Dataset Information

NanoStringDiff: a novel statistical method for differential expression analysis based on NanoString nCounter data.

ABSTRACT: The advanced medium-throughput NanoString nCounter technology has been increasingly used for mRNA or miRNA differential expression (DE) studies due to its advantages including direct measurement of molecule expression levels without amplification, digital readout and superior applicability to formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples. However, the analysis of nCounter data is hampered because most methods developed are based on t-tests, which do not fit the count data generated by the NanoString nCounter system. Furthermore, data normalization procedures of current methods are either not suitable for counts or not specific for NanoString nCounter data. We develop a novel DE detection method based on NanoString nCounter data. The method, named NanoStringDiff, considers a generalized linear model of the negative binomial family to characterize count data and allows for multifactor design. Data normalization is incorporated in the model framework through data normalization parameters, which are estimated from positive controls, negative controls and housekeeping genes embedded in the nCounter system. We propose an empirical Bayes shrinkage approach to estimate the dispersion parameter in the model and a likelihood ratio test to identify differentially expressed genes. Simulations and real data analysis demonstrate that the proposed method performs better than existing methods.

SUBMITTER: Wang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5175344 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

NanoStringDiff: a novel statistical method for differential expression analysis based on NanoString nCounter data.

Wang Hong H Horbinski Craig C Wu Hao H Liu Yinxing Y Sheng Shaoyi S Liu Jinpeng J Weiss Heidi H Stromberg Arnold J AJ Wang Chi C

Nucleic acids research 20160728 20

The advanced medium-throughput NanoString nCounter technology has been increasingly used for mRNA or miRNA differential expression (DE) studies due to its advantages including direct measurement of molecule expression levels without amplification, digital readout and superior applicability to formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples. However, the analysis of nCounter data is hampered because most methods developed are based on t-tests, which do not fit the count data generated by the NanoString ...[more]

PMID: 27471031

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWith the development of new drug combinations and targeted treatments for multiple types of cancer, the ability to stratify categories of patient populations and to develop companion diagnostics has become increasingly important. A panel of 325 RNA biomarkers was selected based on cancer-related biological processes of healthy cells and gene expression changes over time during nonmalignant epithelial cell organization. This "cancer in reverse" approach resulted in a panel of biomarkers relevant for at least 7 cancer types, providing gene expression profiles representing key cellular signaling pathways beyond mutations in "driver genes." Objective. To further investigate this biomarker panel, the objective of the current study is to (1) validate the assay reproducibility for the 325 RNA biomarkers and (2) compare gene expression profiles side by side using two technology platforms.Methods and resultsWe have mapped the 325 RNA transcripts and in a custom NanoString nCounter expression panel to be compared to all potential probe sets in the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0. The experiments were conducted with 10 unique biological formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast tumor samples. Each site extracted RNA from four sections of 10-micron thick FFPE tissue over three different days by two different operators using an optimized standard operating procedure and quality control criteria. Samples were analyzed using mas5 in BioConductor and NanoStringNorm in R. Pearson correlation showed reproducibility between sites for all 60 samples with r = 0.995 for Affymetrix and r = 0.999 for NanoString. Correlation in multiple days and multiple users was for Affymetrix r = (0.962 - 0.999) and for NanoString r = (0.982 - 0.991).ConclusionThe 325 RNA biomarkers showed reproducibility in two technology platforms with moderate to high concordance. Future directions include performing clinical validation studies and generating rationale for patient selection in clinical trials using the technically validated assay.

Project description:BackgroundTriple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and complex subtype of breast cancer. The current biomarkers used in the context of breast cancer treatment are highly dependent on the targeting of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or HER2, resulting in treatment failure and disease recurrence and creating clinical challenges. Thus, there is still a crucial need for the improvement of TNBC treatment; the discovery of effective biomarkers that can be easily translated to the clinics is essential.MethodsWe report an approach for the discovery of biomarkers that can predict tumour relapse and pathologic complete response (pCR) in TNBC on the basis of mRNA expression quantified using the NanoString nCounter Immunology Panel. To overcome the limited sample size, prediction models based on random Forest were constructed using the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) as selected features. We also evaluated the differences between pre- and post-treatment groups aiming for the combinatorial assessment of pCR and relapse using additive models in edgeR.ResultsWe identify nine and 13 DEGs strongly associated with pCR and relapse, respectively, from 579 immune genes in a small number of samples (n = 55) using edgeR. An additive model for the comparison of pre- and post-treatment groups via the adjustment of the independent subject in the relapse group revealed associations for 41 genes. Comprehensive analysis indicated that our prediction models outperformed those constructed using features extracted from the existing feature selection model Elastic Net in terms of accuracy. The prediction models were assessed using a randomization test to validate the robustness (empirical P for the model of pCR = 0.015 and empirical P for the model of relapse = 0.018). Furthermore, three DEGs (FCER1A, EDNRB, and TGFBI) in the model of relapse showed prognostic significance for predicting the survival of patients with cancer through Cox proportional hazards regression model-based survival analysis.ConclusionGene expression quantified via the NanoString nCounter Immunology Panel can be seamlessly analysed using edgeR, even considering small sample sizes. Our approach provides a scalable framework that can easily be applied for the discovery of biomarkers based on the NanoString nCounter Immunology Panel.Data availabilityThe source code will be available from github at https://github.com/sungheep/nanostring .

Project description:BackgroundA challenge in gene expression studies is the reliable identification of differentially expressed genes. In many high-throughput studies, genes are accepted as differentially expressed only if they satisfy simultaneously a p value criterion and a fold change criterion. A statistical method, TREAT, has been developed for microarray data to assess formally if fold changes are significantly higher than a predefined threshold. We have recently applied the NanoString digital platform to study expression of mouse odorant receptor genes, which form with 1,200 members the largest gene family in the mouse genome. Our objectives are, on these data, to decrease false discoveries when formally assessing the genes relative to a fold change threshold, and to provide a guided selection in the choice of this threshold.ResultsStatistical tests have been developed for microarray data to identify genes that are differentially expressed relative to a fold change threshold. Here we report that another approach, which we refer to as tTREAT, is more appropriate for our NanoString data, where false discoveries lead to costly and time-consuming follow-up experiments. Methods that we refer to as tTREAT2 and the running fold change model improve the performance of the statistical tests by protecting or selecting the fold change threshold more objectively. We show the benefits on simulated and real data.ConclusionsGene-wise statistical analyses of gene expression data, for which the significance relative to a fold change threshold is important, give reproducible and reliable results on NanoString data of mouse odorant receptor genes. Because it can be difficult to set in advance a fold change threshold that is meaningful for the available data, we developed methods that enable a better choice (thus reducing false discoveries and/or missed genes) or avoid this choice altogether. This set of tools may be useful for the analysis of other types of gene expression data.

Dataset Information

NanoStringDiff: a novel statistical method for differential expression analysis based on NanoString nCounter data.

Publications

NanoStringDiff: a novel statistical method for differential expression analysis based on NanoString nCounter data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets