Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Return to play post-Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rate and measures of return to play.


ABSTRACT: AIM:This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to identify return to play (RTP) rates following Achilles tendon rupture and evaluate what measures are used to determine RTP. DESIGN:A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and grouped based on repeatability of their measure of RTP determination. DATA SOURCES:PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched to identify potentially relevant articles. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES:Studies reporting RTP/sport/sport activity in acute, closed Achilles tendon rupture were included. RESULTS:108 studies encompassing 6506 patients were included for review. 85 studies included a measure for determining RTP. The rate of RTP in all studies was 80% (95% CI 75% to 85%). Studies with measures describing determination of RTP reported lower rates than studies without metrics described, with rates being significantly different between groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:80 per cent of patients returned to play following Achilles tendon rupture; however, the RTP rates are dependent on the quality of the method used to measure RTP. To further understand RTP after Achilles tendon rupture, a standardised, reliable and valid method is required.

SUBMITTER: Zellers JA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5136353 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Return to play post-Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rate and measures of return to play.

Zellers Jennifer A JA   Carmont Michael R MR   Grävare Silbernagel Karin K  

British journal of sports medicine 20160603 21


<h4>Aim</h4>This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to identify return to play (RTP) rates following Achilles tendon rupture and evaluate what measures are used to determine RTP.<h4>Design</h4>A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and grouped based on repeatability of their measure of RTP determination.<h4>Data sources</h4>PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched to identify potentially relevant articles.<h4>  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6304598 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7327851 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6551569 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5117072 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5847201 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6583741 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8197928 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8773411 | biostudies-literature