Dataset Information

Survival Comparison Between Endoscopic and Surgical Management for Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Matched Propensity Score Analysis Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Data.

ABSTRACT: To determine survival differences among patients receiving endoscopic vs surgical management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data, patients diagnosed with nonmuscle-invasive, low-grade UTUC as their first cancer diagnosis between 2004 and 2009 were identified. Receipts of endoscopic and surgical interventions were assessed, and patients were separated into surgical or endoscopic management cohorts. Two-to-one propensity score analysis was performed to control for baseline characteristics between groups.The endoscopic management (n?=?151) and matched surgical management (n?=?302) groups demonstrated no significant differences in age, gender, race, marital status, Charlson comorbidity index, or year of diagnosis. Endoscopic management was an independent and significant predictor of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio 1.6 for overall survival [OS], hazard ratio 2.1 for cancer-specific survival [CSS]). Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was significantly lower for endoscopic management, with both OS and CSS curves diverging at approximately 24-36 months. A subset of patients initially receiving endoscopic management went on to receive surgical intervention (80/151?=?53%) at a median of 8.8 months from diagnosis. For these patients, Kaplan-Meier-estimated CSS was not significantly different from those who continued with only endoscopic management, and remained significantly lower than patients who received upfront surgery.Although initial survival outcomes (first 24 months) are similar for endoscopic and surgical management of nonmuscle-invasive, low-grade UTUC, both CSS and OS are significantly inferior for the endoscopic management group in the longer term. Furthermore, transition from initial endoscopic management to surgical intervention appears to have limited impact on survival.

SUBMITTER: Vemana G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5115634 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Survival Comparison Between Endoscopic and Surgical Management for Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Matched Propensity Score Analysis Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Data.

Vemana Goutham G Kim Eric H EH Bhayani Sam B SB Vetter Joel M JM Strope Seth A SA

Urology 20160524

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine survival differences among patients receiving endoscopic vs surgical management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data, patients diagnosed with nonmuscle-invasive, low-grade UTUC as their first cancer diagnosis between 2004 and 2009 were identified. Receipts of endoscopic and surgical interventions were assessed, and patients were separated into surgical or endoscopic ...[more]

PMID: 27233931

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components are associated with increased risks of several cancers. However, the relationship between MetS and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has never been investigated before.MethodsWe identified 3,785 UTUC cases aged over 65 years old within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database between 2007 and 2016. For comparison, non-cancer controls (n = 189,953) were selected from the 5% random sample of individuals residing within regions of SEER registries and matched with cases through diagnosis date and pseudo-diagnosis date. MetS and its components were all defined by using ICD-9-CM codes. Multivariate logistic regression models were conducted to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Time trends for MetS and its components were reported and we also performed dose-response effect analysis to test the concomitant effect of these components. The study was presented following the STROBE reporting checklist.ResultsUTUC risk was associated with metabolic syndrome (NCEP-III: OR: 1.669, 95% CI: 1.550-1.792; IDF: OR: 1.924, 95% CI: 1.676-2.172) and its component factors: elevated waist circumference/central adiposity (OR: 1.872, 95% CI: 1.693-2.055), impaired fasting glucose (OR: 1.306, 95% CI: 1.133-1.480), high blood pressure (OR: 1.295, 95% CI: 1.239-1.353), high triglycerides (OR: 1.280, 95% CI: 1.222-1.341), and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR: 1.354, 95% CI: 1.118-1.592). Consistent associations could also be observed in the subgroup analyses by tumor stages, grades, and tumor size. Additionally, the rates of MetS increased over time in both UTUC and control cohort (NCEP-III criterion; EAPC: +18.1%, P <0.001; EAPC: +16.1%, P <0.001, respectively). A significantly gradual increase in UTUC rates could be seen as the No. of the MetS components increase (χ² = 37.239, P trend = 0.000).ConclusionsAmong people aged over 65, MetS and its components were significant risk factors for UTUC with consistent associations in different tumor stages, grades, and tumor size. Even if a subject who did not meet the criteria for MetS had only one of the components, he (she) still had an elevated risk for UTUC. Strategies to control the epidemic of MetS and its components might contribute to a reduction in the UTUC burden. The findings should be considered tentative until ascertained by more researches.

Dataset Information

Survival Comparison Between Endoscopic and Surgical Management for Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Matched Propensity Score Analysis Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Data.

Publications

Survival Comparison Between Endoscopic and Surgical Management for Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Matched Propensity Score Analysis Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets