remains a limited understanding of the molecular pathway behind the pathogenesis and progression behind HCC, and how alcohol promotes carcinogenesis in the context of HBV+ HCC. Using next-generation sequencing data from 130 HCC patients and 50 normal liver tissues, we identified a panel of microRNAs that are significantly dysregulated by alcohol consumption in HBV+ patients. In particular, two microRNAs, miR-944 and miR-223-3p, showed remarkable correlation with clinical indication and genomic alterations. We confirmed the dysregulation of these two microRNAs in liver cell lines treated by alcohol and acetaldehyde, and showed that manipulation of miR-223-3p and miR-944 expression induces significant changes in cellular proliferation, sensitivity to doxorubicin, and the expression of both direct-binding and downstream mRNA targets. Together, the results of this study suggest that alcohol consumption in HBV+ HCCs regulates microRNAs that likely play previously uncharacterized roles in the alcohol-associated carcinogenesis of HCC, and future studies of these microRNAs may be valuable for furthering the understanding and treatment of alcohol and HBV-associated HCC.

| S-EPMC5451132 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data