Dataset Information

Objective assessment of a preterm infant's nutritive sucking from initiation of feeding through hospitalization and discharge.

ABSTRACT: In 2008, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that an infant's ability to feed independently be considered a primary consideration for discharge home. To date, NICU healthcare teams have relied on clinical experience as well as descriptive scales to determine a high risk infant's ability to transition safely from tube feeding to oral feeding. The aim of the current case study was to illustrate the clinical utility of nfant® Feeding Solution as a noninvasive and objective instrument for determining a neonate's readiness to begin and advance oral feeding.We present the case of AC, a female infant born at 28.6 weeks, with an admitting diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome. Data collection began when AC was declared medical stable by her attending physician and ready to begin oral feedings. Data was captured during hospitalization and at discharge as well as post discharge for a total of eleven (11) data collections.Results suggested that the subject progressed in all sucking metrics over time. Data analyses revealed three general amplitude and temporal patterns against the nipple: disorganized, hypervigilant, and then organized. Real time data was used to gain immediate feedback on the impact of interventions on sucking performance.Successful infant feeding is a complex process that requires integration of physiologic function and neurobehavioral ability. To model AC's feeding performance over time, we used nfant Feeding Solution which measures tongue movement against the nipple and streams the data to a mobile tablet so it is displayed in real time. Access to real-time data provides caregivers with objective information that can be used to guide bedside care, help clinicians avoid complications and navigate infants to faster oral feeds and subsequently earlier and safer hospital discharge with lowered expense.

SUBMITTER: Capilouto GJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5171225 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Objective assessment of a preterm infant's nutritive sucking from initiation of feeding through hospitalization and discharge.

Capilouto Gilson J GJ Cunningham Tommy J TJ

Neonatal intensive care : the journal of perinatology-neonatology 20160101 1

<h4>Introduction</h4>In 2008, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that an infant's ability to feed independently be considered a primary consideration for discharge home. To date, NICU healthcare teams have relied on clinical experience as well as descriptive scales to determine a high risk infant's ability to transition safely from tube feeding to oral feeding. The aim of the current case study was to illustrate the clinical utility of nfant<sup>®</sup> Feeding Solution as a noninvas ...[more]

PMID: 28008218

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background/rationaleSystematic reviews on the effects of pacifiers on occlusion have highlighted the need for quality RCTs.Trial designSingle region, three parallel-armed, prospective, randomized controlled trial.ObjectivesTo investigate the correlations between early childhood non-nutritive sucking habits and malocclusion. Specifically to test whether the use of a study pacifier has differing effects compared to other pacifiers and control, and whether the duration of pacifier use or digit sucking influence the occlusion.ParticipantsThe subjects were firstborn children, born in 2008 in Vantaa, Finland.InterventionOne-third of participants were offered study pacifiers, free of charge, from birth up to 2 years of age. The history of the subjects' sucking habits, including pacifier use was screened in a questionnaire at the age of 2 years, and clinical examinations were performed at the age of 7 years. In addition, the subjects were divided into groups that were equally matched regarding their mother's level of education.OutcomesPosterior crossbite, anterior crossbite, overjet, deep bite, open bite, and crowding.Randomization methodThree districts were randomly allocated to three study groups by drawing lots.BlindingIt was not possible to blind the clinicians or parents from the intervention. Blinding during data analysis was performed.ResultsFrom the original cohort of 2715 children born in the town of Vantaa, 1911 were excluded and 353 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 451 children were divided into three groups according to the use of pacifiers. The prevalence of posterior crossbite at the age of 7 years was higher if a non-study pacifier had been used (P = .005) even when matched for the mother's level of education (P = .029). The prevalence of posterior crossbite was higher if the pacifier habit had continued for 12 months or more compared to 11 months or less, 7% and 1%, respectively, (P = .003). Digit sucking for 12 months or more was associated with crowding (P = .016). The prevalence of crossbite in the study pacifier group was less than in control pacifiers.HarmsNo adverse harms were reported other than effects on the dentition.ConclusionThe use of pacifiers is associated with the posterior crossbite, especially if their use continues for a year or more. Parents/guardians should be advised to stop the use or reduce the use of pacifiers to a minimum after their child's first birthday.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01854502.

