Metastatic basal cell carcinoma with amplification of PD-L1: exceptional response to anti-PD1 therapy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ikeda S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5142752 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) represent promising novel targets in immunotherapy. PD-1 is an inhibitory receptor involved in T-cell regulation that is expressed by activated T cells. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are anti-PD-1 antibodies that have shown antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in patients with metastatic melanoma in preclinical development and Phase I/II clinical trials. Several ongoing Phase III studies are further investigating the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma. Initial data on the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade with nivolumab and ipilimumab also appear promising. Monoclonal antibodies to blockade PD-L1 may also be an effective immunotherapy strategy in melanoma and several anti-PD-L1 antibodies are in development.
| S-EPMC6094609 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Afatinib is mainly used to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but its therapeutic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma is still unclear. Methods Over 800 drugs were screened by CCK8 technology and afatinib was found to have a significant inhibitory effect on liver cancer cells. The expression of PDL1 in tumor cells treated with drugs were detected by qRT-PCR and Weston Blot experiments. The effects of afatinib on the growth, migration and invasion of HCC cells were evaluated using wound healing, Transwell, and cell cloning assays. The in vivo effects of afatinib in combination with anti-PD1 were evaluated in C57/BL6J mice with subcutaneous tumorigenesis. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to explore the specific mechanism of afatinib's inhibition of ERBB2 in improving the expression level of PD-L1, which was subsequently verified through experiments. Results Afatinib was found to have a significant inhibitory effect on liver cancer cells, as confirmed by in vitro experiments, which demonstrated that it could significantly suppress the growth, invasion and migration of HCC cells. qRT PCR and Weston Blot experiments also showed that Afatinib can enhance the expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells. In addition, in vitro experiments confirmed that afatinib can significantly enhance the immunotherapeutic effect of hepatocellular carcinoma. Afatinib’s ability to increase PD-L1 expression is mediated by STAT3 activation following its action on HCC cells. Conclusion Afatinib enhances PD-L1 expression in tumor cells through the STAT3/PD-L1 pathway. The combination of afatinib and anti-PD1 treatment significantly increases the immunotherapeutic effect of HCC.
| S-EPMC10266343 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSalvage nivolumab and ipilimumab after prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy is frequently used off-label for clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, limited data are available to guide such therapy. We performed a meta-analysis to characterize further the safety and efficacy of salvage nivolumab and ipilimumab.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA. Studies of salvage nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with mRCC published in English before June 1, 2021 were included. We also included patients treated at the Ohio State University from 2012 to 2020 through a retrospective chart review. The included studies were further stratified into adaptive and standard groups based on their designs. We calculated objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) via pooled data and quantitative synthesis using the Stata metaprop procedure. A conservative random effect model was used to combine values.ResultsA total of 7 studies and 310 patients were included. Salvage nivolumab and ipilimumab had an ORR of 14% (95% CI, 0.09-0.21) and median progression-free survival ranged between 3.7 and 5.5 months. Four out of the seven studies were standard design, whereas the other three studies were adaptive. The ORR was numerically higher in the standard group compared with the adaptive group (21% and 9-10%, respectively). The responses to salvage nivolumab and ipilimumab did not correlate with the initial anti-PD-1/PD-L1 responses (odds ratio = 1.45; p = 0.5). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 26% of the patients (95% CI, 0.19-0.33). There were no new safety signals observed in this study.ConclusionSalvage nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated moderate antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with mRCC who had prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.Implication for practicePatients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma have limited treatment options after progressive disease on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. The role of salvage nivolumab and ipilimumab in this patient population is poorly defined. The studies on this highly important and clinically relevant topic are limited by small sample sizes. The results from our meta-analysis suggest that nivolumab and ipilimumab are feasible in the salvage setting with moderate efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile. The response rates differ with different treatment designs. This information will be beneficial to guide clinical decision-making and accurately estimating toxicity.
| S-EPMC8986145 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In the last few years, the unprecedented results of immune checkpoint inhibitors have led to a paradigm shift in clinical practice for the treatment of several cancer types. However, the vast majority of patients with gastrointestinal cancer do not benefit from immunotherapy. To date, microsatellite instability high and DNA mismatch repair deficiency are the only robust predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Unfortunately, these patients comprise only 5%-10% of all gastrointestinal cancers. Several mechanisms of both innate and adaptive resistance to immunotherapy have been recognized that may be at least in part responsible for the failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this population of patients. In the first part of this review article, we provide an overview of the main clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and the role of predictive biomarkers. In the second part, we discuss the actual body of knowledge in terms of mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy and the most promising approach that are currently under investigation in order to expand the population of patients with gastrointestinal cancer who could benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors.
| S-EPMC7223273 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction: The use of antibodies against programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) has improved survival in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. However, reliable and convenient biomarkers of early responses and outcomes are still lacking. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively screened mUC patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy at our institute. A modified urothelium immune prognostic index (mUIPI) based on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was developed to characterize the three groups as good, intermediate, and poor mUIPI. Major observations were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR). Results: We identified 52 mUC patients with a median follow-up time of 29.8 months (95% CI, 26.3-53.2). Low NLR was with improved PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40, 95% CI, 0.18-0.92; HR, 0.27, 95% CI, 0.11-0.69, respectively). Normal LDH was associated with improved PFS but not OS (HR, 0.22, 95% CI, 0.10-0.52; HR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.34-2.13, respectively). The median PFS for the poor, intermediate, and good mUIPI groups was 1.97 months (95% CI, 1.15 to NR), 3.48 months (95% CI, 1.58 to NR), and 14.52 months (95% CI, 5.75 to NR), respectively (p < 0.001). The median OS for the poor, intermediate, and good mUIPI was 12.82, 18.11, and 34.87 months, respectively (p = 0.28). A good mUIPI was associated with a higher DCR compared to intermediate and poor mUIPI (odds ratio [OR] 7.58, 95% CI, 1.73-43.69; OR, 6.49, 95% CI, 0.14-295.42, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, a good mUIPI was associated with improved PFS in the subgroups of male patients and patients with low urinary tract primary tumors, liver metastases, non-first-line treatment, and monotherapy. Conclusions: mUIPI predicts early responses in mUC patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy.
| S-EPMC8387676 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Elucidating the adaptive mechanisms that prevent host immune response in cancer will help predict efficacy of anti-programmed death-1 (PD1)/L1 therapies. Here, we study the cell-intrinsic response of lung cancer (LC) to interferon-γ (IFNγ), a cytokine that promotes immunoresponse and modulates programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels. We report complete refractoriness to IFNγ in a subset of LCs as a result of JAK2 or IFNGR1 inactivation. A submaximal response affects another subset that shows constitutive low levels of IFNγ-stimulated genes (IγSGs) coupled with decreased H3K27ac (histone 3 acetylation at lysine 27) deposition and promoter hypermethylation and reduced IFN regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) recruitment to the DNA on IFNγ stimulation. Most of these are neuroendocrine small cell LCs (SCLCs) with oncogenic MYC/MYCL1/MYCN. The oncogenic activation of MYC in SCLC cells downregulates JAK2 and impairs IγSGs stimulation by IFNγ. MYC amplification tends to associate with a worse response to anti-PD1/L1 therapies. Hence alterations affecting the JAK/STAT pathway and MYC activation prevent stimulation by IFNγ and may predict anti-PD1/L1 efficacy in LC.
| S-EPMC10140599 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recently, checkpoint inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has been shown to be therapeutically relevant in urothelial carcinoma (UC). To evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of PD-L1 on response and survival in UC patients after cystectomy, chemotherapy, or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed. A total of 2154 patients from 14 published studies were included. In all UC patients after cystectomy, tumour cell (TC) PD-L1 expression was not associated with the OS or PFS. For the subset of patients with organ-confined disease, TC PD-L1 expression significantly predicted OS after cystectomy (P = 0.0004). There was no significant evidence of an association between TC PD-L1 status and ORR or OS for UC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. For UC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, TC PD-L1 expression ≥ 5% could predict the response (P = 0.005), but not for the 1% cut-off (P ≥ 0.05). As for PD-L1 expression in tumour-inflating immune cells (TIICs), both subsets with IC2/3 vs. IC0/1 and IC1/2/3 vs. IC0 were associated with ORR to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. In the TIIC subset, IC2/3 vs. IC0/1 of PD-L1 was associated with higher CR (P = 0.002), PR (P = 0.04), and PD (P = 0.007). Further, higher TIIC PD-L1 status benefited from longer PFS (P < 0.001), but was not associated with OS in UC patients with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Our study suggested that TIIC PD-L1 expression with 5% cut-off was valuable as a predictive and prognostic biomarker for ORR and PFS in UC patients with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.
| S-EPMC7336219 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Monoclonal antibodies that block immune regulatory proteins such as programmed death-1 (PD-1) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in controlling the growth of multiple tumor types. Unresectable or metastatic basal cell carcinoma, however, has largely gone untested. Because PD-Ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in other tumor types has been associated with response to anti-PD-1, we investigated the expression of PD-L1 and its association with PD-1 expression in the basal cell carcinoma tumor microenvironment. Among 40 basal cell carcinoma specimens, 9/40 (22%) demonstrated PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, and 33/40 (82%) demonstrated PD-L1 expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and associated macrophages. PD-L1 was observed in close geographic association to PD-1+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Additionally, we present, here, the first report of an objective anti-tumor response to pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in a patient with metastatic PD-L1 (+) basal cell carcinoma, whose disease had previously progressed through hedgehog pathway-directed therapy. The patient remains in a partial response 14 months after initiation of therapy. Taken together, our findings provide a rationale for testing anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma, either as initial treatment or after acquired resistance to hedgehog pathway inhibition.
| S-EPMC5360064 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and its receptor RANK, are members of the tumor necrosis factor and receptor superfamilies, respectively. Antibodies targeting RANKL have recently been evaluated in combination with anti-CTLA4 in case reports of human melanoma and mouse models of cancer. However, the efficacy of anti-RANKL in combination with antibodies targeting other immune checkpoint receptors such as PD1 has not been reported. In this study, we demonstrated that blockade of RANKL improves anti-metastatic activity of antibodies targeting PD1/PD-L1 and improves subcutaneous growth suppression in mouse models of melanoma, prostate and colon cancer. Suppression of experimental lung metastasis following combination anti-RANKL with anti-PD1 requires NK cells and IFN-γ, whereas subcutaneous tumor growth suppression with this combination therapy is attenuated in the absence of T cells and IFN-γ. Furthermore, addition of anti-RANKL to anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 resulted in superior anti-tumor responses, irrespective of the ability of anti-CTLA4 isotype to engage activating FcR, and concurrent or delayed RANKL blockade was most effective. Early-during-treatment assessment reveals this triple combination therapy compared to dual anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 combination therapy further increased the proportion of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that can produce both IFN-γ and TNF. Finally, RANKL expression appears to identify tumor-specific CD8+ T cells expressing higher levels of PD1 which can be modulated by anti-PD1. These data set the scene for clinical evaluation of denosumab use in patients receiving contemporary immune checkpoint blockade.
| S-EPMC5980384 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDue to the increasing number of trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the first-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to investigate the difference between anti PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies, used alone or in combination with chemotherapy, through adjusted indirect analysis to minimize the potential bias regarding overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs).MethodsA systematic review of studies reporting clinical outcomes and toxicity associated with first-line therapy employing anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies alone, or in combination with chemotherapy, to treat metastatic, treatment-naïve NSCLC patients was performed. Primary outcomes were OS, PFS, ORR and grade 3-5 AEs. We used a random-effects model to generate pooled estimates for proportions. Meta-analyses using pooled risk ratios were performed for binary outcomes from comparative studies with the random effects model.ResultsA total of 13 eligible studies met our eligibility criteria, including 7673 patients. In the ICI-chemotherapy combination subgroup, we observed that anti-PD1 therapy was associated with better OS (p = 0.022) and PFS (p = 0.029) compared with anti-PD-L1 therapy. In the monotherapy subgroup, there was no statistical difference between the use of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 for OS and PFS. With regard to ORR and toxicity, in the ICI-chemotherapy combination subgroup, we observed a trend of better ORR (p = 0.12) with the use of anti-PD1 therapy and less frequent grade 3-5 AEs compared to the use of anti-PD-L1 therapy (p = 0.0302). In the monotherapy subgroup, there was no statistical difference between the use of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 regarding ORR and toxicity.ConclusionsOur study suggests that PD-1 drug plus chemotherapy is superior to anti-PD-L1 plus chemotherapy for NSCLC; nevertheless, as monotherapy, both strategies appear to be similar.
| S-EPMC8017262 | biostudies-literature