Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The Association between VDR Gene Polymorphisms and Diabetic Retinopathy Susceptibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.


ABSTRACT: Aims. Studies on the associations of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms with diabetic retinopathy (DR) susceptibility reported conflicting results. A systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to clarify this topic. Methods. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI) was carried out until March 31, 2016. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the strength of the association. Results. A total of 7 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis (649 cases and 707 controls). Pooled ORs showed a significant association between FokI polymorphism and DR risk in all the four genetic models (OR = 1.612 (1.354~1.921), 1.988 (1.481~2.668), 1.889 (1.424~2.505), and 2.674 (1.493~4.790) in allelic, dominant, recessive, and additive models, resp., PZ < 0.01), but not for TaqI or BsmI polymorphism (PZ > 0.05). Similar results were found in the subgroup analysis. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were relatively stable and reliable. Results of Begg's and Egger's tests suggested a lack of publication bias. Conclusions. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that DR was significantly associated with VDR gene FokI polymorphism. However, due to the relatively small sample size in this meta-analysis, further studies with a larger sample size should be done to confirm the findings.

SUBMITTER: Zhang Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5116338 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The Association between VDR Gene Polymorphisms and Diabetic Retinopathy Susceptibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhang Yun Y   Xia Wei W   Lu Ping P   Yuan Huijuan H  

BioMed research international 20161106


<i>Aims</i>. Studies on the associations of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms with diabetic retinopathy (DR) susceptibility reported conflicting results. A systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to clarify this topic. <i>Methods</i>. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI) was carried out until March 31, 2016. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the strength of the association. <i>Results</i>. A total of 7 stud  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8278198 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7805525 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7820190 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3991174 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6071377 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8007918 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9258646 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3869859 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10143592 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5575903 | biostudies-other