Dataset Information

Cardiac Safety Profile of First Dose of Fingolimod for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Real-World Settings: Data from a German Prospective Multi-Center Observational Study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Fingolimod was the first oral therapy approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Due to its action on cardiac sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors, fingolimod is leading to a transient decrease in heart rate (HR) and the occurrence of rare and asymptomatic self-limited atrioventricular (AV) blocks. This German non-interventional clinical study aimed to assess the cardiac safety profile in RRMS patients during at least 6 h after the initial treatment or restart after interruption of fingolimod in real-world settings.

Methods

The GoCARD study (German National Health Authorities, BfArM, CFTY720DDE18, NIS334) was a prospective, multi-center non-interventional study which was conducted in neurological and other medical practices or hospitals, qualified to routinely assess electrocardiogram (ECG) findings. Data were collected through interviews, clinical evaluations (notably ECGs), and laboratory tests. Medical history, vital signs, and a 12-lead ECG were assessed before fingolimod administration. After the first dose, a 6 h ECG was performed and vital signs (blood pressure and HR) were measured hourly. The occurrence of bradycardia (HR ≤45 beats per minute [BPM]), AV blocks (2nd degree Mobitz type I or higher), and corrected QT interval (QTc) intervals was also documented.

Results

More than 95% of physicians adhered to the cardiac monitoring recommendations. The observation of 217 patients in 42 study centers showed that while 35.9% of the patients had any cardiac risk profile, none of them experienced a bradycardia during the 6 h post-dose observation. Overall, only 1.8% of all patients displayed bradycardia (HR ≤45 BPM) during 6 h after treatment initiation. Moreover, in this cohort, none of the patients showed a new or persistent onset AV block (2nd degree Mobitz type I or higher) or QTc ≥500 ms.

Conclusion

Altogether, these data confirm that the first-dose observation after fingolimod initiation is usually uneventful (even in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors of this cohort) and that the rarely observed events remained asymptomatic and self-limited.

Funding

Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.

SUBMITTER: Linker RA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5130918 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Fingolimod approval was based mainly on two clinical trials, FREEDOMS and TRANSFORMS, which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of fingolimod in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We present an observational study that validates these trials findings in a real-world setting, whereby the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod was assessed in Seville's' (Spain) clinical practice. This retrospective study in MS patients assessed effectiveness (relapses, EDSS, gadolinium-enhancing T1 and new/enlarged T2-weighted lesions): total cohort (n = 249) and stratified according to prior treatment (glatiramer acetate/interferon beta-1 [immunomodulator], natalizumab, naïve), gender, basal EDSS score, basal Gd+ lesions, ARR prior to treatment, age at treatment initiation and number of prior treatments. A multivariante model was used to assess the ARR with baseline characteristics. The safety profile (adverse events [AEs]) was also described. Fingolimod reduced the annualized relapse rate (ARR) by 75%, 67% and 85% in the total cohort, patients previously treated with immunomodulatory and naïve patients (p<0.0001 all cases). However, patients previously treated with natalizumab kept a constant ARR. The ARR results and the consequent increase in the proportion of relapse-free patients were independent of the age at treatment initiation, number of prior treatments, gender and basal Gd+ lesions. Although fingolimod was effective regardless the basal EDSS score and ARR prior to fingolimod treatment, better outcomes were observed in patients with basal EDSS score <3 (0.2 vs. 0.4; p = 0.0244) and ARR ? 2 prior to fingolimod treatment (p = 0.0338). Only the basal EDSS score was association with ARR in the first 24 months of fingolimod treatment in the multivariante model (p = 0.0439). The cumulative probability of disability progression was 20% (month-24) in the total cohort, and was independent from prior treatment, age at treatment initiation, number of prior treatments, gender, basal EDSS score, basal Gd+ lesions and ARR prior to treatment. The real-world fingolimod benefits observed in this study seem to be similar than those observed in previous clinical trials.

Project description:Background: Natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) are second-line disease modifying treatments (DMTs) approved for Relapsing - Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Few studies are available on a direct comparison between NTZ and FTY, based on post-marketing experience, with conflicting results and reporting relatively short follow-up period. Aim: We hereby report real-world experience of a MS Center with respect to NTZ vs. FTY comparison in terms of efficacy and safety, referencing long-term follow-up. Methods: We used retrospective data for all patients that received 2nd-line treatment NTZ (since May 2007) or FTY (since September 2011). Primary endpoints were, among others, annual EDSS score (mean change from baseline), time to disability worsening or improvement, Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) after 12 and 24 months and upon total treatment duration, time to first relapse and time to radiological progression. Results: A total of 138 unmatched patients, 84 treated with NTZ and 54 treated with FTY were included. Following Propensity Score (PS) matching, 31 patients in each group were retained. Mean follow-up period for NTZ- and FTY-treated patients was 4.43 ± 0.29 and 3.59 ± 0.32 years (p = 0.057), respectively. In the matched analysis, time to disability improvement and time to disability worsening was comparable between groups. A higher proportion of patients remained free of relapse under NTZ, compared to FTY (Log Rank test p = 0.021, HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.8), as well as free of MRI activity (Log Rank test p = 0.006, HR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.6). Treatment discontinuation due to MRI activity was significantly higher for FTY-treated patients compared to NTZ (Log Rank test p = 0.019, HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05-0.76). Conclusion: Our results indicate toward NTZ superiority with respect to relapse and MRI activity outcomes. The fact that NTZ-treated patients may achieve long-standing clinical and radiological remission points toward the need for long follow-up data.