Dataset Information

Time Delays in Transdermal Alcohol Concentrations Relative to Breath Alcohol Concentrations.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Monitors of transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) provide an objective measurement of alcohol consumption that is less invasive than measurements in blood, breath or urine; however, there is a substantial time delay in the onset of TAC compared to blood or breath alcohol concentrations (BrACs). The current study examined the characteristics of the delay between peak TAC and peak BrAC.

Methods

Data was aggregated from three experimental laboratory studies (N = 61; 32 men, 29 women) in which participants wore a TAC monitor and BrAC was monitored while drinking one, two, three, four and five beers in the laboratory. Analyses examined the sex- and dose-related differences in peak BrAC and TAC, the time-to-peak BrAC and TAC, and time lag between the peak BrAC and TAC values.

Results

The times-to-peak were an increasing function of the number of beers consumed. At each level of beer consumption the peak TAC averaged lower than peak BrAC and times-to-peak TAC were longer than for BrAC. The time-to-peak BrAC and TAC was longer for women than men. The congruence between peak TAC and BrAC increased as a function of the beers consumed. No sex difference in the time lag between peak BrAC and TAC was detected.

Conclusions

The congruence between TAC and BrAC and time lags between TAC and BrAC are related to the number of beers consumed. Peak values of TAC and BrAC became more congruent with higher doses but the time lag increased as a function of the amount of alcohol consumed.

Short summary

The time delay (or lag) and congruence between transdermal vs. BrACs increases as the number of beers increases. Though sex differences are evident in peak transdermal and BrACs, no sex differences were evident in the time lag and the congruence between transdermal and breath alcohol concentrations.

SUBMITTER: Karns-Wright TE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5169032 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Time Delays in Transdermal Alcohol Concentrations Relative to Breath Alcohol Concentrations.

Karns-Wright Tara E TE Roache John D JD Hill-Kapturczak Nathalie N Liang Yuanyuan Y Mullen Jillian J Dougherty Donald M DM

Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) 20160813 1

<h4>Aims</h4>Monitors of transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) provide an objective measurement of alcohol consumption that is less invasive than measurements in blood, breath or urine; however, there is a substantial time delay in the onset of TAC compared to blood or breath alcohol concentrations (BrACs). The current study examined the characteristics of the delay between peak TAC and peak BrAC.<h4>Methods</h4>Data was aggregated from three experimental laboratory studies (N = 61; 32 men, 29 ...[more]

PMID: 27522029

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAlcohol biomarkers can improve detection of heavy alcohol use in clinical care, yet cutoffs for phosphatidylethanol (PEth), a blood biomarker, have not been established.ObjectiveTo determine the optimal cutoff for PEth for heavy alcohol consumption in a study of middle-age and older adults.Design, setting, and participantsThis was a 4-week diagnostic study of adults with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and current alcohol consumption, recruited from general cardiology and cardiac electrophysiology outpatient clinics from September 2014 to September 2019. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to March 2022.Main outcomes and measuresThe main aim was to determine the optimal PEth cutoff for heavy alcohol consumption, using the Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) to measure transdermal alcohol. Area under the curve (AUC) for PEth-detected compared with SCRAM-detected heavy alcohol consumption in any week over the prior 4 weeks (ie, ≥3 [women] and ≥4 [men] episodes) or any estimated breath alcohol of 0.08% or greater in any week, and the PEth cutoff was calculated using the Youden J statistic. Similar analyses were conducted comparing PEth with individual drinks reported by pressing an event monitor, retrospective self-report via the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C), and using 2-week look-backs.ResultsIn this diagnostic study of 64 patients with both PEth and SCRAM measures over 4 weeks (54 [84.4%] men; mean age, 65.5 [95% CI, 62.6-68.5] years; 51 [79.7%] White), 31 (48.4%) had any SCRAM-detected heavy alcohol consumption over the 4 weeks, and the median (IQR) PEth at 4 weeks was 23 ng/mL (<limit of quantification to 60 ng/mL). The AUC for PEth vs any SCRAM-detected heavy alcohol consumption was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93). The optimal PEth cutoff was 18.5 ng/mL (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.93), with sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI, 66.3%-94.5%) and specificity of 72.7% (95% CI, 54.5%-86.7%). The PEth test characteristics by individual drink reporting using the event monitors and by the AUDIT-C, and by these measures and by SCRAM collected for 2-week intervals, were similar to those compared with the 4-week SCRAM.Conclusions and relevanceIn a predominately middle-age and older White male population, PEth compared well with SCRAM. A PEth cutoff of 18.5 ng/mL (or rounded to 20 ng/mL, a recommended PEth cutoff for significant alcohol consumption) can be used in clinical care to detect heavy alcohol consumption in middle-age and older men.

Project description:BackgroundThere are a range of wearable transdermal alcohol sensors that are available and are being developed. These devices have the potential to monitor alcohol consumption continuously over extended periods in an objective manner, overcoming some of the limitations of other alcohol measurement methods (blood, breath, and urine).ObjectiveThe objective of our systematic review was to assess wearable transdermal alcohol sensor accuracy.MethodsA systematic search of the CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus bibliographic databases was conducted in February 2021. In total, 2 team members (EB and SH) independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. The methodological quality of each study was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The primary outcome was transdermal alcohol sensor accuracy. The data were presented as a narrative synthesis.ResultsWe identified and analyzed 32 studies. Study designs included laboratory, ambulatory, and mixed designs, as well as randomized controlled trials; the length of time for which the device was worn ranged from days to weeks; and the analyzed sample sizes ranged from 1 to 250. The results for transdermal alcohol concentration data from various transdermal alcohol sensors were generally found to positively correlate with breath alcohol concentration, blood alcohol concentration, and self-report (moderate to large correlations). However, there were some discrepancies between study reports; for example, WrisTAS sensitivity ranged from 24% to 85.6%, and specificity ranged from 67.5% to 92.94%. Higher malfunctions were reported with the BACtrack prototype (16%-38%) and WrisTAS (8%) than with SCRAM (2%); however, the former devices also reported a reduced time lag for peak transdermal alcohol concentration values when compared with SCRAM. It was also found that many companies were developing new models of wearable transdermal alcohol sensors.ConclusionsAs shown, there is a lack of consistency in the studies on wearable transdermal alcohol sensor accuracy regarding study procedures and analyses of findings, thus making it difficult to draw direct comparisons between them. This needs to be considered in future research, and there needs to be an increase in studies directly comparing different transdermal alcohol sensors. There is also a lack of research investigating the accuracy of transdermal alcohol sensors as a tool for monitoring alcohol consumption in clinical populations and use over extended periods. Although there is some preliminary evidence suggesting the accuracy of these devices, this needs to be further investigated in clinical populations.Trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42021231027; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=231027.

Project description:Research on contingency management is limited due to feasibility issues with monitoring adherence. Incentives usually depend on objective measures to verify compliance; therefore, biological markers for identifying alcohol use are not as dependable for the use of financial contingency studies. The Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) is an objective alcohol biosensor that can be locked onto a person's ankle to address these limitations. In preparation for a large, contingency management study for HIV-positive and HIV-negative persons with heavy drinking, the aims for the study were to (1) explore barriers and facilitators to participating in a contingency management intervention using the SCRAM ankle monitor as the potential alcohol measure for the intervention; (2) explore levels of appropriate compensation for using the SCRAM and for study assessments as part of a contingency management intervention study; and (3) attitudes and beliefs on lifestyle changes as a consequence of wearing the SCRAM among HIV-positive and HIV-negative heavy drinkers in Florida. Five focus groups were conducted and we collected qualitative data from thirty-seven individuals (18 men; 19 women). During the analysis, six themes were identified as barriers and facilitators for participation in a contingency management intervention using the SCRAM sensor to measure alcohol use: (1) health assessment, (2) monetary incentives including payment structure and levels of compensation, (3) stigma associated with wearing the SCRAM sensor, (4) aesthetics and other related concerns with wearing the SCRAM sensor, (5) motivation to stop drinking, and (6) social support. Stigma was a major barrier for wearing the SCRAM sensor; however, if participants were motivated to change their behavior then the monetary incentives became a facilitator to wearing the sensor. In addition to the financial contingency method, social support may further increase the odds for participants to change their behaviors.

Project description:BackgroundSeveral studies have objectively quantified drinking through the use of Alcohol Monitoring System's (AMS) transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) device known as SCRAM CAM. Criteria that AMS uses to detect drinking are known to be conservative and only reliably detect heavy drinking equivalent to 5 or more standard drinks. Our group has developed Research Rules used to process TAC data in a manner that will detect low-level and moderate drinking even though it is below the AMS criteria for detection.MethodsSixteen male and 14 female paid research volunteers wore TAC monitors for 28 days in their natural environments and responded daily to text message prompts to self-report the previous day's drinking. Current analyses describe the Research Rules that we developed and how use of those rules impacts the detection of self-reported drinking treated as the standard in sensitivity/specificity analysis.ResultsWe observed 606 occurrences of positive TAC events over a total of 867 days and processed the TAC data to retain 345 as possible drinking events, even though AMS criteria confirmed drinking for only 163 of these events. The kinds of TAC events removed or retained by our rules are illustrated as cases of low and moderate drinking days that were detected by our rules but not by the conservative AMS criteria. AMS-confirmed TAC events have a high specificity (99.8%) to detect primarily heavy drinking, but have a poor sensitivity to detect lower-level drinking and a poor specificity as an indicator of alcohol abstinence. In contrast, our Research Rules detected 100% of TAC events detected by AMS but also detected 31% of the lower-level drinking events not detected by AMS, with 91% specificity.ConclusionsReliance upon the AMS criteria for alcohol detection affords a high specificity for detection of heavy drinking but is a poor indicator of abstinence rates. In contrast, use of our Research Rules provides more sensitive means to quantify either any drinking or low-moderate levels of drinking while still maintaining good specificity.

Dataset Information

Time Delays in Transdermal Alcohol Concentrations Relative to Breath Alcohol Concentrations.

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Short summary

Publications

Time Delays in Transdermal Alcohol Concentrations Relative to Breath Alcohol Concentrations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets