Dataset Information

A Review of the Key Clinical Trials of 2015: Results and Implications.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Multiple significant, potentially practice changing clinical trials in cardiology have been conducted and subsequently presented throughout the past year.

Methods

In this paper, the authors have reviewed and contextualized significant cardiovascular clinical trials presented at major international conferences of 2015 including American College of Cardiology, European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, American Diabetes Association, European Society of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Heart Rhythm Congress, and the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.

Results

The authors describe new trial data for heart failure (including eplerenone, finerenone, patiromer, sacubitril/valsartan, the beta 3 agonist mirabegron, sitagliptin, empagliflozin, alginate-hydrogel LV epicardial implant), anticoagulation (idarucizumab and andexanet alfa reversal agents, adherence programmes, practice in ablation), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (long-term data, valve-in-valve use, the TriGuard embolic deflecting device), patent foramen ovale closure, cardiovascular prevention (PCSK9 inhibitors, hypertension treatment) and antiplatelets strategies (extended duration therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor). Trial data are also described for contemporary technologies including the Biofreedom polymer-free drug coated stent, bioabsorbable stents, PCI strategies, left main treatment, atrial fibrillation ablation techniques, leadless pacemakers and the role of coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Conclusions

This paper summarizes and contextualizes multiple pertinent 2015 clinical trials and will be of interest to both clinicians and cardiology researchers.

SUBMITTER: McCune C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5125106 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionOver the last year, multiple, potentially practice-changing, cardiology trials or studies have been published or presented at international meetings including the American College of Cardiology, European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, European Society of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Heart Failure Congress, Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Failure Society of America, American Society of Hypertension and the American Heart Association.MethodsClinical trial results presented at major cardiology conferences during 2014 were reviewed by the authors. Search terms included heart failure (HF), acute coronary syndrome, stable coronary disease, interventional cardiology, atrial fibrillation, electrophysiology and coronary prevention. Selection criteria were trials of broad relevance to the cardiology community, those with potential to change current practice and those with potential to guide further phase III research.ResultsIn this paper, the authors describe and place in clinical context, new HF, data including neprilysin inhibitors, intravenous ferric carboxymaltose, potassium-absorbing compounds, quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy and intraventricular device intervention. New trial data are also described for acute coronary syndromes (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor), stable coronary artery disease (ivabradine), percutaneous coronary intervention (the role of thrombectomy or treatment of non-culprit lesions during primary intervention, pressure wire studies and outcomes of new stent designs), transcatheter aortic valve intervention data, atrial fibrillation (anticoagulation and direct current cardioversion), electrophysiology (leadless pacemaker devices, use of quinidine in Brugada syndrome) and coronary prevention (landmark Ezetimibe outcome data, PCSK9 clinical trials, childhood prevalence of hypertension, renal denervation for resistant hypertension and the role of cardiac computerized tomography in cardiovascular screening).ConclusionThis paper summarizes key clinical trials during 2014 and should be of practical interest to clinicians and cardiology researchers.

Project description:BackgroundIn October 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration released a draft guidance for the development of drugs for the acute treatment of migraine. This guidance offered the option of replacing the previously required 4 co-primary endpoints: pain freedom, freedom from nausea, freedom from photophobia, and freedom from phonophobia, all at 2 hours posttreatment, with 2 co-primary endpoints: pain freedom and freedom from most bothersome symptom (MBS) other than pain, both at 2 hours posttreatment. At the time the new draft guidance was released, no large clinical trials had been undertaken with these 2 co-primary endpoints, posing a challenge in determining the sample size that might be required to achieve statistical significance. As a number of trials have now been completed, we conducted a review of the observed placebo responses, drug effect sizes, and sample sizes to better inform the design of future trials.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library for primary publications of phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind acute migraine treatment trials that used pain freedom and MBS freedom as primary or planned secondary endpoints. For each endpoint, placebo response rates were determined and used to generate estimates of sample size, assuming differences between placebo and active treatment groups of 10%, 15%, and 20%. Sample size calculations were based on 80% power using a 2-group continuity corrected chi-square test with a 5% 2-sided significance level.ResultsWe identified abstracts or full-length papers describing results of 8 clinical trials employing the new co-primary endpoints. The mean placebo response rate for 2-hour pain freedom was 16.75% (range 11.8-21.3%) and treatment effect (difference in response rates between active and placebo groups) ranged from 5.0% to 27.2%. For 2-hour MBS freedom, the mean placebo response rate was 32.8% (range 25.2-48.1%), and the range of treatment effect was 8.9% to 25.4%. Based on a placebo response rate of 17% for pain freedom, the sample sizes that would have been required to achieve statistical significance were n = 269, n = 128, and n = 77, for treatment effect sizes of 10%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. For MBS, assuming a placebo response rate of 33%, the corresponding required sample sizes would have been n = 389, n = 181, and n = 105.ConclusionsThe observed range of placebo response and treatment effect sizes suggests that use of the newly recommended 2 co-primary endpoints could reduce the sample sizes required to achieve significance compared with past trials using 4 primary endpoints (in which mean and median group sizes for recent trials were 375 and 362, respectively). However, the initial trials using the newly recommended co-primary endpoints tended to treat more participants than would have been minimally required. We anticipate that with the growing body of information regarding the use of these new endpoints, samples sizes may be more aligned with treatment efficacy, enabling faster and more cost-effective trials for acute migraine treatment.

Project description:Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare, and potentially life-threatening inflammatory disease, characterized by the rapid and widespread eruption of small, sterile pustules with surrounding skin erythema. Abnormal signaling of the interleukin-36 (IL-36) pathway appears to have a central role in GPP immunopathology, and provides a rational therapeutic target. Spesolimab is a first-in-class humanized monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the IL-36 receptor, and antagonizes IL-36 signaling. Spesolimab obtained regulatory approval in the United States (US) in September 2022 for use in the treatment of GPP flares in adults, and was subsequently approved for GPP flare treatment in many other countries across the world. Recently, regulatory approval was granted for subcutaneous dosing of spesolimab for treatment of GPP when not experiencing a flare. Here, we review data from two key clinical trials that supported the initial US regulatory approval; namely, the phase 1 proof-of-concept trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02978690), and Effisayil™ 1 (NCT03782792), which remains the largest and only randomized clinical trial in patients experiencing GPP flares published to date. In the phase 1 proof-of-concept trial, a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin) was attained in 5/7 (71%) patients by week 1 and in all 7 patients by week 4; and the mean percent improvement in the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) score from baseline was 59.0% at week 1, 73.2% at week 2, and 79.8% at week 4. In Effisayil™ 1, a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 (no visible pustules) was achieved in 19/35 (54%) patients receiving spesolimab at the end of week 1, versus 1/18 (6%) receiving placebo (difference, 49 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21 to 67; P<0.001); and a GPPGA total score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 15/35 (43%) patients in the spesolimab group, versus 2/18 (11%) patients in the placebo group (difference, 32 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 53; P = 0.02). Infections at week 1 were reported in 6/35 (17%) patients receiving spesolimab and in 1/18 (6%) patients receiving placebo. These data demonstrate the efficacy and safety of spesolimab in providing rapid and sustained clinical improvement for patients with GPP flares, which translates into improved quality of life, by offering a targeted therapy for GPP.