Dataset Information

Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Airway Reactivity in Asthma. A Randomized, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Rationale

Studies have demonstrated that application of stress suppresses airway smooth muscle contractility. In animal models of asthma, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduced airway reactivity. Short-term studies of CPAP in patients with asthma showed reductions in airway reactivity.

Objectives

To evaluate whether nocturnal CPAP decreased the provocative concentration of methacholine to reduce FEV₁ by 20% (PC₂₀).

Methods

One hundred ninety-four individuals with asthma were randomized (1:1:1) to use CPAP with warmed, filtered, humidified air at night at pressures either less than 1 cm H₂O (sham) or at 5 cm H₂O or 10 cm H₂O. The primary outcome was change in PC₂₀ after 12 weeks.

Measurements and main results

Adherence to CPAP was low in all groups. Regardless, all groups had a significant improvement in PC₂₀, with 12 weeks/baseline PC₂₀ ratios of 2.12, 1.73, and 1.78 for the sham, 5 cm H₂O, and 10 cm H₂O groups, respectively, and no significant differences between the active and sham groups. Changes in FEV₁ and exhaled nitric oxide were minimal in all groups. The sham group had larger improvements in most patient-reported outcomes measuring asthma symptoms and quality of life, as well as sinus symptoms, than the 5 cm H₂O group. The 10 cm H₂O group showed similar but less consistent improvements in scores, which were not different from improvements in the sham group.

Conclusions

Adherence to nocturnal CPAP was low. There was no evidence to support positive pressure as being effective for reducing airway reactivity in people with well-controlled asthma. Regardless, airway reactivity was improved in all groups, which may represent an effect of participating in a study and/or an effect of warm, humid, filtered air on airway reactivity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01629823).

SUBMITTER: Holbrook JT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5122477 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To assess whether premedication with eszopiclone would improve sleep duration and continuity during polysomnography, thereby improving the quality of diagnostic and CPAP titration studies.Prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trialAcademic, multidisciplinary sleep center.226 adult subjects undergoing polysomnography for suspected sleep disordered breathing; 113 received eszopiclone and 113 received placebo.Subjects received eszopiclone 3 mg or matching placebo before polysomnography. We compared sleep latency, efficiency, total sleep time, and apnea-hypopnea index between these groups. We also compared rates of inadequate studies, defined as insufficient sleep time (< 120 min or sleep efficiency < or = 70%) or incomplete CPAP titrations (> or = 5 events/h on the highest CPAP or complete intolerance).Eszopiclone premedication significantly improved a number of measured variables. Eszopiclone reduced sleep latency (21.7 +/- 27.1 vs. 32.6 +/- 38.2 min, P = 0.014), improved sleep efficiency (87.6% +/- 10.8% vs. 78.1% +/- 15.6%, P < 0.001), reduced wake after sleep onset (39.2 +/- 31.9 vs. 64.5 +/- 45.4 min, P <0.001) and prolonged sleep time (346.5 +/- 53.1 vs. 312.2 +/- 64.2 min, P < 0.001). Sleep efficiencies < or = 70% were more common with placebo than medication (21.2% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.004). Eszopiclone facilitated improved CPAP titrations with fewer residual events (5.7 +/- 10.3 vs. 11.9 +/- 19.6, P = 0.02) and fewer incomplete titrations (31.1% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.04). Poor quality studies (46.0% vs. 26.5%, P = 0.004) were more common with placebo than with eszopiclone. There was a trend for more non-usable studies with placebo (7.1% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.22). Side effects were uncommon and did not differ between groups.Pretreatment with eszopiclone improves the quality of polysomnography and CPAP titration and decreases the need to repeat studies. Given the ever-growing demand for polysomnography and the need to improve efficiency, the routine use of nonbenzodiazepines as premedication for polysomnography should be considered.