Project description:BACKGROUND: There is very little evidence of the similarity of the mechanics of maternal and bottle feeding. We assessed the mechanics of sucking in exclusive breastfeeding, exclusive bottle feeding, and mixed feeding. The hypothesis established was that physiological pattern for suckling movements differ depending on the type of feeding. According to this hypothesis, babies with breastfeeding have suckling movements at the breast that are different from the movements of suckling a teat of babies fed with bottle. Children with mixed feeding mix both types of suckling movements. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of infants aged 21-28 days with only maternal feeding or bottle feeding (234 mother-infant pairs), and a randomized open cross-over field trial in newborns aged 21-28 days and babies aged 3-5 months with mixed feeding (125 mother-infant pairs). Primary outcome measures were sucks and pauses. RESULTS: Infants aged 21-28 days exclusively bottle-fed showed fewer sucks and the same number of pauses but of longer duration compared to breastfeeding. In mixed feeding, bottle feeding compared to breastfeeding showed the same number of sucks but fewer and shorter pauses, both at 21-28 days and at 3-5 months. The mean number of breastfeedings in a day (in the mixed feed group) was 5.83 +/- 1.93 at 21-28 days and 4.42 +/- 1.67 at 3-5 months. In the equivalence analysis of the mixed feed group, the 95% confidence interval for bottle feeding/breastfeeding ratio laid outside the range of equivalence, indicating 5.9-8.7% fewer suction movements, and fewer pauses, and shorter duration of them in bottle feeding compared with breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanics of sucking in mixed feeding lay outside the range of equivalence comparing bottle feeding with breastfeeding, although differences were small. Children with mixed feeding would mix both types of sucking movements (breastfeeding and bottle feeding) during the learning stage and adopt their own pattern.

Project description:To assess national expenditure associated with preterm-infant brain MRI and potential impact of reduction per Choosing Wisely campaign 2015 recommendation to "avoid routine screening term-equivalent or discharge brain MRIs in preterm-infants". Cross-sectional U.S. trend data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) database (2006, 2009, 2012, 2016) was used to estimate overall national expenditure associated with brain MRI among infants with gestational age (GA) ≤36 weeks, and also when classified as 'not indicated' (NI-MRI) i.e., equivalent to routine use without clinical indications and regarded as low-value service (LVS). Associated cost was determined by querying CMS-database for physician-fee-schedules to find the highest global procedure-cost per cycle, then adjusting for inflation. Sensitivity-analyses were conducted to account for additional clinical charges associated with NI-MRI. 3,768 (0.26%) of 1,472,236 preterm-infants had brain MRI across all cycles (inflation-adjusted total $3,690,088). Overall proportion of brain MRIs increased across 2006-2012 from 0.25%-0.33% but decreased in 2016 to 0.16% (P<0.001). Inflation-adjusted overall expenditure by cycle was: 2006, $1,299,130 (95% CI: $987,505, $1,610,755); 2009, $1,194,208 (95% CI: $873,487, $1,516,154); 2012, $931,836 (95% CI: $666,114, $1,197,156); and 2016, $264,648 (95% CI: $172,061, $357,280). Prevalence for NI-MRI in 2006, 2009, 2012 and 2016 was 86% (n = 809), 88% (n = 940), 89% (n = 1028) and 50% (n = 299), respectively; and 70% were in infants 35-36 weeks GA. NI-MRI prevalence was not different over time by payer-type (Medicaid, private), sex or race/ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic); larger hospital size was significantly associated across 2006-2012 but this declined for all sizes in 2016, with most decline in larger hospitals (P for interaction <0.05). NI-MRI expenditure sensitivity-analysis with addition of cycle median total-admission-charge to inflation-adjusted CMS-fee was $1,190,919/$518,343, for 2012/2016 cycles respectively. National MRI prevalence in preterm infants (both overall and LVS) and associated expenditure decreased substantially post recommendation; however, annual savings are modest and unlikely to be >$1.2 million.

Dataset Information

Objective assessment of a preterm infant's nutritive sucking from initiation of feeding through hospitalization and discharge.

Publications

Objective assessment of a preterm infant's nutritive sucking from initiation of feeding through hospitalization and discharge.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets