Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Mapping Soil Transmitted Helminths and Schistosomiasis under Uncertainty: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Evidence.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Spatial modelling of STH and schistosomiasis epidemiology is now commonplace. Spatial epidemiological studies help inform decisions regarding the number of people at risk as well as the geographic areas that need to be targeted with mass drug administration; however, limited attention has been given to propagated uncertainties, their interpretation, and consequences for the mapped values. Using currently published literature on the spatial epidemiology of helminth infections we identified: (1) the main uncertainty sources, their definition and quantification and (2) how uncertainty is informative for STH programme managers and scientists working in this domain.

Methodology/principal findings

We performed a systematic literature search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol. We searched Web of Knowledge and PubMed using a combination of uncertainty, geographic and disease terms. A total of 73 papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Only 9% of the studies did not address any element of uncertainty, while 91% of studies quantified uncertainty in the predicted morbidity indicators and 23% of studies mapped it. In addition, 57% of the studies quantified uncertainty in the regression coefficients but only 7% incorporated it in the regression response variable (morbidity indicator). Fifty percent of the studies discussed uncertainty in the covariates but did not quantify it. Uncertainty was mostly defined as precision, and quantified using credible intervals by means of Bayesian approaches.

Conclusion/significance

None of the studies considered adequately all sources of uncertainties. We highlighted the need for uncertainty in the morbidity indicator and predictor variable to be incorporated into the modelling framework. Study design and spatial support require further attention and uncertainty associated with Earth observation data should be quantified. Finally, more attention should be given to mapping and interpreting uncertainty, since they are relevant to inform decisions regarding the number of people at risk as well as the geographic areas that need to be targeted with mass drug administration.

SUBMITTER: Araujo Navas AL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5179027 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Mapping Soil Transmitted Helminths and Schistosomiasis under Uncertainty: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Evidence.

Araujo Navas Andrea L AL   Hamm Nicholas A S NA   Soares Magalhães Ricardo J RJ   Stein Alfred A  

PLoS neglected tropical diseases 20161222 12


<h4>Background</h4>Spatial modelling of STH and schistosomiasis epidemiology is now commonplace. Spatial epidemiological studies help inform decisions regarding the number of people at risk as well as the geographic areas that need to be targeted with mass drug administration; however, limited attention has been given to propagated uncertainties, their interpretation, and consequences for the mapped values. Using currently published literature on the spatial epidemiology of helminth infections w  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4509651 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5849360 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC535894 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5028061 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA304165 | ENA
| S-EPMC8931967 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5014250 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9278740 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4783033 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6367841 | biostudies-other