Dataset Information

An actigraphy study investigating sleep in bipolar I patients, unaffected siblings and controls.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Disturbances in sleep and waking patterns are highly prevalent during mood episodes in bipolar disorder. The question remains whether these disturbances persist during phases of euthymia and whether they are heritable traits of bipolar disorder. The current study investigates objective sleep measures in a large sample of bipolar I patients, non-affected siblings and controls. METHODS:A total of 107 bipolar disorder I patients, 74 non-affected siblings, and 80 controls were included. Sleep was measured with actigraphy over the course of 14 days. Seven sleep parameters were analyzed for group differences and their relationship with age at onset, number of episodes and psychotic symptoms using linear mixed model analysis to account for family dependencies. RESULTS:Patients had a longer sleep duration and later time of sleep offset compared to the non-affected siblings but these differences were entirely attributable to differences in mood symptoms. We found no difference between patients and controls or siblings and controls when the analyses were restricted to euthymic patients. None of the bipolar illness characteristics were associated with sleep. LIMITATIONS:Medication use was not taken into account which may have influenced our findings and controls were younger compared to non-affected siblings. CONCLUSIONS:In the largest study to date, our findings suggest that recovered bipolar I patients and their siblings do not experience clinically significant sleep disturbances. Sleep disturbances are primarily a reflection of current mood state, but are unrelated to the course of the disorder.

SUBMITTER: Verkooijen S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5154955 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

An actigraphy study investigating sleep in bipolar I patients, unaffected siblings and controls.

Verkooijen Sanne S van Bergen Annet H AH Knapen Stefan E SE Vreeker Annabel A Abramovic Lucija L Pagani Lucia L Jung Yoon Y Riemersma-van der Lek Rixt R Schoevers Robert A RA Takahashi Joseph S JS Kahn René S RS Boks Marco P M MPM Ophoff Roel A RA

Journal of affective disorders 20161011

<h4>Objectives</h4>Disturbances in sleep and waking patterns are highly prevalent during mood episodes in bipolar disorder. The question remains whether these disturbances persist during phases of euthymia and whether they are heritable traits of bipolar disorder. The current study investigates objective sleep measures in a large sample of bipolar I patients, non-affected siblings and controls.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 107 bipolar disorder I patients, 74 non-affected siblings, and 80 controls w ...[more]

PMID: 27792970

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The concept of misperception of sleep refers to the estimated discrepancy between subjective and objective measures of sleep. This has been assessed only in a few prior studies in individuals with Bipolar Disorder (BD) as compared to Healthy Controls (HC) and with mixed results. METHODS:We assessed a sample of 133 euthymic individuals with BD and 63 HC for retrospective subjective (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) and objective (21 days of actigraphy recording) measures of total sleep time, sleep latency and sleep efficiency. We first investigated the correlations between these subjective and objective measures in the two groups. We then compared individuals with BD and HC for the absolute values of the differences between subjective and objective sleep parameters, used as a proxy of the magnitude of misperception of sleep. Finally, we undertook regression analyses to assess associations between clinical groups, core demographics, clinical factors and misperception of sleep. RESULTS:The correlation coefficients between subjective and objective measures of sleep did not differ between groups (total sleep time: rho?=?.539 in BD and rho?=?.584 in HC; sleep latency: rho?=?.190 in BD and rho?=?.125 in HC; sleep efficiency: rho?=?.166 in BD and rho?=?.222 in HC). Individuals with BD did not differ from HC in the magnitude of misperception of total sleep time, sleep latency nor sleep efficiency. Individuals with BD type 1 misperceived their sleep efficiency significantly more than individuals with BD type 2, with no further difference between BD type 1 and BD type 2 regarding sleep latency and sleep duration misperceptions. Three factors (age, symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea, and mild depressive symptoms), were the main contributors to the magnitude of misperception of sleep. CONCLUSIONS:Misperception of sleep was not associated with a diagnosis of BD. In this sample, mild depressive symptoms, older age, or symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea may be related to greater sleep misperception. In that case, the reliability of subjective measures may decrease as the misperception of sleep increases. This study may help guide clinicians in selecting the best approach for assessing sleep (objective versus subjective measures) in individuals with BD.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Altered structural network-connectivity has been reported in psychotic disorder but whether these alterations are associated with genetic vulnerability, and/or with phenotypic variation, has been less well examined. This study examined i) whether differences in network-connectivity exist between patients with psychotic disorder, siblings of patients with psychotic disorder and controls, and ii) whether network-connectivity alterations vary with (subclinical) symptomatology. METHODS:Network-connectivity measures (global efficiency (GE), density, local efficiency (LE), clustering coefficient (CC)) were derived from diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and were compared between 85 patients with psychotic disorder, 93 siblings without psychotic disorder and 80 healthy comparison subjects using multilevel regression models. In patients, associations between Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) symptoms and topological measures were examined. In addition, interactions between subclinical psychopathology and sibling/healthy comparison subject status were examined in models of topological measures. RESULTS:While there was no main effect of group with respect to GE, density, LE and CC, siblings had a significantly higher CC compared to patients (B = 0.0039, p = .002). In patients, none of the PANSS symptom domains were significantly associated with any of the four network-connectivity measures. The two-way interaction between group and SIR-r positive score in the model of LE was significant (χ2 = 6.24, p = .01, df = 1). In the model of CC, the interactions between group and respectively SIS-r positive (χ2 = 5.59, p = .02, df = 1) and negative symptom scores (χ2 = 4.71, p = .03, df = 1) were significant. Stratified analysis showed that, in siblings, decreased LE and CC was significantly associated with increased SIS-r positive scores (LE: B = -0.0049, p = .003, CC: B = -0.0066, p = .01) and that decreased CC was significantly associated with increased SIS-r negative scores (B = -0.012, p = .003). There were no significant interactions between group and SIS-r scores in the models of GE and density. CONCLUSION:The findings indicate absence of structural network-connectivity alterations in individuals with psychotic disorder and in individuals at higher than average genetic risk for psychotic disorder, in comparison with healthy subjects. The differential subclinical symptom-network connectivity associations in siblings with respect to controls may be a sign of psychosis vulnerability in the siblings.

Dataset Information

An actigraphy study investigating sleep in bipolar I patients, unaffected siblings and controls.

Publications

An actigraphy study investigating sleep in bipolar I patients, unaffected siblings and controls.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets