Dataset Information

The importance of mindfulness in psychosocial distress and quality of life in dermatology patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Mindfulness, defined as purposively and nonjudgementally paying attention in the present moment, could be used within psychosocial interventions to reduce the distress associated with social anxiety and avoidance found in many skin conditions. However, little is known about the relationship between naturally occurring levels of mindfulness and distress in dermatology patients.

Objectives

To examine the relationship between mindfulness and psychosocial distress in a dermatological population. It was hypothesized that higher levels of mindfulness would be associated with lower levels of social anxiety, anxiety, depression and skin shame, and with better quality of life.

Methods

Adult dermatology outpatients (n = 120) from one hospital completed items assessing subjective severity, skin shame, fear of negative evaluation, anxiety and depression, quality of life, and levels of mindfulness.

Results

Considering depression, 14% reported mild, 5% moderate and 2·5% severe symptoms. For anxiety, 22% reported mild, 23% moderate and 6% severe symptoms. In addition, 33·4% reported clinically significant social anxiety. After controlling for subjective severity, mindfulness explained an additional 19% of the variance in depression, 39% in anxiety, 41% in social anxiety, 13% in skin shame and 6% in dermatological quality of life. One specific facet of mindfulness (acting with awareness) was found to be the most consistent predictor of distress.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that higher levels of mindfulness are associated with lower distress. This suggests that facilitating mindfulness may be helpful in reducing distress in dermatology patients, and the use of mindfulness techniques warrants further investigation.

SUBMITTER: Montgomery K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5091630 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The importance of mindfulness in psychosocial distress and quality of life in dermatology patients.

Montgomery K K Norman P P Messenger A G AG Thompson A R AR

The British journal of dermatology 20160918 5

<h4>Background</h4>Mindfulness, defined as purposively and nonjudgementally paying attention in the present moment, could be used within psychosocial interventions to reduce the distress associated with social anxiety and avoidance found in many skin conditions. However, little is known about the relationship between naturally occurring levels of mindfulness and distress in dermatology patients.<h4>Objectives</h4>To examine the relationship between mindfulness and psychosocial distress in a derm ...[more]

PMID: 27169607

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundChronic spontaneous/idiopathic urticaria (CSU/CIU) has substantial detrimental effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with an effect comparable to or worse than many other skin diseases.ObjectiveTo assess the effect of omalizumab on CSU patients' HRQoL, measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in three phase III studies ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II and GLACIAL.MethodsA post hoc analysis examined changes in DLQI scores, distribution of patients across DLQI bands and the proportion reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following omalizumab vs. placebo.ResultsOmalizumab 300 mg significantly improved total DLQI scores vs. placebo, with a mean decrease from baseline to week 12 of -10.3 vs. -6.1 (P < 0.0001) in ASTERIA I, -10.2 vs. -6.1 (P = 0.0004) in ASTERIA II and -9.7 vs. -5.1 (P < 0.0001) in GLACIAL. A significant shift from high disease impact on life at baseline towards less impact at week 12 was seen with omalizumab 300 mg vs. placebo (P < 0.001; all studies). The proportion of patients where change in mean total DLQI score from baseline to week 12 reached an MCID of ≥4 was 74.1%, 76.0% and 77.2% in ASTERIA I, II and GLACIAL, respectively (P < 0.01; all studies).LimitationsMaximum duration of omalizumab treatment was 24 weeks.ConclusionThis additional analysis assessed the impact of CSU and benefit of treatment with omalizumab by exploring different facets of DLQI data by treatment arm at multiple assessment points. The original aspects of analysis included applying the concept of the recently validated score for the MCID of the DLQI, changes in DLQI domain scores and in the distribution of subjects based on validated total DLQI score bands. It showed consistently that omalizumab provides significant and clinically relevant improvements in many aspects of HRQoL that are important to patients with CSU. These results contribute to a better understanding of the impact of CSU and its treatment on patients and can support clinical decision-making in routine medical practice.

Project description:BackgroundDermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores are used in many countries as access and reimbursement criteria for costly dermatological treatments. In this study we examined how time trade-off (TTO) utility valuations made by individuals from the general population are related to combinations of DLQI severity levels characterizing dermatologically relevant health states, with the ultimate purpose of developing a value set for the DLQI.MethodsWe used data from an online cross-sectional survey conducted in Hungary in 2020 (n = 842 after sample exclusions). Respondents were assigned to one of 18 random blocks and were asked to provide 10-year TTO valuations for the corresponding five hypothetical health states. To analyze the relationship between DLQI severity levels and utility valuations, we estimated linear, censored, ordinal, and beta regression models, complemented by two-part scalable models accommodating heterogeneity effects in respondents' valuation scale usage. Successive severity levels (0-3) of each DLQI item were represented by dummy variables. We used cross-validation methods to reduce the initial set of 30 dummy variables and improve model robustness.ResultsOur final, censored linear regression model with 13 dummy variables had R2 = 0.136, thus accounting for 36.9% of the incremental explanatory power of a maximal (full-information) benchmark model (R2 = 0.148) over the uni-dimensional model (R2 = 0.129). Each DLQI item was found to have a negative effect on the valuation of health states, yet this effect was largely heterogeneous across DLQI items, and the relative contribution of distinctive severity levels also varied substantially. Overall, we found that the social/interpersonal consequences of skin conditions (in the areas of social and leisure activities, work and school, close personal relationships, and sexuality) had roughly twice as large disutility impact as the physical/practical aspects.ConclusionsWe have developed an experimental value set for the DLQI, which could prospectively be used for quantifying the quality-adjusted life years impact of dermatological treatments and serve as a basis for cost-effectiveness analyses. We suggest that, after validation of our main results through confirmatory studies, population-specific DLQI value sets could be developed and used for conducting cost-effectiveness analyses and developing financing guidelines in dermatological care.

Dataset Information

The importance of mindfulness in psychosocial distress and quality of life in dermatology patients.

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The importance of mindfulness in psychosocial distress and quality of life in dermatology patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets