Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Investigating the Evolution of Ingroup Favoritism Using a Minimal Group Interaction Paradigm: The Effects of Inter- and Intragroup Interdependence.


ABSTRACT: We investigated the effect of structural interdependencies between groups (especially inequality), and interdependencies between individuals on ingroup favoritism in minimal group situations. Previous research has attempted to determine whether ingroup favoritism is produced by categorization or intragroup interdependencies (reciprocation expectations), but recent literature suggests that it is not possible to tease these influences apart. We report two studies that investigate how ingroup favoritism evolves over time in social interaction. The levels of ingroup favoritism were affected by categorization and inequality, and the level of ingroup favoritism changed over time, increasing or decreasing depending on the nature of the initial intergroup structure. We conclude by providing two explanations for this change: emergent norms, and changes to the intergroup situation produced by interaction. Our experiments confirm the value of studying the evolution of minimal group behavior, especially for explaining why low status groups act to preserve intergroup inequalities.

SUBMITTER: Durrheim K 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5113042 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Investigating the Evolution of Ingroup Favoritism Using a Minimal Group Interaction Paradigm: The Effects of Inter- and Intragroup Interdependence.

Durrheim Kevin K   Quayle Michael M   Tredoux Colin G CG   Titlestad Kim K   Tooke Larry L  

PloS one 20161116 11


We investigated the effect of structural interdependencies between groups (especially inequality), and interdependencies between individuals on ingroup favoritism in minimal group situations. Previous research has attempted to determine whether ingroup favoritism is produced by categorization or intragroup interdependencies (reciprocation expectations), but recent literature suggests that it is not possible to tease these influences apart. We report two studies that investigate how ingroup favor  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6265441 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4411968 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8649818 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8511311 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3380441 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8361166 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5031712 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8423920 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7755273 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7064197 | biostudies-literature