Dataset Information

Long-term survival, valve durability, and reoperation for 4 aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement.

ABSTRACT: To evaluate long-term results of aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement for aneurysms, using 4 surgical strategies.From January 1995 to January 2011, 957 patients underwent 1 of 4 aortic root procedures: valve preservation (remodeling or modified reimplantation, n = 261); composite biologic graft (n = 297); composite mechanical graft (n = 156); or allograft root (n = 243).Seven deaths occurred (0.73%), none after valve-preserving procedures, and 13 strokes (1.4%). Composite grafts exhibited higher gradients than allografts or valve preservation, but the latter 2 exhibited more aortic regurgitation (2.7% biologic and 0% mechanical composite grafts vs 24% valve-preserving and 19% allografts at 10 years). Within 2 to 5 years, valve preservation exhibited the least left ventricular hypertrophy, allograft replacement the greatest; however, valve preservation had the highest early risk of reoperation, allograft replacement the lowest. Patients receiving allografts had the highest risk of late reoperation (P < .05), and those receiving composite mechanical grafts and valve preservation had the lowest. Composite bioprosthesis patients had the highest risk of late death (57% at 15 years vs 14%-26% for the remaining procedures, P < .0001), because they were substantially older and had more comorbidities (P < .0001).These 4 aortic root procedures, combined with ascending aorta replacement, provide excellent survival and good durability. Valve-preserving and allograft procedures have the lowest gradients and best ventricular remodeling, but they have more late regurgitation, and likely, less risk of valve-related complications, such as bleeding, hemorrhage, and endocarditis. Despite the early risk of reoperation, we recommend valve-preserving procedures for young patients when possible. Composite bioprostheses are preferable for the elderly.

SUBMITTER: Svensson LG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5125725 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Long-term survival, valve durability, and reoperation for 4 aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement.

Svensson Lars G LG Pillai Saila T ST Rajeswaran Jeevanantham J Desai Milind Y MY Griffin Brian B Grimm Richard R Hammer Donald F DF Thamilarasan Maran M Roselli Eric E EE Pettersson Gösta B GB Gillinov A Marc AM Navia Jose L JL Smedira Nicholas G NG Sabik Joseph F JF Lytle Bruce W BW Blackstone Eugene H EH

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 20151110 3

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate long-term results of aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement for aneurysms, using 4 surgical strategies.<h4>Methods</h4>From January 1995 to January 2011, 957 patients underwent 1 of 4 aortic root procedures: valve preservation (remodeling or modified reimplantation, n = 261); composite biologic graft (n = 297); composite mechanical graft (n = 156); or allograft root (n = 243).<h4>Results</h4>Seven deaths occurred (0.73%), none after valve-p ...[more]

PMID: 26778214

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is known to be associated with progressive ascending aortic dilatation, the fate of the residual aorta after aortic valve and ascending aorta surgery is unknown. We reviewed surgical outcomes and explored serial changes in the size of the sinus of Valsalva (SOV) and distal ascending aorta (DAAo) in 89 patients with a BAV undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) and graft replacement (GR) of the ascending aorta.MethodsWe retrospectively examined patients who underwent AVR and GR of the ascending aorta for BAV-and related disease and thoracic aortic dilatation at our institution between January 2009 and December 2018. Patients who underwent AVR alone or required intervention for the aortic root and aortic arch and patients with connective tissue diseases were excluded. Aortic diameters were examined using computed tomography (CT). Late CT more than 1 year after surgery was performed in 69 patients (78%) with a mean follow-up of 4.9±2.8 years.ResultsThe surgical indication for aortic valve etiology was stenosis in 61 patients (69%), regurgitation in 10 (11%), and mixed in 18 (20%). Preoperative maximum short diameters of the ascending aorta, SOV, and DAAo were 47.3±4.7, 36.0±5.2, and 37.2±3.6 mm, respectively. The diameter of the SOV increased non-significantly by 0.08±0.45 mm per year [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.12 to 0.11, P=0.150], while that of the DAAo increased significantly by 0.11±0.40 mm per year (95% CI: 0.02-0.21, P=0.005). One patient required reoperation 6 years postoperatively due to a pseudo-aneurysm at the proximal anastomotic site. No patient required reoperation due to progressive dilatation of the residual aorta. According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the long-term survival rates were 98.9%, 98.9%, and 92.7% at 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively, respectively.ConclusionsRapid dilatation of the residual aorta rarely occurred in patients with a BAV who underwent AVR and GR of the ascending aorta in the mid-term follow-up. For selected patients with a surgical indication for ascending aortic dilatation, simple AVR and GR of the ascending aorta may be sufficient surgical options.

Project description:BackgroundLimited studies have focused on the performance of self-expandable valves (SEVs) and balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) in patients with dilatated ascending aorta (AA) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The present study compared the performance of widely used Edwards BEVs and domestic SEVs in patients with dilatated AA among Chinese population.MethodsWe identified and reviewed 207 patients who had baseline AA diameter ≥40 mm and underwent transfemoral TAVR. Patients were divided into two groups: SEV and BEV. The SEVs were locally manufactured valves that have received Chinese regulatory approval (Venus-A, Taurus One, and VitaFlow), while the BEVs were Edwards Sapien XT and Sapien3. Procedural device success and post-procedural changes of AA diameters were compared.ResultsThe sample size of SEV group was larger than that of BEV group because BEVs were not available in China in the early clinical practice. The overall device success was slightly lower in SEV group compared with BEV group (84.2% vs. 95.8%, P=0.213). However, in the univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, only bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) was found to be an independent risk factor for device failure (OR: 2.632, CI: 1.107-6.257, P=0.029). During the median follow-up of 21 months, no statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding the overall survival (83.1%±4.7% vs. 95.8%±4.1%, P=0.533), and no aortic dissection nor rupture was observed. In a subgroup of patients who had follow-up CTs ≥12-month intervals, the AA diameter appeared to remain stable in SEV group with an aortic expansion rate of 0 (-0.4 to 0.8) mm (P=0.102), while it slightly enlarged in BEV group with an aortic expansion rate of 0.4 (-0.4 to 0.6) mm/y (P=0.038). In addition, the AA diameter also slightly enlarged in patients with BAV [0.2 (0 to 1.0) mm/y, P=0.015], while it remained stable in patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) [0 (-0.8 to 0.6) mm/y, P=0.640].ConclusionsIn patients with dilatated AA who underwent TAVR, the type of THVs did not affect the procedural device success. BAV appeared to be a risk factor for both device failure and higher aortic expansion rate in these patients.

Dataset Information

Long-term survival, valve durability, and reoperation for 4 aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement.

Publications

Long-term survival, valve durability, and reoperation for 4 aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets