Dataset Information

Assessing Microstructural Substrates of White Matter Abnormalities: A Comparative Study Using DTI and NODDI.

ABSTRACT: Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) enables more specific characterization of tissue microstructure by estimating neurite density (NDI) and orientation dispersion (ODI), two key contributors to fractional anisotropy (FA). The present work compared NODDI- with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived indices for investigating white matter abnormalities in a clinical sample. We assessed the added value of NODDI parameters over FA, by contrasting group differences identified by both models. Diffusion-weighted images with multiple shells were acquired in a group of 8 healthy controls and 8 patients with an inherited metabolic disease. Both standard DTI and NODDI analyses were performed. Tract based spatial statistics (TBSS) was used for group inferences, after which overlap and unique contributions across different parameters were evaluated. Results showed that group differences in NDI and ODI were complementary, and together could explain much of the FA results. Further, compared to FA analysis, NDI and ODI gave a pattern of results that was more regionally specific and were able to capture additional discriminative voxels that FA failed to identify. Finally, ODI from single-shell NODDI analysis, but not NDI, was found to reproduce the group differences from the multi-shell analysis. To conclude, by using a clinically feasible acquisition and analysis protocol, we demonstrated that NODDI is of added value to standard DTI, by revealing specific microstructural substrates to white matter changes detected with FA. As the (simpler) DTI model was more sensitive in identifying group differences, NODDI is recommended to be used complementary to DTI, thereby adding greater specificity regarding microstructural underpinnings of the differences. The finding that ODI abnormalities can be identified reliably using single-shell data may allow the retrospective analysis of standard DTI with NODDI.

SUBMITTER: Timmers I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5176300 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assessing Microstructural Substrates of White Matter Abnormalities: A Comparative Study Using DTI and NODDI.

Timmers Inge I Roebroeck Alard A Bastiani Matteo M Jansma Bernadette B Rubio-Gozalbo Estela E Zhang Hui H

PloS one 20161221 12

Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) enables more specific characterization of tissue microstructure by estimating neurite density (NDI) and orientation dispersion (ODI), two key contributors to fractional anisotropy (FA). The present work compared NODDI- with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived indices for investigating white matter abnormalities in a clinical sample. We assessed the added value of NODDI parameters over FA, by contrasting group differences identified by ...[more]

PMID: 28002426

Similar Datasets

Project description:Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a noninvasive, quantitative MRI technique that measures white matter (WM) integrity. Many brain dimensions are heritable, including white matter integrity measured with DTI. Family studies are valuable to provide insights into the interactive effects of non-environmental factors on multiple sclerosis (MS). To examine the contribution of familial factors to the diffusion signals across WM microstructure, we performed DTI and calculated neurite orientation dispersion plus density imaging (NODDI) diffusion parameters in two patient groups comprising familial and sporadic forms of multiple sclerosis and their unaffected relatives. We divided 111 subjects (49 men and 62 women: age range 19-60) into three groups conforming to their MS history. The familial MS group included 30 participants (patients; n = 16, healthy relatives; n = 14). The sporadic group included 41 participants (patients; n = 10, healthy relatives; n = 31). Forty age-matched subjects with no history of MS in their families were defined as the control group. To study white matter integrity, two methods were employed: one for calculating the mean of DTI, FA, and MD parameters on 18 tracts using Tracts Constrained by Underlying Anatomy (TRACULA) and the other for whole brain voxel-based analysis using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) on NDI and ODI parameters derived from NODDI and DTI parameters. Voxel-based analysis showed considerable changes in FA, MD, NDI, and ODI in the familial group when compared with the control group, reflecting widespread impairment of white matter in this group. The analysis of 18 tracts with TRACULA revealed increased MD and FA reduction in more tracts (left and right ILF, UNC, and SLFT, forceps major and minor) in familial MS patients vs. the control group. There were no significant differences between the patient groups. We found no consequential changes in healthy relatives of both patient groups in voxel-based and tract analyses. Considering the multifactorial etiology of MS, familial studies are of great importance to clarify the effects of certain predisposing factors on demyelinating brain pathology.

Project description:The NODDI-DTI signal model is a modification of the NODDI signal model that formally allows interpretation of standard single-shell DTI data in terms of biophysical parameters in healthy human white matter (WM). The NODDI-DTI signal model contains no CSF compartment, restricting application to voxels without CSF partial-volume contamination. This modification allowed derivation of analytical relations between parameters representing axon density and dispersion, and DTI invariants (MD and FA) from the NODDI-DTI signal model. These relations formally allow extraction of biophysical parameters from DTI data. NODDI-DTI parameters were estimated by applying the proposed analytical relations to DTI parameters estimated from the first shell of data, and compared to parameters estimated by fitting the NODDI-DTI model to both shells of data (reference dataset) in the WM of 14 in vivo diffusion datasets recorded with two different protocols, and in simulated data. The first two datasets were also fit to the NODDI-DTI model using only the first shell (as for DTI) of data. NODDI-DTI parameters estimated from DTI, and NODDI-DTI parameters estimated by fitting the model to the first shell of data gave similar errors compared to two-shell NODDI-DTI estimates. The simulations showed the NODDI-DTI method to be more noise-robust than the two-shell fitting procedure. The NODDI-DTI method gave unphysical parameter estimates in a small percentage of voxels, reflecting voxelwise DTI estimation error or NODDI-DTI model invalidity. In the course of evaluating the NODDI-DTI model, it was found that diffusional kurtosis strongly biased DTI-based MD values, and so, making assumptions based on healthy WM, a novel heuristic correction requiring only DTI data was derived and used to mitigate this bias. Since validations were only performed on healthy WM, application to grey matter or pathological WM would require further validation. Our results demonstrate NODDI-DTI to be a promising model and technique to interpret restricted datasets acquired for DTI analysis in healthy white matter with greater biophysical specificity, though its limitations must be borne in mind.

Dataset Information

Assessing Microstructural Substrates of White Matter Abnormalities: A Comparative Study Using DTI and NODDI.

Publications

Assessing Microstructural Substrates of White Matter Abnormalities: A Comparative Study Using DTI and NODDI.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets