Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

10 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Role of multimodality therapy in cIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: perspective.

ABSTRACT: A number of promising new approaches for both local and systemic control of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer have been examined in clinical trials, aimed at improving the patient survival. Development of better systemic therapies by adopting newer agents (such as epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors) from advanced non-small cell lung cancer is mandatory. As for radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy and proton therapy are under investigation after the RTOG 0617 trial unexpectedly failed to show the efficacy of high-dose radiotherapy for Stage III disease. To date, no Phase III trial has clearly shown the benefit of adding surgery as a part of multimodality therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Such poor progress in the development of effective treatments for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer is considered to be attributable to the existence of heterogeneities in the disease characteristics, including the biological and anatomic characteristics. Constant effort via well-designed and well-conducted clinical trials is needed to decipher the heterogeneity of Stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

SUBMITTER: Horinouchi H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5144660 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Multimodality Therapy for N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Evolving Paradigm.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Induction chemoradiation for resectable N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is used with the intent to optimize locoregional control, whereas induction chemotherapy given in systemic doses is meant to optimally target potential distant disease. However, the optimal preoperative treatment regimen is still unknown and practice patterns continue to vary widely. We compared multiinstitutional oncologic outcomes for N2 NSCLC from 4 experienced lung cancer treatment centers. METHODS:This collaborative retrospective study unites 4 major thoracic oncology centers. Patients with N2 NSCLC undergoing surgical resection after induction chemotherapy (CxT) or concurrent chemoradiation (CxRT) were included. Primary outcomes were overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS). RESULTS:822 patients were identified (CxT = 662 and CxRT = 160). There were no differences in 5-year OS (CxT 39.9% versus CxRT 42.9%, p = 0.250) nor in DFS (CxT 28.7% versus 29.8%, p = 0.207). Recurrence rates (CxT 46.8% versus CxRT 51.6%, p = 0.282) and recurrence patterns were not significantly different (Local: CxT 9.8% versus CxRT 9.7%; and Distant: CxT 30.4% versus CxRT 33.1%, p = 0.764). There was no difference in perioperative mortality. In the analyses of patients who underwent pretreatment invasive mediastinal staging (n = 555), there were still no significant differences in OS (p = 0.341) and DFS (p = 0.455) between the 2 treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS:Both treatment strategies produce equivalent and better than expected outcomes compared with historical controls for N2 NSCLC, with no differences in recurrence patterns. How these conventional therapeutic strategies will compare with those involving immunotherapy combined with surgical locoregional disease control for N2 disease remains to be determined.

| S-EPMC6993842 | biostudies-literature

Multimodality Treatment including Surgery Related to the Type of N2 Involvement in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Project description:For patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or positive N1 nodes, multimodality treatment is indicated. However, the optimal management of patients presenting with ipsilateral positive mediastinal nodes (N2 disease) has not been determined yet. Different treatment regimens consisting of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery have been proposed and implemented previously. In more recent years, immunotherapy and targeted therapies have been added as therapeutic options. The role of surgery is currently redefined. Recent studies have shown that surgical resection after induction immunotherapy or targeted therapy is feasible and yields good short-term results. In this review, we summarize the latest data on multimodality treatment options for stage IIIA-N2 locally advanced NSCLC, depending on the extent of nodal involvement.

| S-EPMC8997106 | biostudies-literature

[Prognostic Factors of N2 Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Surgery].

Project description:BACKGROUND:Patients with N2 stage non-small cell lung cancer have prognostic heterogeneity, and this study attempted to explore the prognostic factors among those patients. METHODS:Patients with N2 stage undergoing radical resection in Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China hospital, Sichuan University between January 2007 and December 2016 were included. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to explore the prognostic value of clinicopathological features. Survival curves were plotted by Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analyses considering the situation of lymph node involvement were performed. RESULTS:In total, 773 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 57.2 months, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 34.8%. Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, number of involved lymph node stations, skip metastasis, lymphatic or vascular invasion and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. The patients with stage T1-3 had similar prognosis, while the patients with stage T4 had worse survival. In addition, the patients with single station involvement and skip metastasis had the best prognosis with a 5-years overall survival rate of 48.9%. CONCLUSIONS:T4 stage patients had worse survival in N2 group. To get a more precisely stratification, skip metastasis and number of involved lymph node stations should be considered in future N stage classification.

| S-EPMC7007397 | biostudies-literature

Adjuvant therapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery.

Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to determine whether adjuvant therapy improves survival in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 467 consecutive patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC who received neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery between 2004 and 2013. From these, we identified 398 eligible patients and their clinical outcomes were compared according to whether adjuvant therapy was provided.ResultsIn total, 296 patients (74%) received adjuvant therapy consisting of chemotherapy alone (n=71) radiotherapy alone (n=118) and both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n=107). Adjuvant therapy was not given to remaining 102 patients. Patients who receiving adjuvant therapy were significantly younger (P=0.001), and predominantly male (P=0.014) compared to patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Regarding to the pathologic response, the adjuvant therapy group had a significantly poor pathologic response. However, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate did not significantly differ between the groups (adjuvant therapy group, 52.9%; no adjuvant therapy group, 54.9%; P=0.369). After adjusting for age, sex, type of operation, cell type and yp stage, adjuvant therapy was significantly associated with better OS (hazard ratio =0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92; P=0.019) and disease free survival (hazard ratio =0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87; P=0.006).ConclusionsOur data indicate that adjuvant therapy is more often given to patients with poor pathologic findings. Adjuvant treatment after trimodal therapy is a significant predictor of survival after adjustment of clinical variables.

| S-EPMC7330356 | biostudies-literature

Multimodality Imaging Assessment of the Heart Before and After Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC9006649 | biostudies-literature

Advances in multimodal treatment for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

Project description:Background and aimIn Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the accuracy of combined positron-emission tomography/computed tomography imaging (PET-CT), together with mediastinal staging techniques, has led to a wide range of challenging clinical scenarios in terms of therapeutic management. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation immunotherapy remains the standard of care. In patients with potentially-resectable disease, surgery plays an important role in multimodal therapy. The introduction of targeted therapies and immune-checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized multimodal treatment. In the present article, we review current treatment options and future trends in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.Relevance for patientsThis article provides insight into the current status of multimodal treatment for NSCLC to support decision-making in routine clinical practice.

| S-EPMC8177852 | biostudies-literature

Role of cytokines in combinatorial immunotherapeutics of non-small cell lung cancer through systems perspective.

Project description:Lung cancer is the leading cause of deaths related to cancer and accounts for more than a million deaths per year. Various new strategies have been developed and adapted for treatment; still the survival for 5 years is just 16% in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most of these strategies to combat NSCLC whether it is a drug molecule or immunotherapy/vaccine candidate require a big cost and time. Integration of computational modeling with systems biology has opened new avenues for understanding complex cancer biology. Resolving the complex interactions of various pathways and their crosstalk leading to oncogenic changes could identify new therapeutic targets with lesser cost and time. Herein, this review provides an overview of various aspects of NSCLC along with available strategies for its cure concluding with our insight into how systems approach could serve as a therapeutic intervention dissecting the immunologic parameters and cross talk between various pathways involved.

| S-EPMC6536974 | biostudies-literature

EGFR targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: potential role of cetuximab.

Project description:Chemotherapy alone has limited ability to significantly improve survival in non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) beyond what has already been achieved. The epidermal growth factor (EGF) pathway plays a vital role in the pathogenesis and progression of NSCLC. Two classes of drugs inhibit the EGF receptor (EGFR) pathway: small molecules that inhibit the intracellular tyrosine kinase activity of the receptor, and monoclonal antibodies that target the extracellular domain in the ligand-binding region. Cetuximab is a human - mouse chimeric immunoglobulin G1 class monoclonal antibody directed against EGFR. Preclinical studies with cetuximab suggested that there was inhibition of growth of human NSCLC cell lines. Cetuximab is currently the focus of intense investigation in various patient populations with NSCLC. This review focuses on clinical trials of cetuximab in NSCLC and identifies future directions with this agent.

| S-EPMC2726075 | biostudies-literature

Particle therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Project description:The finite range of proton beams in tissues offers unique dosimetric advantages that theoretically allow the dose to the target to be escalated while minimizing exposure of surrounding tissues and thereby minimizing radiation-induced toxicity. These theoretical advantages have led to widespread adoption of proton therapy around the world for a wide variety of tumors at different anatomic sites. Many treatment-planning comparisons have shown that proton therapy has substantial dosimetric advantages over conventional photon (X-ray) radiation therapy. However, given the typically significant difference in cost between proton therapy versus conventional photon therapy, strong evidence of proton therapy's clinical benefits in terms of toxicity and survival is warranted. Some findings from retrospective studies, single-arm prospective studies, and a very few randomized clinical trials comparing these modalities are beginning to emerge. In this review, we examine the available data on proton therapy for (non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC). We begin by discussing the unique challenges involved in treating moving targets with significant tissue heterogeneity and the technologic efforts underway to overcome these challenges. We then discuss the rationale for minimizing normal tissue toxicity, particularly pulmonary, cardiac, and hematologic toxicity, within the context of previously unsuccessful attempts at dose escalation for lung cancer. Finally, we explore strategies for accelerating the development of trials aimed at measuring meaningful clinical endpoints and for maximizing the value of proton therapy by personalizing its use for individual patients.

| S-EPMC5960664 | biostudies-literature

Vaccine Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Project description:Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint modulators has revolutionized the oncology field, emerging as a new standard of care for multiple indications, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, prognosis for patients with lung cancer is still poor. Although immunotherapy is highly effective in some cases, not all patients experience significant or durable responses, and further strategies are needed to improve outcomes. Therapeutic cancer vaccines are designed to exploit the body's immune system to activate long-lasting memory against tumor cells that ensure tumor regression, with minimal toxicity. A unique feature of cancer vaccines lies in their complementary approach to boost antitumor immunity that could potentially act synergistically with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, single-line immunization against tumor epitopes with vaccine-based therapeutics has been disappointingly unsuccessful, to date, in lung cancer. The high level of success of several recent vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 has highlighted the evolving advances in science and technology in the vaccines field, raising hope that this strategy can be successfully applied to cancer treatments. In this review, we describe the biology behind the cancer vaccines, and discuss current evidence for the different types of therapeutic cancer vaccines in NSCLC, including their mechanisms of action, current clinical development, and future strategies.

| S-EPMC9146850 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data